Quantitative texture-based analysis of pulmonary parenchymal features on chest CT: comparison with densitometric indices and short-term effect of changes in smoking habit.

PURPOSE: To investigate the correlations between densitometric and Computer Aided Lung Informatics for Pathology Evaluation and Rating (CALIPER)-derived indices of pulmonary emphysema and their change in the short-term period for groups of patients with different smoking habits. METHOD: This retrospective study included 284 subjects from the ITALUNG trial (198 men and 86 women; mean±sd age 60±4 years) who underwent low-dose chest computed tomography at baseline and 2-year follow-up. Subjects were divided into four groups (persistent smokers, restarters, quitters and former smokers) according to their smoking habit at baseline and follow-up. Densitometric and texture analyses were performed, using CALIPER software. A correlation analysis was conducted between CALIPER-derived low-attenuation areas (LAAs) and densitometric indices, including the 15th percentile of the whole-lung attenuation histogram (Perc15) and the relative areas with density ≤-950 HU (RA950). Densitometric indices and LAAs were evaluated at baseline and variation assessed longitudinally with comparisons between groups with different smoking habit. Further analysis of parenchymal changes per pulmonary zone was performed. RESULTS: LAAs were strongly correlated with Perc15 (rs=0.81; p<0.001) and RA950 (rs=0.905; p<0.001). At baseline, the group of smokers showed higher Perc15, lower RA950, lower LAAs (particularly mild sub-class of LAAs) than the group of ex-smokers (p<0.001). At 2-year follow-up, densitometric indices and LAAs increased in persistent smokers, former smokers and quitters (p<0.05). The progression was larger and statistically more significant in quitters (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: CALIPER texture analysis provides an objective measure comparable to traditional density/histogram features to assess the lung parenchymal changes in relation to different smoking habits.

CT colonography with rectal iodine tagging: Feasibility and comparison with oral tagging in a colorectal cancer screening population.

PURPOSE: To evaluate feasibility, diagnostic performance, patient acceptance, and overall examination time of CT colonography (CTC) performed through rectal administration of iodinated contrast material. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six-hundred asymptomatic subjects (male:female=270:330; mean 63 years) undergoing CTC for colorectal cancer screening on an individual basis were consecutively enrolled in the study. Out of them, 503 patients (group 1) underwent CTC with rectal tagging, of which 55 had a total of 77 colonic lesions. The remaining 97 patients (group 2) were randomly selected to receive CTC with oral tagging of which 15 had a total of 20 colonic lesions. CTC findings were compared with optical colonoscopy, and per-segment image quality was visually assessed using a semi-quantitative score (1=poor, 2=adequate, 3=excellent). In 70/600 patients (11.7%), CTC was performed twice with both types of tagging over a 5-year follow-up cancer screening program. In this subgroup, patient acceptance was rated via phone interview two weeks after CTC using a semi-quantitative scale (1=poor, 2=fair, 3=average, 4=good, 5=excellent). RESULTS: Mean per-polyp sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of CTC with rectal vs oral tagging were 96.1% (CI95% 85.4÷99.3%) vs 89.4% (CI95% 65.4÷98.1%), 95.3% (CI95% 90.7÷97.8%) vs 95.8% (CI95% 87.6÷98.9%), 86.0% (CI95% 73.6÷93.3) vs 85.0% (CI95% 61.1÷96.0%), and 98.8% (CI95% 95.3÷99.8%) vs 97.2% (CI95% 89.4÷99.5%), respectively (p>0.05). Polyp detection rates were not statistically different between groups 1 and 2 (p>0.05). Overall examination time was significantly shorter with rectal than with oral tagging (18.3±3.5 vs 215.6±10.3 minutes, respectively; p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Rectal iodine tagging can be an effective alternative to oral tagging for CTC with the advantages of greater patient acceptance and lower overall examination time.

Omental infarction and its mimics: imaging features of acute abdominal conditions presenting with fat stranding greater than the degree of bowel wall thickening.

The segmental omental infarction is a rare self-limited disorder presenting with aspecific clinical symptoms that may mimic several acute abdominal conditions. Therefore, a correct noninvasive diagnosis is important because treatment approaches range from monitoring to surgery. As omental infarction results in an important fat stranding that is much greater than the degree of bowel wall thickening, it suggests a narrower differential diagnosis: appendicitis, diverticulitis, epiploic appendagitis, and mesenteric panniculitis. In this pictorial essay, we point out the importance of imaging in identifying this typical sign allowing alternate diagnoses such as segmental omental infarction that can be conservatively managed.

Bowel preparation for CT colonography.

Bowel preparation represents an essential part of CT colonography, as the accuracy of the exam is strongly related to the adequacy of colonic cleansing, and a poor bowel preparation may compromise the diagnostic quality even despite optimization of all other acquisition parameters. Residual stool and fluid in the large bowel may affect the interpretation of the exam and may increase the number of false positives and false negatives. In this regard, the majority of patients having undergone CT colonography state that bowel preparation is the most unpleasant part. Unfortunately, to date no definite consensus has been reached about the ideal bowel preparation technique, and there is great variability in preparation strategies across diagnostic centers. The purpose of this review article is to describe the development and evolution of bowel preparation techniques in order to choose the best approach for optimizing the diagnostic quality of CT colonography in each patient.