Rituximab as a therapeutic option for patients with advanced melanoma.

Treatment of metastatic melanoma remains challenging, despite a variety of new and promising immunotherapeutic and targeted approaches to therapy. New treatment options are still needed to improve long-term tumour control. We present a case series of seven patients with metastatic melanoma who were treated individually with the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab between July 2014 and July 2015. Two of the patients were treated in an adjuvant setting. All patients had already received a variety of treatments. During an induction phase, the administration of four cycles of weekly rituximab 375 mg/m2 body surface area was planned. After imaging, patients with stable disease continued therapy with rituximab 375 mg/m2 body surface area every 4 weeks up to a maximum of 24 weeks. Two patients experienced grade 2 infusion reactions during the first infusion. Otherwise, treatment was well tolerated and there were no grade 3 or 4 side effects. Staging after the induction phase showed stable disease in five patients, and two patients had progressive disease. Median progression-free survival was 6.3 months (95% CI 4.97-7.53), median overall survival was 14.7 months (95% CI 4.52-24.94), and one patient was still alive in December 2016. In conclusion, rituximab might be a therapeutic option for metastatic melanoma. However, further studies on rituximab among larger patient cohorts are warranted. Evaluation of therapy in an adjuvant setting or in combination with other systemic treatment might, therefore, be of particular interest.

Progression patterns under BRAF inhibitor treatment and treatment beyond progression in patients with metastatic melanoma.

Despite markedly improved treatment options for metastatic melanoma, resistance to targeted therapies such as BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) or BRAFi plus MEK inhibitors (MEKi) remains a major problem. Our aim was to characterize progression on BRAFi therapy and outcome of subsequent treatment. One hundred and eighty patients with BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma who had progressed on treatment with single-agent BRAFi from February 2010 to April 2015 were included in a retrospective data analysis focused on patterns of progression, treatment beyond progression (TBP) and subsequent treatments after BRAFi therapy. Analysis revealed that 51.1% of patients progressed with both new and existing metastases opposed to progression of only preexisting (28.3%) or only new (20.6%) metastases. Exclusive extracranial progression occurred in 50.6% of patients compared to both extra- and intracranial (29.4%) or sole cerebral progression (20%). Multivariable analyses demonstrated that single site progression and primary response to BRAFi were associated with improved progression-free survival. Progression with exclusively new or only existing metastases and a baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) of 0 were associated with prolonged overall survival (OS). TBP had no significant impact on OS. Other subsequent treatments showed low efficacy with the exception of anti-PD-1 antibodies. In conclusion we identified specific patterns of progression which significantly correlate with further prognosis after progression on BRAFi treatment. In contrast to previously published data, we could not demonstrate a significant survival benefit for BRAFi TBP. Subsequent therapies had strikingly low efficacy except for PD-1 inhibitors.

Safe Administration of An Anti-PD-1 Antibody to Kidney-transplant Patients: 2 Clinical Cases and Review of the Literature.

Antiprogrammed cell-death protein 1 (PD-1) antibodies have revolutionized therapy of metastatic melanoma and other tumors, but some subgroups of patients such as immunosuppressed patients after solid-organ transplantation, have regularly been excluded from clinical studies. We report 2 cases of kidney-transplant patients who received an anti-PD-1 antibody to treat metastatic melanoma. Treatment was tolerated well with no relevant adverse events and stable kidney functions, but the melanoma progressed in both patients. Factors potentially affecting risk of allograft rejection and response to treatment, for example, immunosuppressive regimen and therapeutic sequence, are discussed on the basis of current literature. Further studies are necessary to determine the risk of allograft rejection and the therapeutic benefit of anti-PD-1 antibodies for organ-transplanted patients, in particular as these checkpoint inhibitors have become therapeutic standard in a variety of tumors other than melanoma.

Tadalafil has biologic activity in human melanoma. Results of a pilot trial with Tadalafil in patients with metastatic Melanoma (TaMe).

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are known to play a critical role in the suppression of T cell antitumor responses. Our preclinical data showed that the phosphodiesterase (PDE)-5 inhibitor sildenafil impaired MDSC functions, enhanced intratumoral T cell activity and prolonged survival of melanoma-bearing mice. In this study, we evaluated biologic effects, safety and efficacy of palliative treatment with the PDE-5 inhibitor tadalafil in metastatic melanoma patients. We conducted an open-label, dose de-escalation trial with tadalafil in pretreated metastatic melanoma patients. Tumor and peripheral blood samples were taken before and 4 weeks after the start of treatment. Samples were investigated by immunohistochemistry and FACS analysis, for different immune subsets with numbers of CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) as primary end point. Stable disease was achieved in 3/12 patients (25%). Median progression-free survival was 4.6 mo (range 0.7-7.1), median overall survival (OS) 8.5 mo (range 2.7-23.7). The treatment was well tolerated. Stable patients displayed significantly higher numbers of CD8+ TIL in the center of metastases before treatment as compared with progressive patients. Upon the therapy, they showed increased expression of ζ-chain (used as a marker of T cell activation) in CD8+ and CD4+TILs and CD8+T cells in the peripheral blood as compared with baseline. Our study suggests that the PDE-5 inhibitor tadalafil can improve clinical outcome of advanced melanoma patients by enhancing antitumor immunity and highlights its potential application in combined melanoma immunotherapy.

Anti-PD-1 antibodies in metastatic uveal melanoma: a treatment option?

Uveal melanomas (UMs) are a rare form of cancer with clinical and pathological characteristics distinct from cutaneous melanomas. Ipilimumab has shown efficacy and safety in the treatment of metastatic UM. This provides a rationale for treatment with other immune checkpoint inhibitors. This is a retrospective review of 15 patients with metastatic UM treated between June 2014 and February 2016, who received treatment with the anti-PD-1 Abs pembrolizumab or nivolumab. Patients were treated at two German university hospitals. Therapy was administered at the approved dosing schedules of 2 mg/kg q3w for pembrolizumab and 3 mg/kg q2w for nivolumab. Treatment was given until first tumor assessment and continued if tumor assessment showed disease control. Tumor assessments were performed at baseline and following scans every 12 weeks. Patients were monitored throughout for adverse events. Best response to treatment was stable disease in four patients. Eight out of 15 (53%) patients received treatment until first tumor assessment. As of February 2016, median progression-free survival (PFS) is 3 months (range 0.75-6.75 months) and overall survival (OS) is 5 months (range 1-16 months). Eight out of 15 (53%) patients are still alive (two patients lost to follow-up) with one out of four patients is in ongoing disease control. Patients with multiple organ metastases and elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase did not respond well to treatment. No objective response to PD-1 Ab therapy was seen. Best response to treatment was stable disease in four patients. Treatment was well tolerated with manageable toxicity.

Reinduction of PD1-inhibitor therapy: first experience in eight patients with metastatic melanoma.

Significant progress has been made in the treatment of metastatic melanoma during the last years. Approval of immune-checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies has been achieved recently. The sequencing of these therapies is an important issue. Here, we report our experience with the treatment and retreatment with PD1-inhibitors (PD1i) in eight patients. The patients (two female and seven male with a median age of 70 years, all melanoma stage IV, M1c) underwent a first treatment period with PD1i for a median of 5.5 months. Three (37.5%) patients had a stable disease as best response, two (25%) showed progression, two (25%) showed partial response, and one (12.5%) achieved complete remission. PD1i was discontinued due to disease progression in seven patients and due to side effects (pancreatitis) in one patient. Patients were subsequently treated with ipilimumab (n=2), or chemotherapy (n=4), or no other medical treatment (n=2). All eight patients were subsequently retreated with PD1i for a median of 2.5 months. One (12.5%) developed a partial response, whereas in three patients (37.5%) the disease was stabilized. PD1i have shown a high and durable response rate in the first-line treatment of metastatic melanoma. Our study suggests PD1i retreatment as a reasonable option for selected patients. Further investigations are needed to verify the value of PD1i re-exposure and to identify subgroups of patients who can benefit.

Immunotherapy of Melanoma.

Arising from melanocytes in skin, mucosal membranes, eye, and meninges, melanoma is a tumor that has been associated with poor prognosis in advanced disease stages. Given the poor response to chemotherapy and radiation therapy, new treatment approaches with targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and adoptive T-cell therapy have revolutionized the standard of care for patients with advanced melanoma. This review provides a short overview of past, present, and future immunotherapeutic approaches and their limitations, with a focus on new combination agents in early clinical trials.

Microbial contamination of anesthetic syringes in relation to different handling habits.

This single-center study prospectively assessed the microbial contamination of anesthetic syringes handled perioperatively under different conditions. We documented high rates of bacterial contamination, with strong but statistically nonsignificant differences between handling groups. Our results identify skin contact as the main source of contamination, and thus we emphasize the impact of proper hand hygiene.

Ipilimumab Therapy in Patients With Advanced Melanoma and Preexisting Autoimmune Disorders.

IMPORTANCE: Ipilimumab and other immune therapies are effective treatment options for patients with advanced melanoma but cause frequent immune-related toxic effects. Autoimmune diseases are common, and the safety and efficacy of ipilimumab therapy in patients with preexisting autoimmune disorders is not known. OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of ipilimumab therapy in patients with advanced melanoma with preexisting autoimmune disorders. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective review of patients with advanced melanoma and preexisting autoimmune disorders who received ipilimumab at 9 academic tertiary referral centers from January 1, 2012, through August 1, 2015. The data analysis was performed on August 24, 2015. EXPOSURE: Ipilimumab therapy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Safety, in terms of frequency of autoimmune flares and conventional immune-related adverse events (irAEs), and efficacy, in terms of response rates and overall survival, were evaluated descriptively. RESULTS: Of the 30 patients who received ipilimumab (17 [57%] male; median [range] age, 59.5 [30-80] y), 6 had rheumatoid arthritis, 5 had psoriasis, 6 had inflammatory bowel disease, 2 had systemic lupus erythematosus, 2 had multiple sclerosis, 2 had autoimmune thyroiditis, and 7 had other conditions. Thirteen patients (43%) were receiving immunosuppressive therapy at the time of initiation of ipilimumab therapy, most commonly low-dose prednisone or hydroxychloroquine. With ipilimumab treatment, 8 patients (27%) experienced exacerbations of their autoimmune condition necessitating systemic treatment; all were managed with corticosteroids. Conventional grade 3 to 5 irAEs occurred in 10 patients (33%) and were reversible with corticosteroids or with infliximab therapy in 2 cases. One patient with baseline psoriasis died of presumed immune-related colitis after a 1-week delay prior to reporting symptoms. Fifteen patients (50%) had neither autoimmune disease flares nor irAEs. Six patients experienced an objective response (20%), including 1 with a durable complete response. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: To our knowledge, this is the largest series of patients with preexisting autoimmune disease treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Ipilimumab was clinically active and was associated with exacerbations of autoimmune disease and conventional ipilimumab-induced irAEs that were readily manageable with standard therapies when started in a timely fashion. Ipilimumab therapy may be considered in this setting with vigilant clinical monitoring.