Emergency Liver Retransplantation With Marginal Donors.

BACKGROUND: The goal of the present study is to determine if using marginal donors negatively impacts the outcomes of emergency liver retransplantation. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study was performed, including all emergency liver retransplantations done in our center between 1990 and 2021. Recipients from the control group received the second grafts from "ideal donors", and patients from the case group received them from marginal donors. Analyzed variables included demographics of recipients and donors, complications, and survival rates. RESULTS: 38 emergency retransplantations were performed. 23 recipients were included in the control group, and the remaining 15 were in the case group. The second donors from the case group were significantly older (mean age 58 vs 71 years old, P < 0.0001). On the contrary, there were no differences between groups regarding the mean age of recipients, comorbidities, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores, or causes of retransplantation (the most common was hepatic artery thrombosis). No differences were found in early perioperative death rates (control group 26.1% vs case group 20%, P =1) and, although the case group seemed to have slightly poorer outcomes in long-term survival (control group 70%, 61%, and 55% vs case group 73%, 59%, and 39%, respectively, at 1, 5, and 10 years), the differences were not statistically significant (log-rank = 0.808). CONCLUSIONS: The use of marginal donors for emergency liver retransplantation was proved safe in our study, as there were no differences in complications or in short- or mid-term survival rates.

Liver Resuscitation With Hypothermic Oxygenated Perfusion After Donation in Asystolic Type Iii With Regional Perfusion in Normothermia: A Case Report About First Experience in Spain.

BACKGROUND: Extended criteria donor livers are increasingly being accepted for transplant in an attempt to bridge the gap between the number of patients on the waiting list and the number of available donor livers. Our objective was to describe our first case of hepatic resuscitation by means of an ex situ perfusion machine in hypothermia with oxygen insufflation of a liver graft extracted from a donor in type 3 asystole after regional perfusion in normothermia. METHODS: A 53-year-old woman with disabling polycystic liver disease was included on the liver transplant waiting list. Donation was offered in type 3 asystole with regional perfusion in normothermia. Given that it was an elderly donor with a low-weight graft, hepatic resuscitation was decided by means of an ex situ perfusion machine in hypothermia with oxygen insufflation. RESULTS: After performing the bench work, the injector is selectively cannulated via the portal to connect it to the hypothermic perfusion machine. The average temperature of the perfusate (3 L modified Belzer) was 10°C for 120 minutes at 250 mL/min. The implant was completed without the need for transfusion of blood products, postreperfusion Sd, or vasoactive support. Peak of GOT/GPT was 803/276 at 24 hours posttransplant.

Results of Early Liver Retransplantation.

BACKGROUND: Liver retransplantation can be classified as urgent (when performed in the first week after the transplantation) or elective, which may be considered as early (first month post-transplantation) or late (after the first month). The time in which retransplantation takes place is determined by the cause that makes it necessary. The goal of this study is to analyze the causes and results of early retransplantation in our center. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of liver retransplantations performed within the first month after the original transplantation in our center between 2007 and 2017 was carried out. The variables analyzed were demographic, causes of the first transplant and retransplantation, and the complications and mortality resulting from the latter. RESULTS: A total of 698 liver transplants were performed, including 67 patients who required retransplantation (8.9%). Among these, 37 were late elective retransplantations and 30 were early retransplantations. Regarding the latter, the causes that led to the first transplant were hepatocellular carcinoma (46.7%) and noncholestatic cirrhosis (30%). On the other hand, the main precipitants of the retransplantation were hepatic artery thrombosis (60%) and primary graft failure (13.3%). The reoperation rate was 16.7%, and the perioperative mortality rate was 16.7%. The 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates were 83.3%, 76.7% and 59.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Despite the high perioperative morbidity of liver retransplantation, its results in terms of survival are similar to those of the global series of liver transplantation.

Management of Large, Spontaneous Portosystemic Shunts in Liver Transplantation: Case Report and Review of Literature.

BACKGROUND: The presence of collateral circulation in liver cirrhosis patients with portal hypertension is quite frequent due to re-permeabilization of closed embryonic channels. In some cases, these shunts could measure over 1 cm wide, therefore, containing a significative blood flow. Its management during liver transplantation could be challenging due to possible complications resulting from either ligation of the shunts or from ignoring them. We present the case of a patient with recurrent hepatic encephalopathy (HE) and a large spontaneous portosystemic shunt (SPSS) who submitted to liver transplant and review the literature identifying options, complications, and outcomes with the aim of facilitating decision making. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A 68-year-old, Spanish man diagnosed with liver cirrhosis with portal hypertension and recurrent episodes of HE is proposed for LT. The patient's Child-Pugh score was A6-B7, and the Model for End-stage Liver Disease score was 12. Preoperatively, a computed tomography scan showed a large SPSS running to the inferior cava vein. During the surgery, a small-sized portal vein and a large shunt measuring almost 3 cm wide were identified. After reperfusion, portal vein flow was 1000 to 1100 mL/min. Owing to the previous HE and the risk of low portal flow, the shunt was closed increasing the portal flow to 1800 mL/min. The patient was discharged without any complications. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of large SPSSs are frequent during LT. Decision making intraoperatively can be challenging due to possible complications derived from ligation of the SPSS or from ignoring it. Either preoperative assessment of a further HE risk or portal vein flow measurement after reperfusion are essential to achieve a correct resolution.