Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) ; 45(9): 1067-1073, 2016 Nov.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27125379

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study is to evaluate the feasibility, safety and diagnostic value of hysterosonography performed in an emergency setting among patients consulting for active abnormal uterine bleeding. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, we included 216 patients visiting our emergency department for abnormal uterine bleeding. All patients had a transvaginal ultrasound with doppler study and an hysterosonography. Secondly, the patients, in whom we diagnosed a suspected organic lesion, were addressed to an endoscopic or surgical procedure with pathological examination. Initially, we evaluated the feasibility and the safety of hysterosonography and secondly, we compared the two techniques (EEV and hysterosonography), sensitivity, specificity, LHR+and LHR-. RESULTS: The hysterosonography was performed in 98.1 % of patients and its realization has resulted in an additional period of 1.2minutes on average (extreme: 6-12) compared to ultrasound. The tolerance of the hysterosonographic examination was very good in 73.5 % of patients and good in 23.1 % of them. For the 167 patients who had been diagnosed with presumed organic lesions, pathological examination found an endometrial hyperplasia in 34.7 % of cases, polyps in 40.1 % of cases, sub-mucosal fibroids in 11.3 % of cases, endometrial cancer in 0.7 % of cases and other lesions in 13.2 % of cases. The diagnostic value of hysterosonography was superior to ultrasound in the detection of polyps (AUC: 0.894 vs 0.778, P=0.003) and fibromas (AUC: 1.000 vs 0.716, P=0.001) while the two methods showed no significant difference in the detection of hyperplasia. CONCLUSION: The purpose of our study was to focus on a particular context of use of the hysterosonography consisting on hemorrhagic period and on its realization in the emergency room. We were able to demonstrate that hysterosonography is compatible with the emergency situation as to its feasibility and its diagnostic value and that its realization would contribute to the sorting of patients to guide them immediately to a surgical or endoscopic procedure if necessary.


Subject(s)
Hysteroscopy/methods , Ultrasonography, Doppler/methods , Uterine Hemorrhage/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Hysteroscopy/standards , Metrorrhagia/diagnostic imaging , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Ultrasonography, Doppler/standards
2.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil ; 42(6): 399-403, 2014 Jun.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24411339

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The assessment of fetal head engagement by digital examination is highly subjective even though this method remains the gold standard. Ultrasound could be a new way to specify the fetal head engagement with objective and reproductible measurements. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical data and the transperineal ultrasound results for the diagnosis of fetal head engagement. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective longitudinal study on a series of 70 patients and compared the clinical assessment of fetal engagement to the ultrasound measurements. Ultrasound examination was performed in the delivery room. The probe was placed on the ano-vulvar area. The measure used was: distance perineum-external table of fetal head bone. RESULTS: The ultrasound measures of the distance [perineum-external table of fetal head bone] went from 13 to 75 mm; and the measures of the distance [perineum-succedaneum bump] went from 22 to 68 mm. We tried to retain a value threshold of the distance [perineum-external table of fetal head bone] above which the diagnosis of engagement would be countered. The threshold so proposed is of 55 mm with a positive predictive value in 98%, a sensibility in 87% and specificity in 93%. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Transperineal ultrasound is a simple and easy method to define fetal head engagement by measuring the distance between perineum and fetal head. This new tool can be very useful in the delivery room when clinical examination is inconclusive hampered, for example, by the presence of a succedaneum bump.


Subject(s)
Head/diagnostic imaging , Head/embryology , Labor Presentation , Labor, Obstetric , Ultrasonography, Prenatal , Adult , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Palpation , Perineum/diagnostic imaging , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Tunisia
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...