Multimodal assessment improves neuroprognosis performance in clinically unresponsive critical-care patients with brain injury.

Accurately predicting functional outcomes for unresponsive patients with acute brain injury is a medical, scientific and ethical challenge. This prospective study assesses how a multimodal approach combining various numbers of behavioral, neuroimaging and electrophysiological markers affects the performance of outcome predictions. We analyzed data from 349 patients admitted to a tertiary neurointensive care unit between 2009 and 2021, categorizing prognoses as good, uncertain or poor, and compared these predictions with observed outcomes using the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E, levels ranging from 1 to 8, with higher levels indicating better outcomes). After excluding cases with life-sustaining therapy withdrawal to mitigate the self-fulfilling prophecy bias, our findings reveal that a good prognosis, compared with a poor or uncertain one, is associated with better one-year functional outcomes (common odds ratio (95% CI) for higher GOS-E: OR = 14.57 (5.70-40.32), P < 0.001; and 2.9 (1.56-5.45), P < 0.001, respectively). Moreover, increasing the number of assessment modalities decreased uncertainty (OR = 0.35 (0.21-0.59), P < 0.001) and improved prognostic accuracy (OR = 2.72 (1.18-6.47), P = 0.011). Our results underscore the value of multimodal assessment in refining neuroprognostic precision, thereby offering a robust foundation for clinical decision-making processes for acutely brain-injured patients. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04534777 .

PerBrain: a multimodal approach to personalized tracking of evolving state-of-consciousness in brain-injured patients: protocol of an international, multicentric, observational study.

BACKGROUND: Disorders of consciousness (DoC) are severe neurological conditions in which consciousness is impaired to various degrees. They are caused by injury or malfunction of neural systems regulating arousal and awareness. Over the last decades, major efforts in improving and individualizing diagnostic and prognostic accuracy for patients affected by DoC have been made, mainly focusing on introducing multimodal assessments to complement behavioral examination. The present EU-funded multicentric research project "PerBrain" is aimed at developing an individualized diagnostic hierarchical pathway guided by both behavior and multimodal neurodiagnostics for DoC patients. METHODS: In this project, each enrolled patient undergoes repetitive behavioral, clinical, and neurodiagnostic assessments according to a patient-tailored multi-layer workflow. Multimodal diagnostic acquisitions using state-of-the-art techniques at different stages of the patients' clinical evolution are performed. The techniques applied comprise well-established behavioral scales, innovative neurophysiological techniques (such as quantitative electroencephalography and transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with electroencephalography), structural and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging, and measurements of physiological activity (i.e. nasal airflow respiration). In addition, the well-being and treatment decision attitudes of patients' informal caregivers (primarily family members) are investigated. Patient and caregiver assessments are performed at multiple time points within one year after acquired brain injury, starting at the acute disease phase. DISCUSSION: Accurate classification and outcome prediction of DoC are of crucial importance for affected patients as well as their caregivers, as individual rehabilitation strategies and treatment decisions are critically dependent on the latter. The PerBrain project aims at optimizing individual DoC diagnosis and accuracy of outcome prediction by integrating data from the suggested multimodal examination methods into a personalized hierarchical diagnosis and prognosis procedure. Using the parallel tracking of both patients' neurological status and their caregivers' mental situation, well-being, and treatment decision attitudes from the acute to the chronic phase of the disease and across different countries, this project aims at significantly contributing to the current clinical routine of DoC patients and their family members. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04798456 . Registered 15 March 2021 - Retrospectively registered.

Systemic sclerosis and cancer.

To review recent advances and current controversies on the association between systemic sclerosis (SSc) and cancer, PUBMED was searched from 1966 to the present using the terms: systemic sclerosis, cancer, morphoea, sclerotic diseases. Malignancies, mainly in lung and breast, coexist with idiopathic SSc or with SSc-like disorders, but not with localized forms of scleroderma (morphoea), with the exception of squamous cell carcinoma in patients with pansclerotic morphoea and skin ulcers. The mechanisms connecting SSc and malignancies are unknown. The occurrence of different cancer types with SSc or SSc-like disorders suggest different underlying mechanisms, including altered immune response, common genetic and environmental links, disease-dependent factors, tumor-derived biologic substances and therapies. The process of sclerosis itself may favour cancer in certain sites, and a reaction between T cells and neoantigens formed during irradiation has been suggested to explain the frequent development of morphoea after breast irradiation. Radiotherapy, especially when used for breast cancer, may trigger idiopathic SSc or morphoea and influence the severity of preexisting SSc, with the consequence that SSc is considered a relative contraindication to breast radiotherapy. In conclusion, cancer and SSc may be associated, but it is still controversial as to whether there is a causal relationship. Continuing interest in these associations, in particular in the different modalities of associations, may help to understand the underlying biological mechanisms and to identify patients at risk.

Myocardial involvement in systemic sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: To identify clinical and/or laboratory characteristics that could be risk factors for myocardial microvascular involvement in patients with SSc. METHODS: Twenty-one SSc patients, clinically silent for cardiovascular disease, were consecutively evaluated for myocardial perfusion defects through 99m-Tc sestamibi gated myocardial perfusion SPECT with a stress-rest protocol. RESULTS: Eight patients (38%) had myocardial perfusion defects. Perfusion defects were related to skin scores (P < 0.0001), digital ulcers (P = 0.02) and oesophageal involvement (P = 0.046). A trend for anti-Scl 70 antibody positivity was observed in these patients (P = 0.09). Three SPECT-positive patients had re-establishment of normal myocardial perfusion after a course of prostanoid therapy. There were no significant associations between myocardial involvement and age, sex, diffuse/limited SSc, duration of RP or lung involvement. CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial perfusion defects in SSc patients are frequent, and the presence of severe skin thickness, digital ulcers and perhaps oesophageal involvement might warrant screening for myocardial involvement. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the effect of prostanoid therapy on myocardial perfusion.

Interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis.

Interstitial lung disease is an early and serious complication of systemic sclerosis (SSc). Because it may be asymptomatic for a long period, and only the early flogistic phase is at present susceptible to treatment, early diagnosis and identification of risk are critical to the outcome. However, identifying SSc patients at risk for developing interstitial lung disease is at present difficult; therefore, a strict monitoring of the disease, especially in the first years, is mandatory. Treatment strategy is aimed at suppressing inflammation. Unfortunately, optimal therapy has not yet been established. Combination of corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide is considered the best therapeutic approach available so far, but doses and duration of treatment need to be determined. Future research should focus on new anti-inflammatory or immunosuppressive agents.