A single-centre report of acute pyelonephritis in a patient after kidney transplantation - analyses of risk factors.

BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infections (UTI) are the most common infectious complications after kidney transplantation (KTx) with highest incidence in the first three months of transplantation. UTI in transplant recipients increase morbidity and mortality, risk of graft failure and incidence of acute rejection episodes. According to published data, urinary tract infections significantly affect graft survival. The aim of our study was to identify possible risk factors for the development of UTI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of patients who received kidney transplantation between January 2014 and December 2016 in the Transplant Center of Louis Pasteur University Hospital in Kosice. One hundred and fifty-three patients after kidney transplantation were included in the study. RESULTS: A total of 47 Caucasian patients (30%) developed UTI, namely - acute pyelonephritis after KTx. We identified independent risk factors associated with UTI such as female gender OR (7.98, 95% CI 2.88-22.12, p < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (OR 5.26, 95% CI 2.01-13.74, p = 0.001; 95% CI 4.57-53.82, p < 0.001) urologic complication (OR 15.68, 95% CI 4.57-53.82; p < 0.001) and acute rejection episode (OR 3.15, 95% CI 1.13-8.76, p = 0.027). The most common microbiological agent was Escherichia coli. CONCLUSION: We identified the aforementioned risk factors of urinary tract infections in the files of our patients. Statistically, the most significant risk factors are the female gender, and presence of urological complications. The urological complications and BMI of the patients are considered modifiable factors. Based on our analysis, we confirmed a significantly higher number of ACR patients who overcame infection which is in accordance with the published data on association of UTI with the development of acute cellular rejection (ACR) (Tab. 2, Fig. 1, Ref. 15).

The impact of different induction immunosuppression protocols on patient survival, graft survival and acute graft rejection after kidney transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to stratify the immunological risk based on the presence of risk factors using different induction immunosuppressive protocols. BACKGROUND: The path to successful kidney transplantation reflects the accuracy of immunological risk assessment and choice of correct induction and maintenance of immunosuppression to avoid acute kidney rejection. METHODS: We performed a multicentre prospective analysis consisting of patients after kidney transplantation with a 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: In total, 152 kidney transplant recipients were included, of whom 100 were males (66.4 %). We divided patients according to the induction immunosuppression as follows: no induction (n = 19), induction with basiliximab (n = 60), and induction with ATG at cumulative doses of 3.5 mg/kg (n = 42) and 6 mg/kg (n = 31). In our study, we demonstrated a shorter survival of patients without induction immunosuppression. In the basiliximab group, the duration of dialysis ≥ 3 years (p = 0.0191), cold ischaemia time ≥ 1,020 minutes or expected delayed graft function (p < 0.0001) are independent risk factors for graft loss (p = 0.0097). CONCLUSIONS: Risk of no induction immunosuppression significantly exceeds the risks associated with its administration and is desirable even in patients at low immunological risk. Induction immunosuppression should be tailored individually and thus differ from patient to patient (Tab. 6, Fig. 1, Ref. 15).

How COVID-19 crisis influenced kidney transplant recipients in Slovakia.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of our analysis was to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the procurement program and kidney transplantation in Slovakia and to identify the risk factors for a severe course of COVID-19 disease, as well as the risk factors for COVID-19 fatalities, with the focus on the parameters preceding the infection. We compared morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 before and after the spread of the alpha variant of the virus and the same among transplant (KTRs) and haemodialysis patients in Slovakia. METHODS: 305 KTRs (68.8 % males) with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 positivity were included in the multicentric retrospective analysis. The patients were split into subgroups based on the time of falling ill and their clinical course. RESULTS: The procurement program and kidney transplants in Slovakia dropped in the observed period by 28.6 % (p<0.0001) and by 33.5 % (p<0.0001) respectively. Age over 59 years (p=0.0088) and diabetes mellitus (p=0.0106) were identified as independent risk factors for severe course of the disease. Risk factors for death were the age over 59 years (p=0.0003) and graft dysfunction with CKD-EPI<0.5 mL/s (p=0.0029). The prevalence of the alpha variant in Slovakia was associated with a severe course in KTRs treated with corticoids (p=0.0273) and in graft dysfunction with CKD-EPI<0.5 mL/s (p=0.0076); the risk of death was higher in KTRs over 59 years (p=0.0173) and again with CKD-EPI<0.5 mL/s (p=0.0393). KTRs had a 3.7 times lower risk of infection compared to the haemodialysis patients (p<0.0001), with mortality of 9.8 % vs 30 % (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: The procurement and transplant program is sustainable even during a pandemic, provided that measures are set up quickly. Morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 in KTRs was comparable to the situation in EU countries. Patients in the haemodialysis program had a worse prognosis (Tab. 5, Fig. 1, Ref. 21) Keywords: COVID-19, kidney transplantation, dialysis, immunosuppression, obesity, diabetes mellitus.

The DESCARTES-Nantes survey of kidney transplant recipients displaying clinical operational tolerance identifies 35 new tolerant patients and 34 almost tolerant patients.

BACKGROUND: Kidney recipients maintaining a prolonged allograft survival in the absence of immunosuppressive drugs and without evidence of rejection are supposed to be exceptional. The ERA-EDTA-DESCARTES working group together with Nantes University launched a European-wide survey to identify new patients, describe them and estimate their frequency for the first time. METHODS: Seventeen coordinators distributed a questionnaire in 256 transplant centres and 28 countries in order to report as many 'operationally tolerant' patients (TOL; defined as having a serum creatinine <1.7 mg/dL and proteinuria <1 g/day or g/g creatinine despite at least 1 year without any immunosuppressive drug) and 'almost tolerant' patients (minimally immunosuppressed patients (MIS) receiving low-dose steroids) as possible. We reported their number and the total number of kidney transplants performed at each centre to calculate their frequency. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-seven questionnaires were returned and we identified 66 TOL (61 with complete data) and 34 MIS patients. Of the 61 TOL patients, 26 were previously described by the Nantes group and 35 new patients are presented here. Most of them were noncompliant patients. At data collection, 31/35 patients were alive and 22/31 still operationally tolerant. For the remaining 9/31, 2 were restarted on immunosuppressive drugs and 7 had rising creatinine of whom 3 resumed dialysis. Considering all patients, 10-year death-censored graft survival post-immunosuppression weaning reached 85% in TOL patients and 100% in MIS patients. With 218 913 kidney recipients surveyed, cumulative incidences of operational tolerance and almost tolerance were estimated at 3 and 1.5 per 10 000 kidney recipients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In kidney transplantation, operational tolerance and almost tolerance are infrequent findings associated with excellent long-term death-censored graft survival.