ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To describe the development and implementation of a comprehensive in situ simulation-based curriculum for anesthesia residents. DESIGN: This is a prospective study. SETTING: This study was conducted at a university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: This single-center prospective study included all 53 anesthesia residents enrolled in the anesthesia residency program. INTERVENTIONS: Introduction of a routine, high-fidelity, in situ simulation program that incorporates short sessions to train residents in the necessary skill sets and decision-making processes required in the operating room. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Our team conducted 182 individual 15-minute simulation sessions over 3 months during regular working hours. All 53 residents in our program actively participated in the simulations. Most residents engaged in at least 3 sessions, with an average participation rate of 3.4 per resident (range, 1-6 sessions). Residents completed an online anonymous survey, with a response rate of 71.7% (38 of 53 residents) over the 3-month period. The survey aimed to assess their overall impression and perceived contribution of this project to their training. CONCLUSIONS: Our proposed teaching method can bridge the gap in resident training and enhance their critical reasoning to manage diverse clinical situations they may not experience during their residency.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to review and appraise the evidence regarding airway ultrasound assessment in predicting difficult laryngoscopy in adult patients. DESIGN: A systematic review of the literature was conducted according to the Cochrane collaboration guidelines and the recommendations for the systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic studies. Observational studies that evaluated the diagnostic performance of airway ultrasound for the prediction of difficult laryngoscopy were included for consideration. SETTING: Literature searches were performed in 4 databases (PubMed [Medline], Embase, Clinical Trials, and Google Scholar) to identify all observational studies using any ultrasound technique to assess difficult laryngoscopy. The search terms included "sonography," "ultrasound," "airway," "difficult airway," "difficult laryngoscopy," "Cormack," "risk factors," "ultrasound at the point of care," "difficult ventilation," "difficult intubation" and others, combined with sensitive filters. The search was done for studies performed in the last 20 years in English or Spanish. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients older than 18 years old under general anesthesia for an elective procedure. Evident anatomic airway abnormalities, obstetric populations, those using an alternative imaging method besides ultrasound, and animal studies were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: Preoperative bedside ultrasound measuring distances and ratios from the skin to different reference points, such as the ratio of the hyomental distance in a neutral position (HMDN) and hyomental distance in extension (HMDR), HMDN, and the skin-to-epiglottis distance (SED), the preepiglottic area, and tongue thickness, among others. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 24 studies evaluated the prediction of a difficult laryngoscopy using airway ultrasound. The diagnostic performance and the number of ultrasound parameters reported in the studies were variable. Meta-analysis was performed for 3 measurements consistently included in most studies. The SED and the HMDR ratio presented a sensitivity of 75% and 61%, respectively, and a specificity of 86% and 88%, respectively. The ratio of the preepiglottic distance to the epiglottic distance at the midpoint of the vocal cords (pre-E/E-VC) presented the best performance for predicting a difficult laryngoscopy (sensitivity: 82%, specificity: 83%, diagnostic odds ratio: 22.2). CONCLUSION: With the currently available evidence, the 3 commonly used point-of-care ultrasound measures used to identify difficult laryngoscopy, (SED, HMDR, and pre-E/E-VC), showed better sensitivity and similar specificity to clinical measures. Future studies and more data may change the authors' confidence in these conclusions, given the wide variability of measurements noted in studies.
Subject(s)
Intubation, Intratracheal , Laryngoscopy , Laryngoscopy/methods , Intubation, Intratracheal/methods , Ultrasonography/methodsABSTRACT
Resumen Introducción: para valorar la robustez de los resultados se ha propuesto una herramienta llamada el Índice de Fragilidad (IF), esta se define como el mínimo número de pacientes que se tienen que cambiar de "No eventos" a "Eventos" en el grupo de intervención para que un resultado estadísticamente significativo pase a no significativo, evidenciando que entre menor sea el IF, los resultados serán más frágiles. Diferentes autores han encontrado que la significancia de los resultados de muchos Ensayos Clínicos Controlados (ECA) dependen de pocos eventos. El objetivo del estudio fue evaluar el IF de los ECA en diabetes mellitus de cinco de las revistas médicas de mayor impacto a nivel mundial. Metodología: se realizó búsqueda electrónica en PubMed, para identificar ECA en Annals of Internal Medicine, BMJ, The Lancet, The New England Journal of Medicine y JAMA. Se revisaron los ECA en pacientes con diabetes mellitus o prediabetes y se calculó el IF para cada desenlace según el método descrito por Walsh et al, usando tablas de contingencia 2x2. Se planeó usar el coeficiente de correlación de Spearman para evaluar la correlación entre el IF y el tamaño de la muestra, el número de eventos, el valor de p y el tiempo de seguimiento. Se evaluó la significancia de todos los resultados con un valor de p<0,05. Resultados: la mediana del IF fue 11, y en tres estudios (7,3%) se encontró que el resultado no era estadísticamente significativo después de recalcular la p con el test exacto de Fisher. Se encontró relación directa leve entre el número de eventos y el IF (Rho= 0,343, p= 0,02) y correlación moderada inversa entre el valor de p y el IF (Rho= -0,632, p= 0,000). No se encontró correlación estadísticamente significativa entre el tamaño de muestra, tiempo de seguimiento y pérdidas con el IF. Conclusiones: en los ECA sobre diabetes, los resultados estadísticamente significativos dependen de pocos eventos, evidenciado por un bajo valor en el IF, los valores de esta medición están relacionados de forma directa con el número de eventos, e inversa con el valor de p.
Abstract Introduction: to evaluate the robustness of the results, a tool called the Fragility Index (FI) has been proposed, which is defined as the minimum number of patients that have to be changed from "No events" to "Events" in the intervention group to change a statistically significant to nonsignificant result. Showing that among a lower Fragility Index, the results of the trial will be less robust or more fragile. Different authors have found that the significance of the results of many controlled clinical trials (RCTs) depend on very few events. The objective of the study is to evaluate the FI of controlled clinical trials in diabetes mellitus in five of the general medical journals with the greatest impact factor worldwide. Methods: an electronic search was conducted in PubMed to identify randomized clinical trials in The Annals of Internal Medicine, BMJ, The Lancet, The New England Journal of Medicine and JAMA. Clinical trials were reviewed with diabetic or prediabetic patients and the FI was then calculated for each outcome according to the method described by Walsh et al, using 2x2 contingency tables. A priori was planned to use the Spearman correlation coefficient to evaluate the direct correlation between the Fragility Index and sample size, number of events, p-value and follow-up time. The significance of all the results was evaluated with a value of p <0.05. Results: the median Fragility Index was 11, and in three studies (7.3%) the result were not statistically significant after recalculating the p value with Fisher's exact test. A slight direct relationship between the number of events and the Fragility Index (Rho = 0.343, p = 0.02) was found and a moderate inverse correlation was observed between the p value and the FI (Rho = -0.632, p = 0.000 ). No statistically significant correlation was found between sample size, follow-up time and losses with the FI. Conclusions: in controlled clinical trials on diabetes, we found that the statistically significant results depend on a few events, evidenced by a low value in the Fragility Index. The values of this measurement are related to the number of events and negatively to the p value.
