Transradial Transcapitate Perilunotriquetral Coalition Fracture Dislocation.

Perilunate fracture dislocations (PLFDs) are uncommon, usually resulting from high-energy trauma. Several classification systems describe the patterns of injury seen, but there is still significant variation and patterns of injury that do not fit within these classifications continue to be described. Carpal coalitions are rare, mostly asymptomatic, and are, as a result, usually identified incidentally. We describe the case of a transradial transcapitate PLFD in a patient with a Minnaar Type 3 lunotriquetral coalition. Radiographic, clinical, and patient-reported outcomes are reported. When presented with a rare anatomical variation in the context of a complex injury, the importance of managing these complex injuries according to principles is highlighted.

Preiser's Disease-Current Concepts of Etiology and Management.

The term Preiser's disease typically is used to describe idiopathic avascular necrosis of the scaphoid, but there have been a number of putative etiologies considered. It is rare and the natural history is not fully understood. Management of the condition should be based on patient factors as well as the stage of disease with regard to the scaphoid and the surrounding wrist. This chapter appraises the available evidence and aims to provide the reader with a framework to manage this rare condition.

Biomechanical comparison of transosseous cortical button and Footprint repair techniques for acute distal biceps tendon ruptures.

BACKGROUND: The biceps brachii is the main forearm supinator, which is a direct consequence of its anatomic arrangement. The primary aim of distal biceps rupture is to restore supination strength and function. Cadaveric studies demonstrate that anatomic repairs significantly improve the supination moment when compared to more anterior repairs; however, this has not been tested in the clinical setting. The aim of this study was to compare biomechanical and clinical outcomes of an anatomic repair (Footprint), with a widely used transosseous technique (Endobutton). METHODS: Twenty-two patients were retrospectively identified from a clinical database (11 Footprint versus 11 Endobutton). Biomechanical performance of strength and endurance for flexion and supination was assessed using a validated isokinetic dynamometry protocol and clinical outcome scores (Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score) were collected for all patients. RESULTS: For supination, the Footprint group demonstrated a superior trend for all biomechanical parameters tested. This was statistically significant for mean peak torque, total work of maximal repetition and work in the last third of repetitive testing (p = 0.031, p = 0.036 and p = 0.048). For flexion, the Footprint group demonstrated a superior trend for all biomechanical parameters tested but this was only statistically significant for work in the last third of repetitive testing (p = 0.039). The clinical outcomes were good or excellent for all patients in both groups. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to demonstrate that an anatomic Footprint repair restores superior biomechanical supination strength and endurance compared to a conventional Endobutton technique in a clinical setting. Both techniques, however, provide good or excellent clinical outcomes.