Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Clin Transl Sci ; 17(6): e13837, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38898561

ABSTRACT

Pharmacogenetic testing could reduce the time to identify a safe and effective medication for depression; however, it is underutilized in practice. Major depression constitutes the most common mental disorder in the US, and while antidepressant therapy can help, the current trial -and error approach can require patients to endure multiple medication trials before finding one that is effective. Tailoring the fit of pharmacogenetic testing with prescribers' needs across a variety of settings could help to establish a generalizable value proposition to improve likelihood of adoption. We conducted a study to explore the value proposition for health systems using pharmacogenetic testing for mental health medications through prescribers' real-world experiences using implementation science concepts and systematic interviews with prescribers and administrators from four health care systems. To identify a value proposition, we organized the themes according to the Triple Aim framework, a leading framework for health care policy which asserts that high-value care should focus on three key metrics: (1) better health care quality and (2) population-level outcomes with (3) reduced per capita costs. Primary care providers whom we interviewed said that they value pharmacogenetic testing because it would provide more information about medications that they can prescribe, expanding their ability to identify medications that best-fit patients and reducing their reliance on referrals to specialists; they said that this capacity would help meet patients' needs for access to mental health care through primary care. At the same time, prescribers expressed differing views about how pharmacogenetic testing can help with quality of care and whether their views about out-of-pocket cost would prevent them from offering it. Thus, implementation should focus on integrating pharmacogenetic testing into primary care and using strategies to support prescribers' interactions with patients.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents , Pharmacogenomic Testing , Primary Health Care , Humans , Pharmacogenomic Testing/economics , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder, Major/genetics , Quality of Health Care
2.
J Pers Med ; 12(8)2022 Aug 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36013262

ABSTRACT

Using a patient's genetic information to inform medication prescriptions can be clinically effective; however, the practice has not been widely implemented. Health systems need guidance on how to engage with providers to improve pharmacogenetic test utilization. Approaches from the field of implementation science may shed light on the complex factors affecting pharmacogenetic test use in real-world settings and areas to target to improve utilization. This paper presents an approach to studying the application of precision medicine that utilizes mixed qualitative and quantitative methods and implementation science frameworks to understand which factors or combinations consistently account for high versus low utilization of pharmocogenetic testing. This approach involves two phases: (1) collection of qualitative and quantitative data from providers-the cases-at four clinical institutions about their experiences with, and utilization of, pharmacogenetic testing to identify salient factors; and (2) analysis using a Configurational Comparative Method (CCM), using a mathematical algorithm to identify the minimally necessary and sufficient factors that distinguish providers who have higher utilization from those with low utilization. Advantages of this approach are that it can be used for small to moderate sample sizes, and it accounts for conditions found in real-world settings by demonstrating how they coincide to affect utilization.

3.
Adv Neonatal Care ; 17(4): 292-298, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27926583

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the leading viral cause of death in infants younger than 1 year. In July 2014, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Committee on Infectious Diseases concluded that the "limited clinical benefit" for infants born at more than 29 weeks' gestation, together with the associated high cost of the immunoprophylaxis, no longer supported the routine use of palivizumab (Synagis). PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of the newly adopted AAP palivizumab prophylaxis administration on health and subsequent hospital costs of infants born between 29 and less than 32 weeks' gestation. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis from a single institution across the duration of the study comparing the clinical and financial outcomes of infants (aged < 32 weeks) treated under the 2009 AAP guidelines (PRE) and infants (aged >29 weeks) managed after the 2014 AAP guidelines (POST) took effect. RESULTS: RSV-positive admissions were greater in the POST cohort versus the PRE cohort (P = .04). There were no readmission deaths due to RSV infection in either cohort. The number needed to treat to avoid a single RSV-positive hospitalization was 20 infants at an estimated palivizumab cost of $90,000 to avoid an estimated hospital cost of $29,000. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Assessment of individual risk factors and their ability to predict severe RSV risk/disease, thus, would allow providers greater flexibility in determining need for prophylaxis therapy. IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH: Longitudinal evaluation of financial and clinical outcomes is needed to determine the impact of the 2014 AAP revised regulatory guidelines.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/economics , Immunoglobulins, Intravenous/economics , Palivizumab/economics , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/economics , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/economics , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Hospitalization/economics , Humans , Immunoglobulins, Intravenous/therapeutic use , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Palivizumab/therapeutic use , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/drug therapy , Respiratory Syncytial Viruses , Retrospective Studies
4.
Ann Pharmacother ; 45(12): 1571-5, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22045905

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ferumoxytol for use in magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of the vasculature. DATA SOURCES: Literature was accessed through MEDLINE (1946-September 2011) and EMBASE (1947-September 2011) using the terms ferumoxytol, magnetic resonance imaging and angiography, blood pool agent, and superparamagnetic iron oxide. Reference citations from identified publications were reviewed for relevant information. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All English-language articles and human studies (N = 9) were identified that evaluated ferumoxytol use in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Articles that evaluated the use of the drug in first-pass and equilibrium phase imaging of the vasculature were included (n = 4). DATA SYNTHESIS: Contrast agents for MRI improve disease characterization and diagnosis. Ferumoxytol, a medication approved for treatment of iron deficiency anemia in adults with chronic kidney disease, has superparamagnetic properties. As a blood pool agent, ferumoxytol remains primarily in the intravascular space. Therefore, its use in MRI may increase image sensitivity and specificity and have a decreased adverse effect profile compared to other contrast agents. Specifically, ferumoxytol may be an option for MRA, a specific type of MRI that images blood vessels. In the 4 studies evaluated here, ferumoxytol was administered primarily to healthy adults as an accumulative dose of 4 mg Fe/kg injected at 1 mL/sec. Not all studies reported adverse events and addressed safety monitoring. The evaluated studies are limited by small size, open-label design, and noncomparative methodology. CONCLUSIONS: Data from small pilot studies suggest that ferumoxytol may improve image quality in MRA; however, further investigation is necessary to establish its efficacy and safety. Large randomized, active-comparator trials are needed to establish optimal dosing, imaging procedures, and safety monitoring.


Subject(s)
Contrast Media , Ferrosoferric Oxide , Magnetic Resonance Angiography/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Humans , Pilot Projects , Sensitivity and Specificity
5.
Ann Pharmacother ; 44(1): 185-91, 2010 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20028959

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of melatonin for the treatment of insomnia in pediatric patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). DATA SOURCES: Literature was accessed through MEDLINE (1948-August 2009), EMBASE (1950-August 2009), and Scopus (1960-August 2009) using the terms melatonin, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), pediatric, insomnia, sleep disorder, and sleep. In addition, reference citations from publications identified were reviewed for relevant information. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All English-language articles and human studies were identified and evaluated. Results from all identified randomized trials (n = 5), safety studies (n = 1), long-term follow-up studies (n = 1), post hoc retrospective analyses (n = 1), meta-analyses (n = 2), review articles (n = 9), and letters (n = 1) were summarized. DATA SYNTHESIS: Pediatric insomnia is prevalent in children with ADHD and impacts academic performance, social functioning, overall health, and family life. First-line therapy includes ruling out differential diagnoses, optimizing ADHD stimulant treatment, and initiating good sleep hygiene and behavioral therapy. Adjuvant pharmacotherapy is then an option and melatonin is often prescribed. Melatonin regulates circadian rhythm sleep disorders such as sleep-onset insomnia (SOI) in children with ADHD. Four studies in children with ADHD and insomnia showed improvement in sleep onset and sleep latency. Studies included children 6-14 years old and melatonin doses ranged from 3 to 6 mg administered within a few hours of a scheduled bedtime. In all studies, adverse events were transient and mild. The available melatonin studies are limited by small size and short duration; variable SOI criteria, ADHD criteria, and treatment assessments; and lack of generalizability. CONCLUSIONS: Available data suggest that melatonin is a well-tolerated and efficacious treatment option for pediatric patients with chronic SOI and ADHD. Regulated melatonin products and larger, well-designed trials to establish optimal dosing regimens and long-term safety are needed.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/complications , Melatonin/therapeutic use , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/drug therapy , Child , Humans , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/complications
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...