[Study of the resistome of human microbial communities using a targeted panel of antibiotic resistance genes in COVID-19 patients].

AIM: To study overall drug resistance genes (resistome) in the human gut microbiome and the changes in these genes during COVID-19 in-hospital therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted. Only cases with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 RNA using polymerase chain reaction in oro-/nasopharyngeal swab samples were subject to analysis. The patients with a documented history of or current comorbidities of the hepatobiliary system, malignant neoplasms of any localization, systemic and autoimmune diseases, as well as pregnant women were excluded. Feces were collected from all study subjects for subsequent metagenomic sequencing. The final cohort was divided into two groups depending on the disease severity: mild (group 1) and severe (group 2). Within group 2, five subgroups were formed, depending on the use of antibacterial drugs (ABD): group 2A (receiving ABD), group 2AC (receiving ABD before hospitalization), group 2AD (receiving ABD during hospitalization), group 2AE (receiving ABD during and before hospitalization), group 2B (not receiving ABD). RESULTS: The median number of antibiotic resistance (ABR) genes (cumulative at all time points) was significantly higher in the group of patients treated with ABD: 81.0 (95% CI 73.8-84.5) vs. 51.0 (95% CI 31.1-68.4). In the group of patients treated with ABD (2A), the average number of multidrug resistance genes (efflux systems) was significantly higher than in controls (group 2B): 47.0 (95% CI 46.0-51.2) vs. 21.5 (95% CI 7.0-43.9). Patients with severe coronavirus infection tended to have a higher median number of ABR genes but without statistical significance. Patients in the severe COVID-19 group who did not receive ABD before and during hospitalization also had more resistance genes than the patients in the comparison group. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that fewer ABR genes were identified in the group with a milder disease than in the group with a more severe disease associated with more ABR genes, with the following five being the most common: SULI, MSRC, ACRE, EFMA, SAT.

[Prospects and possibilities for the treatment of patients with long COVID-19 syndrome].

AIM: To study the efficacy and safety of a drug product based on the succinic acid complex with trimethylhydrazine used to treat patients with asthenic syndrome after a new coronavirus infection (COVID-19). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, comparative, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the safety and efficacy of sequential therapy with Brainmax® enrolled 160 patients 12-16 weeks after coronavirus infection (no more than 12 months). The study was conducted at 6 healthcare centers in different regions of the Russian Federation. At the enrollment, clinical and neurological examination and the following tests were performed: complete blood count, urinalysis, blood chemistry, coagulation test, pulse oximetry, electrocardiography, glomerular filtration rate calculation (according to Cockcroft-Gault formula) were performed. Also, the patients were assessed using the following tools: VAS headache rating scale, MFI-20 asthenia scale, PSQI index, FAS-10 fatigue assessment scale, Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), MoCA-test for cognitive impairment assessment, Beck Anxiety Inventory, Kérdö Autonomic Index. RESULTS: The primary endpoint was the mean reduction in the MFI-20 asthenia scale score after the therapy (Visit 5, 41st day of therapy) compared to data from Visit 0 (beginning of therapy). A clinically significant advantage of the study drug versus the placebo was demonstrated, with a median absolute change in the MFI-20 score of -19.5 [-27; -11] points in the Brainmax® drug group and -3 [-7; 1] score in the placebo group (p<0.001). A significant sleep quality improvement according to the PSQI index was shown in the study group: by -2.5 [-4; -1] points versus no improvement in the placebo group (0 [-3; 0], p<0,001). Significant differences were also noted for the following secondary endpoints: PSQI sleep quality scale, FAS-10 fatigue assessment scale, DHI, and Beck Anxiety and Depression Inventory. There was also a decrease in patients' complaints of cognitive deterioration according to the CGI scale. CONCLUSION: Our study clearly demonstrated the efficacy and high safety profile of Brainmax® in a representative sample of patients with the post-COVID syndrome.