Length and clinical effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation in outpatients with chronic airway obstruction.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) after 10 or 20 consecutive sessions in outpatients with chronic airway obstruction (CAO). DESIGN: Observational prospective cohort trial. SETTING: Outpatient clinic of a rehabilitation center. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Twenty-five outpatients (mean age, 65 +/- 9 years [+/- SD]; FEV1, 64 +/- 12% predicted) admitted to a comprehensive PR program, including exercise training. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The load reached on a cycloergometer (maximal achieved load [W-max]), the maximal and isoload dyspnea and leg fatigue on a Borg scale, 6-min walk distance (6MWD), and the health-related quality of life as assessed using the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) [total and components score] have been recorded as outcome measures at baseline, after 10 sessions (T10), and after 20 sessions (T20). The predefined criteria of the clinically significant improvement were as follows: + 15% W-max, + 54 m at 6MWD, - 1 point at isoload dyspnea and leg fatigue, and - 4% at SGRQ scores. There was a mean significant difference between changes at T20 and T10 for 6MWD (- 42.96 m; 95% confidence interval [CI], - 57.79 to - 28.12 m; p = 0.001), total SGRQ (4.80; 95% CI, 2.29 to 7.31; p = 0.001), activity SGRQ (3.60; 95% CI, 0.48 to 6.71; p = 0.025), and symptoms SGRQ (5.96; 95% CI, 2.72 to 9.2; p = 0.001). The percentage of patients who improved was different at T20 as compared with T10 for W-max (68% and 48%, respectively; p = 0.025), 6MWD (76% and 20%, p = 0.001), and total SGRQ (64% and 36%, p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: A 10-session course of PR provides only limited clinically significant changes of outcome measures when compared with a 20-session course in outpatients with CAO of mild-to-moderate severity.

Occupational therapy and pulmonary rehabilitation of disabled COPD patients.

BACKGROUND: Occupational therapy (OT) has been defined as a task of rehabilitation for disabled patients, giving them maximal function and independence to sustain specific activities of daily living. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of OT as an adjunctive measuring during pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) of hospitalized COPD patients. METHODS: A prospective clinical trial with parallel groups was undertaken in severely disabled COPD patients (n = 71, age 73 +/- 5 years). They were assigned to either OT+PR (n = 47, FEV1 46 +/- 21%pred.) or PR (n = 24, FEV1 44 +/- 12%pred.). PR consisted of eighteen 3-hour daily sessions, whilst OT (domestic activities) was added 3 times a week up to nine 1-hour sessions. Six-min walk (6MWD) with evaluation of BORG dyspnea (D) and leg fatigue (F) scores at end of effort, breathlessness sensation (B) by means of the MRC scale as well as the number of functions lost in the Basic Activity of Daily Living (BADL) categories were assessed as outcomes before (T0) and after (T1) rehabilitation. RESULTS: 6MWD (from 165 +/- 63 to 233 +/- 66 and from 187 +/- 52 to 234 +/- 65 m in the OT+PR and PR groups, respectively), D (from 4.9 +/- 2.1 to 3.2 +/- 1.6 and from 5.3 +/- 2.1 to 3.4 +/- 2.1), F (from 6.1 +/- 0.5 to 4.5 +/- 1.7 and from 5.9 +/- 0.8 to 4.3 +/- 0.8) and B (from 4.3 +/- 0.9 to 3.0 +/- 0.9 and from 4.2 +/- 1.0 to 3.2 +/- 0.8) had similarly improved (p < 0.01) in both groups at T1. The percentage distribution of patients across the BADL categories significantly changed (p = 0.004) in OT+PR (from 17 to 61%, from 70 to 34% and from 23 to 5% in categories A, B and C, respectively) but not in the PR group. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of OT to comprehensive PR is able to specifically improve the outcome of severely disabled COPD inpatients.