ABSTRACT
The objective of the study was to compare the outcome measures of patients with endometrial adenocarcinoma diagnosed by endometrial biopsy, uterine curettage, or hysteroscopy. Medical records of 392 women diagnosed with apparent early-stage endometrial adenocarcinoma were reviewed. Data concerning the mode of diagnosis, histologic type and grade, surgical stage, peritoneal washings and lymph nodes status, and patient's outcome were retrieved. During the study period, 99 (25.3%) cases were diagnosed by endometrial biopsy, 193 (49.2%) by uterine curettage, and 100 (25.5%) by hysteroscopy. There were 347 (88.5%) cases of endometrioid adenocarcinoma and 45 (11.5%) of poor histologic types, including serous papillary, clear cell, and small cell cancer. Three hundred and sixteen (80.6%) patients had stage I disease, 8 (2.0%) stage II, and 68 (17.4%) stage III. Peritoneal cytology was positive in only one case. Recurrent disease occurred in 6.9% patients, of which 50% had local recurrence and 50% had distant. Recurrent disease was found in 15.2% patients diagnosed by endometrial biopsy, in 4.7% where uterine curettage was used, and in 5% when hysteroscopy was applied. No statistically significant difference in the survival rate between the different diagnostic methods applied was found, although a higher recurrence rate was noted following endometrial biopsy. After a median follow-up time of 25 months for patients undergoing hysteroscopy, there was no difference in recurrence rates and/or overall survival compared to other diagnostic procedures implying that hysteroscopy can be safely used in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Endometrial Neoplasms/diagnosis , Endometrial Neoplasms/surgery , Hysteroscopy , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Aged , Endometrial Neoplasms/mortality , Endometrial Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Hysteroscopy/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Survival AnalysisABSTRACT
Two cases of septic complications of routine second trimester amniocentesis are presented. The first case is a 37-year-old gravida suffering from ulcerative colitis who was admitted for amniocentesis in the 18th week of her third pregnancy. An uncomplicated transabdominal amniocentesis was performed using a sterile technique and ultrasound guidance. Twenty-eight hours later the patient had a septic abortion and sepsis. The second case is a 34-year-old gravida in the 24th week of her pregnancy who was admitted with amnionitis 10 h after an uncomplicated amniocentesis, and subsequently had a septic abortion. A high index of suspicion and rapid intervention were crucial in both cases.
