Valvular involvement in ANCA-associated systemic vasculitis: a case report and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA)-associated systemic vasculitides have a variety of presentations, but cardiac valvular involvement is rarely diagnosed and its management is not established. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 44 year old man who presented with an ANCA-associated systemic vasculitis and aortic regurgitation of unusual mechanism. Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography disclosed septal hypertrophy preventing a complete closure of the aortic valve and thus responsible for a massive aortic regurgitation. After 4 months of immunosuppressive therapy, the valve lesion did not subside and the patient had to undergo aortic valve replacement. This report also reviews the 20 cases of systemic ANCA-associated vasculitis with endocardial valvular involvement previously reported in the English language medical literature. CONCLUSIONS: Valvular involvement in ANCA-associated systemic vasculitides is rarely reported. Most of these lesions are due to Wegener's granulomatosis and half are present when the diagnosis of vasculitis is made. The valvular lesion is usually isolated, aortic regurgitation being the most frequent type, and often requires valve replacement in the months that follow it's discovery.

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome: clinical and biologic disease patterns in 24 patients.

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS), also called drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), is a severe reaction usually characterized by fever, rash, and multiorgan failure, occurring 1-8 weeks after drug introduction. It is an immune-mediated reaction involving macrophage and T-lymphocyte activation and cytokine release, although no consensus has been reached as to its etiology. The skin, hematopoietic system, and liver are frequently involved. DIHS can mimic severe sepsis, viral infection, adult-onset Still disease (AOSD), or lymphoproliferation.We describe 24 consecutive patients with DIHS who were hospitalized between September 2004 and March 2008. Criteria for inclusion in this observational study were suspected drug reaction, eosinophilia >or=500/microL and/or atypical lymphocytes, involvement of at least 2 organs (skin being 1 of them), with suggestive chronology and exclusion of other diagnoses. Our cohort of 12 women and 12 men had a median age of 49 years (range, 22-82 yr), and 11 had skin phototype V or VI. Patients with mild or no rash were immunocompromised (7/24)- defined as treatment with prednisone (>or=10 mg/d) and another immunosuppressant drug, or human immunodeficiency virus infection. All patients were febrile (>38 degrees C), 14 had localized or generalized edema, 7 had pharyngitis, 8 had lymphadenopathy, 22 had hepatitis, 4 had nephritis, 2 had noninfectious and nonlithiasic angiocholitis or cholecystitis. Ten patients were hypotensive, 5 of whom had associated laboratory signs and/or imaging findings suggestive of acute myocardial dysfunction. Half of the patients had hemogram abnormalities, including eosinophilia. Nine DIHS patients fulfilled the Fautrel criteria for AOSD diagnosis, including glycosylated ferritin <20% in 4/11, with or without laboratory characteristics of hemophagocytosis. Twenty DIHS episodes occurred during the less sunny months of October to March.We determined 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25[OH]D3) levels in 18 patients and found that 9 patients had vitamin D deficiency (<25 nmol/L or <10 microg/L) and 5 had vitamin D insufficiency (25-50 nmol/L). Moreover, 25(OH)D3 levels were inversely correlated with ferritin values. After culprit-drug withdrawal, outcomes were favorable for all patients, including those with cardiac abnormalities under slow tapering of glucocorticoids.We recommend looking for the frequent but underdiagnosed hypersensitivity myocarditis with noninvasive diagnostic tools, such as N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide, and promptly withdrawing the culprit drug and starting glucocorticoids. Vitamin D deficiency might be a DIHS risk or severity factor, especially for patients with high skin phototype and during the winter. Because DIHS clinical and laboratory patterns share similarities with AOSD and hemophagocytosis, DIHS should be included in their differential diagnoses.

[Tuberculosis risk among patients with systemic diseases]. / Risque de tuberculose au cours des maladies systémiques.

The incidence of tuberculosis among patients with systemic rheumatic diseases is much higher than in the general population (the risk is multiplied by 5 to 15 in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus). Reactivation of a latent tuberculosis is frequent, as assessed by the short delay of occurrence after a systemic rheumatic disease has been diagnosed. Besides immunosuppression induced by the underlying disease, the role of glucocorticoids and of immunosuppressive therapy including biotherapies using TNF antagonists must be underlined. Tuberculosis in such patients frequently presents as extrapulmonary or disseminated disease. A screening of tuberculosis is recommended before anti-TNF therapy, and includes previous history questioning, chest X ray, tuberculin skin test with 5 international units of tuberculin. Immunological methods of tuberculosis detection are under evaluation in these patients. If a latent tuberculosis infection is diagnosed, a specific tuberculosis chemoprophylaxis, started at least 3 weeks before initiation of TNF antagonists, has allowed to reduce the occurrence of anti-TNF-associated tuberculosis in patients living in Europe and North America. The screening strategies for tuberculosis should probably be extended in all patients with systemic rheumatic diseases receiving glucocorticoids and/or immunosuppressive therapy.

Acute pancreatitis related to tigecycline: case report and review of the literature.

Tigecycline is a new broad-spectrum antibiotic. Nausea and vomiting are its most common side-effects. We describe here a case of severe acute pancreatitis related to tigecycline in order to highlight the possible occurrence of this adverse event and to remind clinicians to measure the lipase rate if in any doubt.