New Hyperacusis Therapy Combines Psychoeducation, Sound Exposure, and Counseling.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the short- and long-term effects of a new cognitive sound exposure therapy (CSET) in patients with hyperacusis. METHOD: A new therapy was developed to reduce hyperacusis using sound exposure combined with breathing and relaxation strategies from both acceptance and commitment therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy. Patients who were referred to the Speech and Hearing Centers located in Hengelo and Zwolle in the Netherlands and aged ≥ 18 years with hyperacusis as main complaint and no or mild hearing loss were included in this study. Patients were seen for CSET between June 2020 and August 2022. The sessions took place biweekly. Sessions ended when exposure reached a level with a maximum of 70-80 dB SPL. Short-term effects between the start and the end of therapy were based on tolerable level of sound exposure (dB SPL), subjective-level hinderance of hyperacusis, and sensitivity to sound using the Hyperacusis Questionnaire (HQ). The long-term effect was based on HQ 6 months after the end of therapy. Linear mixed-effects and regression models were applied to study outcomes over time. RESULTS: In total, 30 patients, 15 men and 15 women, aged between 24 and 76 years were included in this study. The mean number of sessions during therapy was 6 and ranged between 4 and 8. Results showed an increase of exposure level (mean change was +23.7 dB with an SD of 7.9, p < .001), a decrease in sensitivity to daily sounds (mean [SD] change was -1.6 [2.1], p < .001), and a decrease in HQ (mean [SD] change was -9.8 [4.9], p < .001), between the start and the end of therapy. There was no significant change in HQ after the end of therapy and 6 months later; mean (SD) change was 0.2 (4.3), p = .81. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of CSET indicated a decrease in short- and long-term sensitivity to sound in patients with hyperacusis. Additionally, CSET has shown a positive impact, not only for the sounds used in the therapy sessions but also in transferring benefits to everyday sounds. The results of combining psychoeducation, sound exposure, and counseling are promising and warrant further evaluation.

An eight-year follow-up on auditory outcomes after neonatal hearing screening.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to assess the neonatal click Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) results in relation to the subsequently determined mean hearing loss (HL) over 1, 2 and 4 kHz, as well as over 2 and 4 kHz. METHODS: Between 2004-2009, follow-up data were collected from Visual Reinforcement Audiometry (VRA) at 1 and 2 years and playaudiometry at 4 and 8 years of newborns who had failed neonatal hearing screening in the well-baby clinics and who had been referred to a single Speech and Hearing center. Hearing Level data were compared with ABR threshold-levels established during the first months of life. The Two One-Sided Tests equivalence procedure for paired means was applied, using a region of similarity equal to 10 dB. RESULTS: Initially, in 135 out of 172 children referred for diagnostic procedures hearing loss was confirmed in the neonatal period. In 106/135 of the HL children the eight-year follow-up was completed. Permanent conductive HL was established in 5/106 cases; the hearing thresholds were predominantly stable over time. Temporary conductive HL was found in 48/106 cases and the loss disappeared by 4 years of age at the latest. Sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) was found in 53/106 cases, of which 13 were unilateral and 40 bilateral. ABR levels were equivalent (within a 10 dB range) to VRA levels at age 1 and 2 and play audiometry levels at age 4 and 8, both when VRA and play audiometry were averaged over both frequency ranges. CONCLUSION: Long term follow-up data of children with SNHL suggest that the initial click ABR level established in the first months of life, are equivalent to the hearing threshold measured at the age of 1, 2, 4 and 8 years for both mean frequency ranges. Click ABR can reliably be used as starting point for long-term hearing rehabilitation.

The effect of visual cues on top-down restoration of temporally interrupted speech, with and without further degradations.

In complex listening situations, cognitive restoration mechanisms are commonly used to enhance perception of degraded speech with inaudible segments. Profoundly hearing-impaired people with a cochlear implant (CI) show less benefit from such mechanisms. However, both normal hearing (NH) listeners and CI users do benefit from visual speech cues in these listening situations. In this study we investigated if an accompanying video of the speaker can enhance the intelligibility of interrupted sentences and the phonemic restoration benefit, measured by an increase in intelligibility when the silent intervals are filled with noise. Similar to previous studies, restoration benefit was observed with interrupted speech without spectral degradations (Experiment 1), but was absent in acoustic simulations of CIs (Experiment 2) and was present again in simulations of electric-acoustic stimulation (Experiment 3). In all experiments, the additional speech information provided by the complementary visual cues lead to overall higher intelligibility, however, these cues did not influence the occurrence or extent of the phonemic restoration benefit of filler noise. Results imply that visual cues do not show a synergistic effect with the filler noise, as adding them equally increased the intelligibility of interrupted sentences with or without the filler noise.