Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
Neuron ; 95(3): 673-682.e4, 2017 Aug 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28735746

ABSTRACT

Animals employ active touch to optimize the acuity of their tactile sensors. Prior experimental results and models lead to the hypothesis that sensory inputs are used in a recurrent manner to tune the position of the sensors. A combination of electrophysiology, intersectional genetic viral labeling and manipulation, and classical tracing allowed us to identify second-order sensorimotor loops that control vibrissa movements by rodents. Facial motoneurons that drive intrinsic muscles to protract the vibrissae receive a short latency inhibitory input, followed by synaptic excitation, from neurons located in the oralis division of the trigeminal sensory complex. In contrast, motoneurons that retract the mystacial pad and indirectly retract the vibrissae receive only excitatory input from interpolaris cells that further project to the thalamus. Silencing this feedback alters retraction. The observed pull-push circuit at the lowest-level sensorimotor loop provides a mechanism for the rapid modulation of vibrissa touch during exploration of peri-personal space.


Subject(s)
Behavior, Animal/physiology , Brain Stem/physiology , Feedback , Movement/physiology , Vibrissae/physiology , Animals , Female , Male , Mice , Motor Neurons/metabolism , Rats, Long-Evans , Thalamus/physiology , Touch/physiology
3.
J Neurosci ; 30(3): 1057-63, 2010 Jan 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20089914

ABSTRACT

Trigeminal neurons that relay vibrissal messages to the thalamus receive input from first-order afferents that are tuned to different directions of whisker motion. This raises the question of how directional tuning is maintained in central relay stations of the whisker system. In the present study we performed a detailed analysis of the angular tuning properties of cells in the principal trigeminal nucleus of the rat. We found that stimulus direction systematically influences response latency, so that the degree of directional tuning and the preferred deflection angle computed with first-spike latency yielded results nearly similar to those obtained with spike counts. Furthermore, we found that inhibition sharpens directional selectivity, and that pharmacological blockade of inhibition markedly decreases the angular tuning of cellular responses. These results indicate that the angular tuning of cells in the first relay station of the vibrissal system is determined by fast feedforward inhibition, which shapes excitatory inputs at the very beginning of synaptic integration.


Subject(s)
Neural Inhibition/physiology , Neurons/physiology , Orientation/physiology , Trigeminal Nuclei/cytology , Trigeminal Nuclei/physiology , Vibrissae/physiology , Action Potentials/drug effects , Action Potentials/physiology , Animals , Electric Stimulation/methods , GABA Antagonists/pharmacology , Glycine Agents/pharmacology , Male , Neurons/drug effects , Physical Stimulation/methods , Pyridazines/pharmacology , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Reaction Time/drug effects , Reaction Time/physiology , Strychnine/pharmacology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...