Drug-Induced Lung Injury in a Liver Transplant Patient Treated With Sofosbuvir.

New direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have dramatically improved sustained virologic response (SVR) rates in patients treated for chronic hepatitis C. Although the safety of these agents has been very good in registration trials, unexpected side effects have been reported after much broader use of DAAs on marketing. We retrospectively examined all liver transplant recipients with chronic hepatitis C that received sofosbuvir-based regimens at our clinic. A total of 24 liver transplant recipients with recurrent chronic hepatitis C had received sofosbuvir up to April 2015. Regimens were as follows: sofosbuvir+simeprevir (8), SOF+ledipasvir (6), sofosbuvir+daclatasvir (5) and sofosbuvir+ribavirin (5). Overall, treatment was very well tolerated with only mild adverse events in 42% of patients. However, a 52-year-old woman developed severe respiratory failure within 10 days after beginning sofosbuvir+daclatasvir. High-resolution computerized tomography showed areas of diffused ground-glass opacities in both lungs, suggesting drug-induced lung injury. The bronchoalveolar lavage showed marked signs of acute inflammation without recovering any infectious agent. The patient was treated with high-dose corticosteroids and steadily recovered. DAA therapy was not discontinued, but sofosbuvir was replaced by simeprevir. She reached sustained virologic response after completing 24 weeks of DAA therapy. Given the close temporal association, radiologic and bronchoalveolar lavage findings, and negative work-up for infectious agents, we postulated that sofosbuvir was the most likely explanation for drug-induced lung injury in our patient.

Correction: Antimicrobial stewardship in patients recently transferred to a ward from the ICU.

UNLABELLED: This paper is a corrigendum to the previously published paper: "Antimicrobial stewardship in patients recently transferred to a ward from the ICU" [Rev Esp Quimioter. 2014 Mar;27(1):46-50.] This corrigendum was prepared in order to correct some erroneous comments included in the discussion section. First, it should be pointed out that there could have been several suitable options for treating many infections and that, therefore, the word "inadequate" was not the most appropriate in this situation. In addition, some comments about the interpretation of microbiological results made by ICU physicians have been removed from the first article because this variable was not included in the study. Finally, another change made to the discussion was to clarify the ICU physicians' alleged low level of compliance with advice given by infectious disease specialists. This has been suggested in previous studies it cannot be substantiated when analyzing the results of the study. PURPOSE: Inappropriate use of antibiotics is an important health problem that is related to increasing bacterial resistance. Despite its relevance, many health institutions assign very limited resources to improving prescribing practices. An antimicrobial stewardship programme (APS) centred on patients discharged from the ICU could efficiently undertake this task. METHODS: During this six month study the main activity was performing a programmed review of antimicrobial prescriptions in patients transferred to the ward from the ICU. In the case of amendable antimicrobial treatment, a recommendation was included in the medical record. RESULTS: A total of 437 antimicrobial prescriptions for 286 patients were revised during a six month period and a total of 271 prescriptions (62%) in 183 patients were considered to be amendable. In most of these cases, treatment could have been reduced taking into consideration each patient's clinical improvement and their location in a hospital area with a lower risk of infection due to resistant bacteria. The most common advice was antimicrobial withdrawal (64%), antimicrobial change (20%) and switching to oral route (12%). Proposed recommendations were addressed in 212 cases (78%). There was no significant difference in adherence with respect to the type of recommendation (p=0.417). There was a 5% lower use of antibiotics during the year the study was conducted compared to the previous one. CONCLUSIONS: ASPs centred on patients discharged from the ICU may be an efficient strategy to ameliorate antimicrobial use in hospitals.

Antimicrobial stewardship in patients recently transferred to a ward from the ICU.

PURPOSE: Inappropriate use of antibiotics is an important health problem that is related to increasing bacterial resistance. Despite its relevance, many health institutions assign very limited resources to improving prescribing practices. An antimicrobial stewardship programme (APS) centred on patients discharged from the ICU could efficiently undertake this task. METHODS: During this six month study the main activity was performing a programmed review of antimicrobial prescriptions in patients transferred to the ward from the ICU. In the case of inadequate antimicrobial treatment, a recommendation was included in the medical record. RESULTS: A total of 437 antimicrobial prescriptions for 286 patients were revised during a six month period. In all, 271 prescriptions (62%) were considered inappropriate in 183 patients. The most common reasons for inappropriateness were treating unconfirmed infection (43%), inadequate antimicrobial coverage (34%) and intravenous administration when the oral route was feasible (11%). Proposed recommendations were addressed in 212 cases (78%). There was no significant difference in adherence with respect to the type of recommendation (p=0.417). There was a 5% lower use of antibiotics during the year the study was conducted compared to the previous one. CONCLUSIONS: ASPs centred on patients discharged from the ICU may be an efficient strategy to ameliorate antimicrobial use in hospitals.