ABSTRACT
Stent thrombosis (ST) is a rare but catastrophic event to happen to a stented coronary artery. The incidence of ST has greatly been reduced after the advent of modern drug-eluting stent (DES) implants, which have become the most preferred treatment option in the stenting category for coronary artery disease (CAD). Although the risk reduction by newer category implant provides substantial benefits, the possibility of thrombosis still exists mostly during the early stage of DES implantation. The development of ST after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can be predicted by multiple factors, but advancements in early diagnostic techniques and modified stent types have greatly reduced the occurrence of this complication. Mortality, which is one of the complications of ST, is primarily influenced by patient-related factors such as incomplete treatment duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). The duration of DAPT after DES implantation in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is determined based on individual characteristics, mainly considered in view of bleeding or ischemia risk. Risk evaluation systems like DAPT/precise-DAPT scores help tailor and personalize the duration of DAPT for each individual patient. This systematic review contains pertinent articles extracted from the PubMed database. We retrieved articles from various study categories, encompassing publications from the period spanning 2014 to 2022. Our analysis highlighted results from studies investigating different aspects contributing to ST development. The most favorable prevention option was the use of customized DAPT intervention based on patient-specific predictable factors. Several complications associated with ST were identified, including recurrent ST, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) encompassing all-cause mortality (including cardiac and non-cardiac mortality), cerebrovascular accidents (CVA) or transient ischemic attacks (TIA), hospitalization due to heart failure, and myocardial infarction requiring revascularization. Mortality was also observed as a significant outcome. The umbrella term of ST includes multiple causative factors. Although DES has improved patient survival rates vastly with its usage, careful risk factor assessment and required follow-up, in each individual being stented, further guarantee a more promising reduction in late adverse outcomes.
ABSTRACT
Multiple sclerosis is a neurological disorder categorized by inflammatory processes with a high prevalence worldwide. It affects both motor and sensory pathways and is also associated with the visual pathway. Fingolimod is a commonly used drug for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. It is a sphingosine 1-phosphate modulator acting on its receptors for immune cell accumulation, neuronal function, embryological development, vascular permeability, smooth muscle cell function, and endothelial barrier maintenance. This review aims to understand the processes, mechanisms, risks, and management of fingolimod-associated macular edema. Due to the anti-inflammatory properties of fingolimod, it decreases various cytokines, including interleukin (IL)-1B and IL-6, spike wave, and spike amplitude, in electrophysiological activities and decreases insoluble receptors for advanced glycation end product ligand. A daily dosage of 0.5 mg of fingolimod has an increased association with macular edema. The serious adverse events of fingolimod are lymphopenia, cardiovascular events, ocular events, and carcinoma. Fingolimod decreases brain volume and increases vascular permeability, resulting in increased macular volume and damage to the blood-retinal barrier, which causes an increased risk for macular edema. Cystoid macular edema is more common in older individuals suffering from comorbidities affecting the retina, such as diabetes, or those undergoing ophthalmological surgeries. This review also highlights the importance of regular ophthalmology examinations on patients consuming fingolimod both in the initial stages and chronic use. The treatment options for macular edema include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetazolamide, triamcinolone, ketorolac, corticosteroids, and intravitreal procedures.
ABSTRACT
Acute intermittent porphyria (AIP) is a severe multiorgan dysfunction disorder that can be fatal if not treated promptly. The newest treatment modality involving small interfering RNA (siRNA) molecules, givosiran, is administered for AIP. Although it has very beneficial effects in treating attacks of AIP, it comes with an extensive side effect profile that is not fully understood or studied. Hence, this novel drug model treatment's risk-benefit evaluation is still necessary. For relevant medical literature, we explored medical databases such as PubMed/Medline, PubMed Central, Cochrane Library, Internet Archive Scholar, Google Scholar, and Wiley Online Library. The selected papers were screened based on eligibility criteria and filtered through quality appraisal tools, and 13 finalized research papers were included in the study. Of the 13 identified papers, three were clinical trials, and 10 were review articles. The selected papers all discussed the effectiveness and side effects of givosiran in acute and recurrent attacks of AIP. The research papers showed decreased rates of acute attacks of AIP with givosiran and terminating recurrent attacks. But there are certain non-serious side effects, like fatigue and nausea. Also, there are some severe side effects, like pain. There is limited information on renal and liver function impairment using givosiran and the use of givosiran in patients with kidney and liver disease, for which further studies are required.
ABSTRACT
Cannabis is frequently used by people who self-medicate for the signs of mental health conditions. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), a neurodevelopmental illness, has been linked to increased cannabis use. However, compared to other mental disorders, cannabis use by people with ADHD has received much less research. The main goal of this systematic review was to understand the nature of the relationships between cannabis use and ADHD symptoms. We used Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to conduct the systematic review. We included papers published within the previous ten years from online searches on PubMed, PubMed Central (PMC), Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect until January 1st, 2023. The inclusion-exclusion criteria led to the initial selection of 136 studies. We selected twenty research articles after screening and assessing them using quality assessment techniques. These articles included two non-randomized control trials, one cross-sectional study, one meta-analysis, and sixteen observational cohorts. It can be advantageous for people with ADHD and their medical professionals to understand better how ADHD patients use cannabis and its potential risks and advantages on cannabis use disorder, ADHD symptoms, and executive dysfunction. This article further emphasizes the necessity of thorough research to comprehend cannabis use in ADHD patients.
