Pseudoquiste gigante de pared abdominal: una complicación infrecuente de la eventroplastia con malla de sustitución / Giant abdominal pseudocyst: A rare complication of incisional hernia repair with mesh

No disponible

Total extraperitoneal (TEP) hernioplasty with intestinal resection assisted by laparoscopy for a strangulated Richter femoral hernia.

We describe the first clinical case of a total extraperitoneal hernioplasty combined with intestinal resection assisted by laparoscopy for a strangulated Richter femoral hernia. The patient was a 94-year-old woman admitted to the emergency room with signs and symptoms of acute small bowel obstruction. Diagnosis of a strangulated left Richter femoral hernia was only possible during the initial exploratory laparoscopy. The extraperitoneal approach for mesh positioning was performed gaining access through an infraumbilical 12 mm trocar incision, and assistance of two 5 mm laparoscopic ports at the hipogastrium and right flank. Laparoscopy was resumed and segmental intestinal resection with primary anastomosis was performed. The patient recovered without complications and was discharged home at the fourth postoperative day. The total extraperitoneal approach for acute hernia repair was successful in our particular case. However, factors such as laparoscopic surgical experience, careful patient selection, and correct preoperative diagnosis must be considered before studies in the emergency setting.

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy for day surgery procedure: are we prepared?

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for cholecystectomy is a well-established procedure and represents the next step in developing the concept of fast track surgery. This report describes our experience with SILS cholecystectomy in patients that stay overnight. Between February 2009 and July 2010, patients referred for cholecystectomy to the day surgery unit who agreed to undergo SILS were included in a prospective study. All operations were performed by the same surgical team specially trained in this type of surgery and the same operative technique was used in all cases. Postoperative pain and nausea were assessed using a 10-cm visual analogue scale on a self-completion questionnaire on the night of operation and the morning of discharge. A total of 107 patients (58% women, mean age 56 years) with symptomatic gallstones were included in the study. SILS was successfully performed in all patients and no patient required conversion to an open procedure. There were no significant differences in the median visual analogue scale for postoperative pain and nausea between the night of surgery and the next morning. The mean length of hospital stay was 23 hours, and 98 per cent of patients were satisfied with the results of surgery and would be willing to undergo the same procedure again. SILS cholecystectomy is a valid alternative to standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy as an outpatient surgery or overnight stay procedure. According to these promising results, SILS cholecystectomy could be included in a major ambulatory surgery program.

Single-incision versus standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy: comparison of surgical outcomes from a single institution.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy via the three-trocar technique is widely used for symptomatic gallbladder stones. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for cholecystectomy is a well-established procedure and represents the next step in developing the concept of mini-invasive surgery. We here described our 24-month experience SILS cholecystectomy. METHODS: Between February 2009 and 2011, patients referred for cholecystectomy to the General and Endocrine Unit of our institution who agreed to undergo SILS were included in a prospective study. All operations were performed by the same surgical team specially trained in this type of surgery. The umbilicus was the sole point of entry for all patients. The same operative technique was used in all patients. Data of patients undergoing SILS cholecystectomy were compared with those from an uncontrolled group of patients undergoing standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy during the same study period. RESULTS: The SILS and standard cholecystectomy groups included 120 patients each. SILS was performed in all patients and none of them required conversion to an open procedure. The median operating time of 45 minutes in the SILS group was not significantly different from that in the standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy group. We suture fascial edge with simple stitches under direct vision, thus reducing the risk of incisional hernia in SILS group (P=.046). CONCLUSIONS: SILS cholecystectomy was technically feasible and safe and represents a reproducible alternative to standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy in selected patients. The definitive clinical, esthetic, and functional advantages of this technique require further analysis.

Suprapubic single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy: a nonvisible-scar surgical option.

BACKGROUND: At the present time, and given the increasing concern about body image, laparoscopic surgeons are faced with an increasing number of patients who want to conserve the umbilicus free of scars for cosmetic reasons. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) using the suprapubic approach for appendectomy, while keeping the advantages of SILS through an umbilical incision, leaves the visible abdomen without scars. Moreover, insertion of an additional port in patients with retrocecal or purulent or gangrenous acute appendicitis requiring intra-abdominal drainage is avoided. This report describes the initial experience with suprapubic SILS appendectomy. METHODS: Between September 2009 and December 2010, patients with acute appendicitis admitted to the General Surgery and Emergency Unit of the authors' institution and who agreed to undergo SILS appendectomy through the suprapubic approach were included in a prospective study. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and surgical outcome were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients (12 men and 8 women) with a mean age of 30 ± 3 years underwent suprapubic SILS appendectomy. The mean duration of the operation was 40 ± 7 min. Placement of a suction drain was necessary in four patients. The mean length of hospital stay was 2 ± 0.5 days. The operation was completed successfully in all patients, and conversion to either multiport or open surgery was not required. No intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred. In all patients, the appearance of the suprapubic wound was good at 7 days after surgery. CONCLUSION: Suprapubic SILS appendectomy offers better, cosmetically appealing results than the standard umbilical access. In case of retrocecal or purulent or gangrenous acute appendicitis, the view provided via the suprapubic approach makes access to and dissection of the appendix easy, and it also enables exteriorization of a drain without adding new lateral incisions.

Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery appendectomy.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic appendectomy via the three-trocar technique is widely used for appendectomy. This report describes the initial experience with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) appendectomy. METHODS: Between December 2008 and March 2009, patients with acute appendicitis admitted to the General Surgery and Emergency Unit of the authors' institution who agreed to undergo LESS appendectomy were included in a prospective study. All operations were performed by the same surgical team specially trained in this type of emergency surgery. The umbilicus was the sole point of entry for all patients, and the same operative technique was used in all cases. The data for patients undergoing LESS appendectomy were compared with the data from an uncontrolled group of patients undergoing standard laparoscopic appendectomy during the same study period. RESULTS: The LESS and standard appendectomy groups included 15 patients each. The LESS procedure was performed successfully for all the patients, and none required conversion to an open procedure or a conventional laparoscopic appendectomy by the addition of more entry ports. The mean operating time of 51 min in the LESS group was not significantly different from the 46 min in the standard laparoscopic appendectomy group. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, LESS appendectomy was technically feasible and safe, representing a reproducible alternative to standard laparoscopic appendectomy.

Laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy: a safe and reproducible alternative.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy via the three-trocar technique is widely used for symptomatic gallbladder stones. In this article, we describe the initial experience with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) cholecystectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between February and April 2009, patients referred for cholecystectomy to the General Surgery Unit of our institution who agreed to undergo LESS were included in a prospective study. All operations were performed by the same surgical team that was specially trained in this type of surgery. The umbilicus was the sole point of entry for all patients. The same operative technique was used in all patients. Data of patients undergoing LESS cholecystectomy were compared with those from an uncontrolled group of patients undergoing standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy during the same study period. RESULTS: The LESS and standard cholecystectomy groups included 19 patients each. LESS was successfully performed in all patients and none required conversion to an open procedure or a conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy by adding more entry ports. The median operating time of 62 minutes in the LESS group was not significantly different than that in the standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy group. CONCLUSIONS: LESS cholecystectomy was technically feasible, safe, and represents a reproducible alternative to standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

[Factors associated with patient satisfaction and care of over 65 year olds in emergency departments]. / Factores asociados con la satisfacción en el cuidado y la asistencia en el departamento de cirugía de urgencias de los pacientes mayores de 65 años.

INTRODUCTION: The population over 65 years old represents 40-50% of the all visits made to an emergency department (ED). Some situations of stress and dehumanization can occur due to user overflow. Our target is to identify factors influencing overall satisfaction of patients older than 65 attended in the ED, in order to identify points of conflict and improve the deficiencies in our care. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We performed a prospective study from September 2005-June 2006 with those patients who accepted to take part by filling an anonymous and confidential questionnaire. We evaluated 19 epidemiological variables, medical and related to the quality of information provided. A single bivariate analysis was performed (chi2, t-Student or logistic regression). RESULTS: The questionnaire was filled out by 1389 (31.3%) out of 4437 patients that could potentially be included in the study. Mean patient age was 77 +/- 6 years and more than half of them were women (64%). Of the responses, 82% rated their ED care as excellent or good. Variables significantly related to satisfaction were perception of a not-too-long waiting time (p = 0.001), having been attended to previously in the hospital (p = 0.050), having explained the tests that patients had to undergo (p = 0.002) and having been given clear information from staff (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In order to improve the quality of care given in the ED, the staff should give more personalized and clear information and reduce the patient perception that waiting time is too long.

Factores asociados con la satisfacción en el cuidado y la asistencia en el departamento de cirugía de urgencias de los pacientes mayores de 65 años / Factors associated with patient satisfaction and care of over 65 year olds in emergency departments

Introducción. La población de 65 años o más es el 40-50% de las visitas de un departamento de urgencias (DU). Dada la afluencia de algunas veces, se producen situaciones de tensión e incluso de deshumanización en la asistencia. El objetivo de nuestro trabajo es mostrar y analizar los factores que influyen en la satisfacción global de los pacientes mayores de 65 años, atendidos en el DU, para poder identificar puntos potencialmente conflictivos y resolver las carencias de nuestra asistencia diaria. Material y método. Realizamos un estudio prospectivo entre septiembre de 2005 y junio de 2006, con los pacientes que aceptaron participar y que rellenaron un cuestionario anónimo y confidencial. Evaluamos 19 variables epidemiológicas, médicas y relacionadas con la calidad de la información recibida; se realizó un análisis bivariante (x2, t de Student) para seleccionar las variables relacionadas con un mayor grado de satisfacción en nuestra serie. Resultados. Cumplimentaron el cuestionario 1.389 (31,3%) de 4.437 pacientes que podían ser incluidos. La media de edad de los pacientes fue 77 ± 6 años. Más de la mitad eran mujeres (64%). El 82% de los pacientes puntuaron la asistencia global recibida en urgencias como excelente o buena. Las variables relacionadas significativamente con un alto grado de satisfacción global fueron la percepción de un tiempo de espera no demasiado largo (p = 0,001), haber sido atendido con anterioridad (p = 0,050), haber recibido una información adecuada por parte del personal médico (haber explicado las razones para solicitar pruebas complementarias [p = 0,002] y comunicar el resultado de estas exploraciones [p = 0,001]). Conclusiones. Para mejorar la calidad de la asistencia en el DU debemos aportar una información más personalizada y concisa, así como reducir la percepción del paciente de que el tiempo de espera es demasiado largo (AU)

Introduction. The population over 65 years old represents 40-50% of the all visits made to an emergency department (ED). Some situations of stress and dehumanization can occur due to user overflow. Our target is to identify factors influencing overall satisfaction of patients older than 65 attended in the ED, in order to identify points of conflict and improve the deficiencies in our care. Material and method. We performed a prospective study from September 2005-June 2006 with those patients who accepted to take part by filling an anonymous and confidential questionnaire. We evaluated 19 epidemiological variables, medical and related to the quality of information provided. A single bivariate analysis was performed (x2, t-Student or logistic regression). Results. The questionnaire was filled out by 1389 (31.3%) out of 4437 patients that could potentially be included in the study. Mean patient age was 77 ± 6 years and more than half of them were women (64%). Of the responses, 82% rated their ED care as “excellent” or “good”. Variables significantly related to satisfaction were perception of a not-too-long waiting time (p = 0.001), having been attended to previously in the hospital (p = 0.050), having explained the tests that patients had to undergo (p = 0.002) and having been given clear information from staff (p = 0.001). Conclusions. In order to improve the quality of care given in the ED, the staff should give more personalized and clear information and reduce the patient perception that waiting time is too long (AU)

Carrera profesional del personal médico. Un sistema incentivador útil cuando se mantienen sus principios de aplicación / Medical personnel’s careers. A useful incentive system as long as we adhere to its application principles

No disponible

Complicaciones vasculares asociadas a la pancreatitis / Vascular complications associated with pancreatitis

No disponible