Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
SA J Radiol ; 26(1): 2495, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36262829

ABSTRACT

Background: Occupational exposure to ionising radiation may have detrimental health effects. Longer and more complex fluoroscopic procedures have placed interventionalists at increased occupational health risks especially for developing cataracts in the radiosensitive lenses of the eyes. Objectives: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of occupational related cataracts and describe the risk factors for cataracts in occupationally exposed interventionalists compared with unexposed doctors. Method: A cross-sectional study using multiple methods. A survey was conducted. The radiation workload was determined based on a self-administered questionnaire and dose area product values determined in previous studies. Both groups had slit lamp examinations. The data were analysed analytically using R software version 9.3. Results: The study included 98 interventionalists. The combined prevalence of posterior sub-capsular (PSC) and cortical cataracts was 18.8% in the exposed and 13.9% in the unexposed group. The prevalence of PSC cataracts in the exposed group was 5.9% and 2.8% in the unexposed group, with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58; 8.61). Posterior sub-capsular cataracts were more common in the left eye. The increase in cataracts was not statistically significant in the exposed group but is of clinical significance. Conclusion: The findings are important as they highlight the need for greater vigilance for protecting the radiation healthcare workforce in a developing country setting. Contribution: The research is the first of its kind in South Africa and Africa and contributes to determining the prevalence in this highly skilled and occupationally vulnerable group.

2.
Int J Radiat Biol ; 98(1): 50-59, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34705615

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Even though X-ray beams are widely used in medical diagnosis or radiotherapy, the comparisons of their dose rates are scarce. We have recently demonstrated in vitro (clonogenic assay, cell viability, cell cycle, senescence) and in vivo (weight follow-up of animals and bordering epithelium staining of lesion), that for a single dose of irradiation, the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) deviates from 1 (up to twofold greater severe damage at the highest dose rate depending on the assay) when increasing the dose rate of high energy X-ray beams. MATERIAL AND METHODS: To further investigate the impact of the dose rate on RBE, in this study, we performed in vitro fractionated irradiations by using the same two dose rates (0.63 and 2.5 Gy.min-1) of high-energy X-rays (both at 4 MV) on normal endothelial cells (HUVECs). We investigated the viability/mortality, characterized radiation-induced senescence by using flow cytometry and measured gene analysis deregulations on custom arrays. RESULTS: The overall results enlighten that, in fractionated irradiations when varying the dose rate of high-energy X-rays, the RBE of photons deviates from 1 (up to 2.86 for viability/mortality experiments performed 21 days postirradiation). CONCLUSION: These results strengthen the interest of multiparametric analysis approaches in providing an accurate evaluation of the outcomes of irradiated cells in support of clonogenic assays, especially when such assays are not feasible.


Subject(s)
Endothelial Cells , Animals , Cell Survival/radiation effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Relative Biological Effectiveness , X-Rays
3.
Sci Rep ; 9(1): 14328, 2019 10 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31586152

ABSTRACT

Based on classic clonogenic assay, it is accepted by the scientific community that, whatever the energy, the relative biological effectiveness of X-rays is equal to 1. However, although X-ray beams are widely used in diagnosis, interventional medicine and radiotherapy, comparisons of their energies are scarce. We therefore assessed in vitro the effects of low- and high-energy X-rays using Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) by performing clonogenic assay, measuring viability/mortality, counting γ-H2AX foci, studying cell proliferation and cellular senescence by flow cytometry and by performing gene analysis on custom arrays. Taken together, excepted for γ-H2AX foci counts, these experiments systematically show more adverse effects of high energy X-rays, while the relative biological effectiveness of photons is around 1, whatever the quality of the X-ray beam. These results strongly suggest that multiparametric analysis should be considered in support of clonogenic assay.


Subject(s)
Histones/radiation effects , Photons/adverse effects , Relative Biological Effectiveness , X-Rays/adverse effects , Cell Survival/radiation effects , Colony-Forming Units Assay , DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded/radiation effects , Genetic Markers/radiation effects , Histones/genetics , Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells , Humans , Linear Energy Transfer , Proof of Concept Study
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...