Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block for Pain Management Following Thoracotomy for Aortic Coarctectomy.

Pain following thoracotomy is one of the most severe forms of postoperative pain. Post-thoracotomy pain may increase the risk of post-surgical pulmonary complications, postoperative mortality, prolong hospitalization, and increase utilization of healthcare resources. To mitigate these effects, anesthesia providers commonly employ continuous epidural infusions, paravertebral blocks, and systemic opioids for pain management and improvement of pulmonary mechanics. We report the use of a continuous erector spinae plane block (ESPB) via a peripheral nerve catheter for postoperative pain management of an 18-year-old patient who underwent complex aortic coarctation repair via lateral thoracotomy, aided by cardiopulmonary bypass. Continuous ESPB proved to be an acceptable alternative for postoperative pain control, producing a substantial multi-dermatomal sensory block, resulting in adequate pain control, reduced opioid consumption, and a potentially shorter hospital stay.

Epidural Abscess Complicating Tunneled Caudal Epidural Catheter in an Infant for Postoperative Pain Management of Open Abdominal Surgery.

Regional anesthesia is being used more frequently in pediatric anesthesia practice, including the perioperative care of neonates and infants. Adverse effects may be encountered during epidural needle placement, with catheter advancement, or subsequently during infusion of local anesthetic agents. Despite applying standard practice of care regarding placement of epidural catheter, epidural catheter-related infections may still occur. We present the rare occurrence of an epidural abscess in a 4-month-old infant after placement and subsequent use of a tunneled caudal epidural catheter for postoperative pain management following abdominal surgery. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was the gold standard diagnostic imaging modality and was used to identify the abscess. Management included intravenous antibiotic therapy as well as hemilaminectomy with evacuation of the epidural abscess and hematoma. The patient continued to progress well with no deficits noted on neurological examination. There were no other postoperative concerns. When there is a concern for epidural catheter-related infection, the catheter should be removed immediately. The epidural catheter tip as well as any purulent discharge from the insertion site should be sent for culture and sensitivity. Urgent neurosurgical and infectious disease consultation is suggested to provide opinions regarding surgical intervention and antibiotic therapy.

Intermittent Cerebrospinal Leak After Inadvertent Dural Puncture During Epidural Catheter Placement for Postoperative Analgesia.

Regional anesthesia is being used more frequently in pediatric anesthesia practice, including the perioperative care of neonates and infants. Adverse effects may be encountered during epidural needle placement, with catheter advancement, or subsequently during infusion of local anesthetic agents. We present the rare occurrence of a persistent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak following inadvertent dural puncture (wet tap) during attempted placement of an epidural catheter in a 6-year-old child. Potential adverse effects of epidural anesthesia in children are discussed, and options for treatment of a persistent CSF leak after inadvertent dural puncture are reviewed.

Use of a Spinal-Caudal Epidural Technique for Abdominal Surgery in a Newborn With Noonan Syndrome and Severe Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Features of Noonan syndrome include a distinctive facial appearance, short stature, a broad or webbed neck, congenital heart disease, bleeding problems, skeletal malformations, and developmental delay. Although pulmonary stenosis is most commonly reported, up to 20% of patients have hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). We report the use of a combined spinal-caudal epidural anesthesia technique during urologic surgery (pyeloplasty) in an 8-week-old infant with Noonan syndrome and HCM. A spinal-caudal epidural technique provides favorable hemodynamic conditions, avoids the need for airway instrumentation, and may serve as an alternative to general anesthesia in these high risk patients.

Ambulatory spinal anesthesia in infants ≤ six months of age: A retrospective review of outcomes and safety.

PURPOSE: To review experience with outpatient spinal anesthesia (SA) from a single center in infants ≤6 months of age. METHODS: Retrospective review of all SAs performed in the ambulatory setting in the outpatient surgery centers in infants ≤6 months of age from 2016 to 2020, focusing on success rate, adverse events, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) times, and emergency department (ED) or urgent care (UC) returns within 7 days of the operation. RESULTS: The study cohort included 175 SAs performed on 173 patients ≤6 months of age. One hundred and sixty-two patients (93%) were able to undergo their respective surgical procedures under SA without conversion to general anesthesia. One hundred and thirty-six patients (78%) did not require additional sedation or analgesic agents. The median time from entering the operating room until the start of surgical procedure was 17 min. One hundred and twenty-six patients (72%) were able to bypass Phase I of the PACU. One hundred and forty-seven patients (86%) were discharged in less than two hours postoperatively. Only one complication related to SA was noted. This was a patient who returned on postoperative day 2 with a possible CSF leak noted by ultrasound. After overnight hospital floor admission, he was discharged the next day after receiving intravenous fluids without further sequelae. CONCLUSIONS: SA is a viable option for anesthetic care in infants ≤6 months of age presenting for outpatient surgery. Advantages included the ability to bypass PACU Phase I and facilitation of hospital discharge. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV. Retrospective cohort treatment study.

Adverse Events in Infants Less Than 6 Months of Age After Ambulatory Surgery and Diagnostic Imaging Requiring Anesthesia.

AAP guidelines recommend infants less than 6 months of age are monitored for at least 2 hours following surgery. This retrospective study evaluated if adherence to the 2-hour monitoring guideline decreased the risk of adverse events associated with ambulatory procedures in infants younger than 6 months. Methods: We queried the hospital's electronic medical record to identify patients younger than 6 months of age who received anesthetic care from January 2015 to March 2020. Demographic data, intraoperative adverse events, and returns to the emergency department (ED) or urgent care within 7 days were captured for each patient. We calculated the number and frequency for categorical data and median and interquartile range (IQR) for continuous data. Chi-square or Fisher's exact test were used to compare patients who experienced an adverse event to those that did not. Results: One thousand one hundred seventy-seven patients who had 1,261 unique anesthetic encounters were analyzed. Forty-four adverse events were identified, 20 (1.6%) before discharge, including 3 unplanned admissions, and 24 (1.9%) returns to the ED/UC within 7 days postoperatively. We did not observe differences in postoperative recovery time in patients who experienced an adverse event and those who did not (88 min vs. 77 min, respectively, P = 0.078). None of the ED/UC returns would have been avoided by a longer PACU stay. Conclusions: With the appropriate patient selection, once physiological discharge readiness is met, adherence to a strict 2-hour time-based discharge criteria does not increase safety for infants younger than 6 months of age after ambulatory procedures.

Characterization of the Difficult Peripheral IV in the Perioperative Setting: A Prospective, Observational Study of Intravenous Access for Pediatric Patients Undergoing Anesthesia.

Background: Various criteria exist for defining difficult intravenous access (DIVA) in infants and children. The current study evaluated the factors associated with DIVA in a prospective cohort of over 1000 infants and children presenting for anesthetic care. Methods: This was a prospective, observational study of patients aged 0 to 18 years undergoing elective surgical or radiologic procedures under general anesthesia. Prior to the initial attempt at peripheral intravenous (PIV) cannulation, the anticipated difficulty of PIV catheter placement was determined by the provider using a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 1 to 10. The number of attempts was recorded as well as the time required to achieve PIV access. DIVA was defined as requiring three or more attempts. After successful cannulation, the actual difficulty of the PIV placement was assessed by the provider and recorded using the same VAS. Patient characteristics, including age, race, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical classification, and history of difficult PIV placement, were evaluated as covariates. Results: In our cohort of 1002 pediatric patients, 78% of patients were successfully cannulated in a single attempt and 91% of patients were successfully cannulated in two or fewer attempts. Factors associated with requiring three or more PIV attempts included younger age (OR 8.73; 95% CI: 3.38, 22.6 for age <1 year and OR 4.93; 95% CI: 2.05, 11.8 for age 1-3 years), higher ASA physical classification (OR 1.95; 95% CI: 1.10, 3.46 for ASA II), and prior history of difficult PIV placement (OR 3.46; 95% CI: 1.70, 7.08). BMI, racial category or gender were not independent predictors of DIVA. Conclusion: We found that approximately 9% of patients required three or more attempts at IV placement in the operating room. Patients that required multiple PIV attempts were more likely to be younger, have a higher ASA classification or a history of difficult PIV placement.

Association of Sugammadex or Neostigmine With Major Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Children.

BACKGROUND: Recent data in adult patients indicate that the use of sugammadex compared to neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular block (NMB) was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of composite postoperative pulmonary complications. Despite the clinical significance of pulmonary complications in children, studies exploring the role of NMB reversal in the risk of these complications are currently unavailable. METHOD: We performed a propensity score-matched retrospective study using the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) dataset spanning the years 2016 and 2020. We studied children <18 years who underwent elective, inpatient, noncardiac surgical procedures and received either neostigmine or sugammadex for reversal of NMB. Our primary outcome was major postoperative pulmonary complication, which we defined as the occurrence of either postoperative pneumonia or respiratory failure. RESULTS: Our study included a study population of 33,819 children, of whom 23,312 (68.9%) received neostigmine and 10,507 (31.1%) received sugammadex. After propensity score matching (10,361 matched from each group), we found no evidence of a statistically significant association between the NMB reversal agent and the incidence of pulmonary complications (3.1% vs 3.1%; odds ratio [OR], 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78-1.05; P = .19). The components of pulmonary complications, including respiratory failure and pneumonia, were not statistically associated with the choice of NMB reversal agent. CONCLUSIONS: Choice of NMB reversal agent does not appear to impact the incidence of major postoperative pulmonary complications. Further research is needed to determine whether our results carry forth across subpopulations defined by surgical specialty, the presence of complex chronic conditions, and anesthesia technique.

Continuous epidural chloroprocaine after abdominal surgery is associated with lower postoperative opioid exposure in NICU infants.

BACKGROUND: Epidural anesthesia in infants undergoing open abdominal surgery has the potential to reduce opioid consumption, lower pain scores, and expedite tracheal extubation. We evaluated associations between use of continuous epidural chloroprocaine and improved intra- and post-operative outcomes. METHODS: This matched retrospective cohort study first identified 24 patients who between April 2018 through December 2019 were treated with a caudal catheter and epidural chloroprocaine infusion for a laparotomy at postnatal age of 6 months or less. A matched comparator group of 24 patients was derived based on age and type of surgery. Exclusion criteria were the presence of a preoperative opioid infusion, comorbidities that would preclude appropriate pain assessment, or a recent surgical procedure. Primary outcomes included opioid consumption and pain scores; we secondarily analyzed intraoperative anesthetic requirements, other systemic analgesic use, vital signs, tracheal extubation time, and procedural times. RESULTS: Treatment with epidural anesthesia was associated with lower 5-day total postoperative opioid consumption (3.2 mg/kg vs. 19.7 mg/kg in the respective epidural vs. systemic groups, p = 0.001) and time to tracheal extubation (1.3 days vs. 3.2 days, p = 0.005). Any statistically significant differences in pain scores were not clinically meaningful. There were no differences in mean arterial pressure or intraoperative inhaled anesthetic doses. CONCLUSION: Continuous infusion of epidural chloroprocaine in infants following open abdominal surgery may limit exposure to systemic opioid medications while providing adequate postoperative analgesia and shortening time to tracheal extubation.

Incidence and Causes of Adverse Events in Diagnostic Radiological Studies Requiring Anesthesia in the Wake-Up Safe Registry.

OBJECTIVES: General anesthesia or sedation can facilitate the completion of diagnostic radiological studies in children. We evaluated the incidence, predictors, and causes of adverse events (AEs) when general anesthesia is provided for diagnostic radiological imaging. METHODS: Deidentified data from 24 pediatric tertiary care hospitals participating in the Wake-Up Safe registry during 2010-2015 were obtained for analysis. Children 18 years or younger receiving general anesthesia for radiological procedures were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes, and reported AEs were analyzed if they were associated with anesthetic care at magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography locations. Logistic regression was used to determine predictors of AE occurrence in cases with complete covariate data. RESULTS: We identified 175,486 anesthetics for diagnostic radiological exams, compared with 83 AEs in magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography locations (AE incidence of 0.05%). In multivariable analysis, AEs were more likely among patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status IV compared with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I patients (adjusted odds ratio, 8.9; 95% confidence interval, 2.8-28.0; P < 0.001). Twenty-three AEs resulted in harm to the patient, whereas 32 AEs required unplanned hospital or intensive care unit admission. Anesthetic complications or issues were the most common cause of AEs (n = 52). CONCLUSIONS: Anesthesia provided for pediatric radiological studies is very safe and with an overall low AE incidence. The contribution of anesthetic complications to reported AEs suggests opportunities for further process improvement in this setting.

Perioperative anaphylaxis in children: A report from the Wake-Up Safe collaborative.

BACKGROUND: Anaphylactic reactions to antigens in the perioperative environment are uncommon, but they have a potential to lead to serious morbidity and/or mortality. The incidence of anaphylactic reactions is 1:37 000 pediatric anesthetics, and substantially less than the 1:10 000 to 1:20 000 incidence in the adult population. Neuromuscular blocking agents, latex, and antibiotics are the most frequently cited triggers. To date, there is no comprehensive report on perioperative anaphylactic reactions in children in the United States. Using the Wake-up Safe database, we examined the incidence and consequences of reported perioperative anaphylaxis events. METHODS: We reviewed the Wake-up Safe database from 2010 to 2017 and identified all reported instances of anaphylaxis. The triggering agent, timing, and location of the registered event, severity of patient harm, and preventability were identified. Narrative review of free-text comments entered by reporting centers was performed to determine presenting symptoms, and interventions required. Type of case was identified from procedure codes provided in mandatory fields. RESULTS: Among 2 261 749 cases reported to the Wake-up Safe database during the study period, perioperative anaphylactic reactions occurred in 1:36 479 (0.003%). Antibiotics, neuromuscular blocking agents, and opioid analgesics were the main triggers. Forty-nine cases (79%) occurred in the operating room, and 13 cases (21%) occurred in off-site locations. Seven (11%) patients required cardiopulmonary resuscitation following the onset of symptoms. Thirty-five (57%) patients were treated with epinephrine or epinephrine plus other medications, whereas 5% were managed only with phenylephrine. Most cases (97%) required escalation of care after the event. Regarding case preventability, 91% of cases were marked as either "likely could not have been prevented" or "almost certainly could not have been prevented." CONCLUSION: The estimated incidence of anaphylaxis and inciting agents among the pediatric population in this study were consistent with the most recent published studies outside of the United States; however, new findings included need for cardiopulmonary resuscitation in 11% of cases, and estimated fatality of 1.6%. The management of perioperative anaphylaxis could be improved for some cases as epinephrine was not administered, or its administration was delayed. Fewer than half of reported cases had additional investigation to formally identify the responsible agent.

A Survey to Define and Predict Difficult Vascular Access in the Pediatric Perioperative Population.

BACKGROUND: Various criteria exist for defining difficult peripheral intravenous (DPIV) cannulation in infants and children. With the help of a survey tool, the characteristics perceived to increase the likelihood of DPIV cannulation amongst anesthesia providers were assessed. METHODS: An individualized survey regarding DPIV which included pediatric anesthesiology faculty and certified registered nurse anesthetists at Nationwide Children's Hospital and anesthesiology faculty members of Wake-up Safe was conducted. Anesthesia provider, patient, and procedural characteristics were expressed as a count and percentage, and compared according to group (faculty, certified registered nurse anesthetists, Wake-up Safe faculty) using analysis of variance. RESULTS: Of the 48 local respondents, 33 (69%) reported age as a contributing factor to DPIV, and 32 (67%) reported weight as a factor. Of the 22 Wake-up Safe respondents, 14 (63%) reported age, and 16 (73%) reported weight as a factor. Patient and procedural characteristics perceived to increased likelihood of DPIV cannulation did not differ by respondent role. The factors most commonly mentioned by local respondents as contributing to DPIV included trisomy 21, neuromuscular disorders, and history of many prior IV cannulations. Among the Wake-up Safe faculty respondents, the most commonly mentioned factors were neuromuscular disorders, trisomy 21, and skin injuries or conditions. CONCLUSION: Age and weight were the two most commonly reported factors from both groups of respondents. Other factors contributing to DPIV included prior history of DPIV, neuromuscular disorders, trisomy 21 and American Society of Anesthesiology status ≥4. Patient and procedural characteristics were perceived to increase the likelihood of DPIV cannulation with no difference among respondents.

Perioperative aspiration events in children: A report from the Wake Up Safe Collaborative.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative aspiration, while rare, is a serious complication of anesthetic care. Consequences of aspiration may include physical obstruction, wheezing, and pneumonia, resulting in mild to severe hypoxemia and even death. AIM: We used a multi-institutional registry of pediatric patients to identify factors that influence the rate and resulting harm of perioperative pulmonary aspiration. METHODS: The Wake Up Safe registry was queried for all severe adverse events reported from 29 institutions from 2010 to 2017. Aspiration events were identified through the "respiratory adverse event" data entry form or through free text search. Multivariable regression was used to predict aspiration events, and contributory factors were identified by reviewing free text case comments. RESULTS: Analysis included 2 440 810 anesthetics administered involving patients ≤18 years of age. There were 135 pulmonary aspiration events, for an incidence of 0.006%. Within these 135 cases, 110 cases (82%) resulted in escalation of care and 51 (38%) resulted in patient harm, including 2 deaths (1.5%). In multivariable analysis, patients undergoing emergency surgery (OR 2.0 [1.2-3.5]) or with higher ASA status were more likely to experience aspiration (ASA 3 (OR 5.0 [2.6-9.1]); ASA ≥ 4 (OR 5.5 [3.8-16.8])). Noted causes of aspiration included gastrointestinal comorbid conditions (19%), postcoughing event or laryngospasm (14%), nil per os (NPO) violation (11%), blood or secretions in the airway following or during the procedure (6%), and oral premedication reaction (3%). CONCLUSION: Although infrequent, death was reported as a consequence of perioperative aspiration in two patients. The frequency with which NPO violations were identified as a potential cause of aspiration highlights the struggles institutions face with adherence to NPO regulations, as these cases may be preventable. Furthermore, preventive measures may be needed to address other common causes of aspiration, such as gastrointestinal comorbid conditions.

Regional Anesthesia for Pain Management After Orthopedic Procedures for Treatment of Lower Extremity Length Discrepancy.

INTRODUCTION: The use of regional anesthesia techniques continues to expand in a wide variety of surgical procedures as the benefits and safety are increasingly appreciated. Limb-lengthening procedures are often associated with significant postoperative pain and high opioid requirements which may impact patient's recovery and increase risk of chronic pain and long-term opioid use. METHODS: The current study retrospectively reviews our experience utilizing a novel peripheral nerve catheter (PNC) protocol for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing elective limb-lengthening procedures. We measure total opioid consumption following 48 hrs in the postoperative period between groups. RESULTS: A total of 70 patients were included from which 41 received general plus regional anesthesia (RA) and 29 were managed with general anesthesia alone (NORA). Postoperative pain needs were calculated as morphine equivalents (ME). There were no differences in the demographic characteristics between the groups. Over the first 48 postoperative hours, opioid use was 0.5 mg/kg ME (IQR 0.3, 0.9) in the RA group versus 1.7 mg/kg ME (IQR 1.1, 3.1) in the NORA group (p<0.001). Subgroup analysis between femoral lengthening and tibial-fibular lengthening procedures demonstrated the same opioid-sparing effect favoring the RA group compared to the NORA group. Hospital length of stay was significantly shorter in the femoral lengthening RA group compared to NORA group (32 hrs [IQR 29, 35] versus 53 hrs [IQR 33, 55], respectively). There was no significant difference in length of stay between the RA group and NORA group after tibial-fibular lengthening procedures. DISCUSSION: Regional anesthesia via continuous catheter infusions has a clinically significant opioid-sparing effect for postoperative pain management after limb-lengthening procedures and may facilitate earlier hospital discharge.

Evaluation of postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients after hip surgery: lumbar plexus versus caudal epidural analgesia.

Background:There continues to be focus on the value of regional and neuraxial anesthetic techniques when combined with general anesthesia to improve postoperative analgesia. The reported advantages include decreased postoperative opioid requirements, decreased medication-related adverse effects, decreased hospital length of stay, and increased patient satisfaction. Orthopedic procedures of the hip may be amenable to such techniques as there is significant postoperative pain with the requirement for hospital admission and the administration of parenteral opioids. Given the surgical site, various regional anesthetic techniques may be used to provide analgesia including caudal epidural anesthesia (CEA) or lumbar plexus blockade (LPB). Purpose: The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of LPB versus CEA as an analgesic thechnique for patients undergoing elective hip surgery from the opioid consumption and pain scores perspective. Patients and methods : The current study retrospectively reviews our experience with CEA and LPB for postoperative analgesia after hip surgery in the pediatric population. Regional anesthesia technique was reviewed as well as opioid requirements and pain scores. Results: The study cohort included 61 patients, 29 who received an LPB and 32 who received CEA. No difference was noted in the demographics between the two groups. Intraoperative opioid use was 0.7 (IQR: 0.5, 1.1) mg/kg of oral morphine equivalents (MEs) in the LPB group compared to 0.6 (IQR: 0.5, 0.9) in the CEA group (p=0.479). Postoperative opioid use over the first 48 hrs was 4 (IQR: 1, 6) mg/kg of oral ME in the LPB group, compared to 2 (interquartile range [IQR]: 1, 3) in the CEA group (p=0.103). Over the first 24 hrs after surgery, the median pain score in the LPB group was 5 (IQR: 1-6), compared to 3 (IQR: 0, 5) in the CEA group (p=0.014).Conclusion: These retrospective data suggest a modest postoperative benefit of CEA when compared to LPB following hip surgery in the pediatric population. Postoperative pain scores were lower in patients receiving CEA; however, no difference in the intraoperative or postoperative opioid requirements was noted between the two groups.

Severe outcomes of pediatric perioperative adverse events occurring in operating rooms compared to off-site anesthetizing locations in the Wake Up Safe Database.

BACKGROUND: Anesthesia services are frequently provided outside of the traditional operating room environment for children. It is unclear if adverse events which occur in off-site anesthetizing locations result in more severe outcomes compared to events in traditional operating rooms. AIM: We used a multi-institutional registry of pediatric patients to compare outcomes of perioperative adverse events between location types. METHODS: De-identified data from 24 pediatric tertiary care hospitals participating in the Wake Up Safe registry during 2010-2015 were analyzed. Peri-procedural adverse events occurring in operating rooms or off-site locations were included. The primary outcome was whether the adverse event was severe, defined as requiring escalation of care or resulting in temporary or significant harm. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare location type (operating room vs. off-site) and the likelihood of a severe outcome among reported events. RESULTS: There were 1594 adverse events, of which 362 were associated with off-site anesthetizing locations. In multivariable logistic regression, off-site location was associated with greater odds of severe adverse event outcome (adjusted odds ratio, 1.31; 95% confidence interval: 1.01, 1.69; P = 0.044). Comparing adverse events in cardiac catheterization suites to events in operating rooms confirmed higher odds of severe outcome in the former group (adjusted odds ratio = 1.48; 95% confidence interval: 1.05, 2.08; P = 0.025), while this difference was not found for other off-site locations. CONCLUSION: Multivariable analysis of a large registry revealed a greater likelihood of severe outcome for adverse events occurring in cardiac catheterization suites (but not other out of the OR sites), compared to adverse events occurring in the operating room. Additional prospective studies are needed which better control for patient and environmental characteristics and their effect on severe outcomes after anesthesia.

Perioperative Management and In-Hospital Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Repair of Pectus Excavatum: A Multicenter Registry Report From the Society for Pediatric Anesthesia Improvement Network.

BACKGROUND: There are few comparative data on the analgesic options used to manage patients undergoing minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE). The Society for Pediatric Anesthesia Improvement Network was established to investigate outcomes for procedures where there is significant management variability. For our first study, we established a multicenter observational database to characterize the analgesic strategies used to manage pediatric patients undergoing MIRPE. Outcome data from the participating centers were used to assess the association between analgesic strategy and pain outcomes. METHODS: Fourteen institutions enrolled patients from June 2014 through August 2015. Network members agreed to an observational methodology where each institution managed patients based on their institutional standards and protocols. There was no requirement to standardize care. Patients were categorized based on analgesic strategy: epidural catheter (EC), paravertebral catheter (PVC), wound catheter (WC), no regional (NR) analgesia, and intrathecal morphine techniques. Primary outcomes, pain score and opioid consumption by postoperative day (POD), for each technique were compared while adjusting for confounders using multivariable modeling that included 5 covariates: age, sex, number of bars, Haller index, and use of preoperative pain medication. Pain scores were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction. Opioid consumption was analyzed using a multivariable quantile regression. RESULTS: Data were collected on 348 patients and categorized based on primary analgesic strategy: EC (122), PVC (57), WC (41), NR (120), and intrathecal morphine (8). Compared to EC, daily median pain scores were higher in patients managed with PVC (POD 0), WC (POD 0, 1, 2, 3), and NR (POD 0, 1, 2), respectively (P < .001-.024 depending on group). Daily opioid requirements were higher in patients managed with PVC (POD 0, 1), WC (POD 0, 1, 2), and NR (POD 0, 1, 2) when compared to patients managed with EC (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate variation in pain management strategies for patients undergoing MIRPE within our network. The results indicate that most patients have mild-to-moderate pain postoperatively regardless of analgesic management. Patients managed with EC had lower pain scores and opioid consumption in the early recovery period compared to other treatment strategies.

Management Challenges in an Infant With Pentalogy of Cantrell, Giant Anterior Encephalocele, and Craniofacial Anomalies: A Case Report.

Pentalogy of Cantrell is a rare syndrome consisting of midline abnormalities involving the heart, sternum, abdominal wall, and the anterior and pericardial diaphragm. This combination of defects places patients at particular perioperative risk and requires individualized management during anesthetic care. The following report documents the management of a patient with pentalogy of Cantrell, whose condition was further complicated by severe midline craniofacial abnormalities, including large anterior encephalocele, deficient mandible, tethered tongue, and cleft palate. The case offers insight into the complexity of care in this unique patient population.

Dura to spinal cord distance at different vertebral levels in children and its implications on epidural analgesia: A retrospective MRI-based study.

BACKGROUND: The distance from the dura to spinal cord is not uniform at different vertebral levels. The dura to spinal cord distance may be a critical factor in avoiding the potential for neurological injury caused by needle trauma after a dural puncture. Typically, the greater the dura to spinal cord distance, the larger the potential safety margin. The objective of our study is to measure dura to spinal cord distance at two thoracic levels T6 -7 , T9 -10 , and one lumbar level L1 -2 using MRI images. METHODS: Eighty-eight children under the age of 8 years old qualified for the study. The distance from dural side of ligamentum flavum to the posterior margin of the spinal cord was defined as dura to spinal cord distance. Sagittal T2 -weighted images of the thoracic and lumbar spine were used to measure the dura to spinal cord distance at the T6-7 , T9-10 , and L1-2 interspaces. Measurements were taken perpendicular to long axis of the vertebral body at each level. RESULTS: The dura to spinal cord distance was 5.9 ± 1.6 mm at T6-7 (range: 1.4-9.9 mm), 5.0 ± 1.6 mm at T9-10 (1.2-8.1 mm), and 3.6 ± 1.2 mm at L1-2 (1.2-6.8 mm). There were no evident differences in dura to spinal cord distance by gender, age, height, or weight. CONCLUSION: The present study reports that the largest dura to spinal cord distance is found at the T5-6 level, and the shortest dura to spinal cord distance at the L1-2 level. There appears to be substantially more room in the dorsal subarachnoid space at the thoracic level. The risk of spinal cord damage resulting from accidental epidural needle advancement may be greater in the lumbar region due to a more dorsal location of the spinal cord in the vertebral canal compared to the thoracic region.