Multi-modal Pain Control Protocol Decreases Narcotic Consumption in an Inpatient Trauma Population.

INTRODUCTION: Opioid use after surgery or trauma has been implicated as a contributing factor to opioid dependence. The Acute Care Surgery (ACS) service at our community-based trauma center instituted an opioid-minimizing, multi-modal pain control (MMPC) protocol. The classes of pain medication included a non-opioid analgesic, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, a gabapentinoid, a skeletal muscle relaxant, and a topical anesthetic. We hypothesize that the MMPC will result in lower opioid consumption compared with the prior STP as evidenced by lower morphine milligram equivalents (MME) per day. METHODS: All adult patients (≥18 years) admitted to the ACS service from Jan 2014 to Dec 2015 and Jan 2018 to Dec 2019 were screened for inclusion. The standard pain control group (STP) and MMPC groups were defined by the year of admission. The primary outcome is opioid use per day, calculated in MME received. Secondary outcomes of the study include daily pain scores, incidence of opioid-related complications, death, ventilator days, intensive care unit length of stay, and hospital length of stay (HLOS) days. RESULTS: Multi-modal pain control protocol group was older and less injured than STP group. Daily opioid utilization was significantly less in the MMPC group (22.5 MMEs/d vs 60MMEs/d in the STP group, P < .0001). Additionally, daily pain scores were not different between groups. Secondary outcomes did not vary between the two groups. CONCLUSION: This study shows that implementation of a MMPC protocol resulted in lower opioid consumption in injured patients. Pain was equivalently controlled during the MMPC protocol period as demonstrated by similar pain scores.

Safety and Outcome of Intracranial Pressure Monitor Placement Performed by Trauma Critical Care Surgeons.

INTRODUCTION: The Brain Trauma Foundation advises intracranial pressure monitor placement (ICPM) following traumatic brain injury (TBI) with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score ≤8 and an abnormal head computed tomographic scan (CT) finding. Prior studies demonstrated that ICPMs could be placed by non-neurosurgeons. We hypothesized that ICPM placement by trauma critical care surgeons (TCCS) would increase appropriate utilization (AU), decrease time to placement (TTP), and have equivalent complications to those placed by neurosurgeons. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of adult trauma patients admitted with a TBI in a historical control group (HCG) and practice change group (PCG). Demographics, Injury Severity Score (ISS), outcomes, ICPM placement by provider type, and time to placement were identified. Complications and appropriate utilization were recorded. RESULTS: 70 patients in the HCG and 84 patients in the PCG met criteria for inclusion. Demographics, arrival GCS, ICU GCS, ISS, and admission APACHE II scores were not statistically significant. AU was 7/70 for HCG vs 19/84 in the PCG (P = .04036). Median TTP was 6.5 hours for HCG vs 5.25 for PCG (P = .9308). Interquartile range showed the data clustered around an earlier placement time, 2.3-14.0 hours, in the PCG. Complications between the 2 groups were not statistically significant, 0/7 for HCG vs 5/19 for PCG (P = .2782). DISCUSSION: This study confirms that ICPMs can be safely placed by TCCS. Our results demonstrate that placement of ICPMs by TCCS improves AU and possibly improves TTP.

Monitoring and feedback of hand hygiene compliance and the impact on facility-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

In 2006, we began monitoring hand hygiene compliance by direct observation. In 2006, with no changes in the methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) control program, a 38% reduction of facility-acquired rates for this organism was realized. These results indicate that focused monitoring of hand hygiene can reduce facility-acquired rates of MRSA.

Impact of implementing a method of feedback and accountability related to contact precautions compliance.

BACKGROUND: In January 2002, Infection control professionals for Spartanburg Regional Healthcare System held a planning retreat focused on patient safety. The main challenge discussed was the control of antibiotic-resistant organisms. Rounds on the patient care units had revealed compliance issues with the current isolation procedures. The team developed a process improvement project coined the Effective Processes in Infection Control Project (EPIC). With a broad challenge of antibiotic resistance, the focus was narrowed to isolation precautions for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). METHODS: The initial stage of the EPIC project was education, followed by routine unit rounds to monitor compliance. A tool was developed to provide immediate feedback for the nursing units. Summary reports were generated for clinical directors as a method of accountability for unit leadership. Rates for facility-acquired MRSA were monitored and compared with MRSA days at risk. RESULTS: Over a 1-year period of increased accountability, the facility-acquired rate of MRSA decreased by 30%, even though the days at risk increased. The decrease was maintained during year 2. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this project point to the importance of accountability with isolation precautions in the effort to combat the spread of MRSA in the hospital setting.