Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Cancer Res ; 18(10): 2861-71, 2012 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22434666

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: In this study, we examine the immunomodulatory effects and antitumor activity of tamoxifen and letrozole when combined with the human epithelial mucin (hMUC1)-specific vaccine, L-BLP25, in the hMUC1-expressing mammary tumor (MMT) mouse model. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Dose-finding studies were conducted for both tamoxifen and letrozole. Letrozole and L-BLP25 combination studies used 69 MMT female mice assigned to five groups: untreated, cyclophosphamide + placebo, cyclophosphamide + L-BLP25, letrozole 0.8 mg/kg, and cyclophosphamide + L-BLP25 + letrozole. Tamoxifen and L-BLP25 combination studies used 48 MMT female mice assigned to five treatment groups: untreated, cyclophosphamide + placebo, cyclophosphamide + L-BLP25, tamoxifen 50 mg/kg, and cyclophosphamide + L-BLP25 + tamoxifen 50 mg/kg group. Mice were injected subcutaneously with L-BLP25 (10 µg) weekly for 8 weeks. Serum cytokines were serially measured using a Luminex assay, whereas splenocytes at termination were analyzed by ELISpot to determine T-helper (T(H))1/T(H)2 polarization of immune response. RESULTS: Daily oral doses of 50 and 0.8 mg/kg of tamoxifen and letrozole, respectively, resulted in a significant survival advantage over controls (P < 0.05). A predominant T(H)1-polarized immune response in vaccinated mice was seen with or without tamoxifen or letrozole treatments. In the L-BLP25 plus letrozole treatment group, statistically significant (P < 0.05) additive antitumor activity was observed, whereas tamoxifen plus L-BLP25 was not significantly different (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that hormonal therapy does not interfere with L-BLP25-induced predominant T(H)1 response, and the combination of L-BLP25 with letrozole has additive antitumor activity in the MMT mouse model.


Subject(s)
Cancer Vaccines/therapeutic use , Mammary Neoplasms, Animal/drug therapy , Membrane Glycoproteins/therapeutic use , Mucin-1/biosynthesis , Nitriles/therapeutic use , Triazoles/therapeutic use , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Aromatase Inhibitors , Cancer Vaccines/pharmacology , Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage , Cyclophosphamide/pharmacology , Estradiol/administration & dosage , Estrogen Antagonists/pharmacology , Estrogen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Female , Interferon-gamma/biosynthesis , Interleukin-12/biosynthesis , Letrozole , Membrane Glycoproteins/pharmacology , Mice , Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent/drug therapy , Nitriles/pharmacology , Random Allocation , Tamoxifen/pharmacology , Tamoxifen/therapeutic use , Th1 Cells/immunology , Triazoles/pharmacology
2.
Menopause ; 19(1): 96-103, 2012 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21926925

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Ospemifene, a new drug indicated for the treatment of vulvovaginal atrophy, has completed phase III clinical trials. A condition affecting millions of women worldwide, vulvovaginal atrophy has long been treated with estrogen therapy. Estrogen treatment carries with it risks of thromboembolism, endometrial proliferative effects, and breast cancer promotion. In this study, we test the effects of three dosing levels of ospemifene in both the prevention and treatment of breast cancer in the MTag.Tg mouse model. METHODS: The polyomavirus middle-T transgenic mouse model (MTag.Tg), which produces synchronized, multifocal mammary tumors in the immunologically intact C57BL/6 background, was used to examine the impact of ospemifene treatment. First, a cell line derived from an MTag.Tg mouse tumor (MTag 34) was treated in vitro with ospemifene and its major metabolite, 4-hydroxyospemifene (4-OH ospemifene). MTag.Tg mice were treated daily by gavage with three different doses of ospemifene (5, 25, and 50 mg/kg) before or after the development of mammary tumors. Survival and tumor development results were used to determine the effect of ospemifene treatment on mammary tumors in both the preventive and treatment settings. RESULTS: Tumors and the MTag 34 cell line were positive for estrogen receptor expression. The MTag 34 line was not stimulated by ospemifene or its major, active metabolite 4-OH ospemifene in vitro. Ospemifene increased survival time and exerted an antitumor effect on the development and growth of estrogen receptor-positive mammary tumors in the MTag.Tg mouse model at the 50-mg/kg dose. The levels of ospemifene and 4-OH ospemifene in both the tumors and plasma of mice confirmed the dosing. Ospemifene did not exert an estrogenic effect in the breast tissue at doses equivalent to human dosing. CONCLUSIONS: Ospemifene prevents and treats estrogen receptor-positive MTag.Tg mammary tumors in this immune-intact mouse model in a dose-dependent fashion. Ospemifene drug levels in the plasma of treated mice were comparable with those found in humans. Combined with our previous data, ospemifene does not seem to pose a breast cancer risk in animals and slows down cancer development and progression in the MTag.Tg model.


Subject(s)
Mammary Neoplasms, Experimental/drug therapy , Mammary Neoplasms, Experimental/prevention & control , Tamoxifen/analogs & derivatives , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Cell Line, Tumor , Estrogen Receptor alpha/analysis , Female , Humans , Mammary Neoplasms, Experimental/chemistry , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Mice, Transgenic , Tamoxifen/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...