Reoperation Rate for Residual/Regrowth Adenoma Following Transurethral Interventions for Benign Prostatic Enlargement: Results from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Randomized Studies.

Objective: To perform a systematic review to assess the incidence of reoperation rate for residual/regrowth adenoma after transurethral surgeries for benign prostatic enlargement. Materials and Methods: A systematic literature search was performed on November 12, 2023, using Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, and Scopus. We only included randomized studies comparing monopolar (M)/bipolar (B) transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) vs ablation vs enucleation procedures. Incidence of reoperation was assessed using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel Method and reported as risk ratio (RR), 95% confidence interval (CI), and p-values. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Evidence synthesis: Forty-eight studies were included. Six studies compared enucleation vs TURP, 41 ablation vs TURP, and 1 study enucleation vs ablation vs TURP, encompassing 457 patients in enucleation, 2259 in ablation, and 2517 in the TURP group. The pooled incidence of reoperation was 6.2%, 0.7%, 2.3%, and 4.3% after ablation, enucleation, M-TURP, and B-TURP, respectively. Meta-analysis showed that the incidence of reoperation was significantly lower in the enucleation group (RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.10-0.81, p = 0.02), but the difference accounted only in studies with follow-up between 1 and 3 years (RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.04-0.85, p = 0.03). The incidence of reoperation was significantly lower in the enucleation compared with the B-TURP group (RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.03-0.77, p = 0.02). Meta-analysis showed that the incidence of reoperation was significantly higher in the ablation group (RR 1.81, 95% CI 1.33-2.47, p = 0.0002), but there was no difference in studies with follow-up up to 1 year (odds ratio 1.78 95% CI 0.97-3.29, p = 0.06) longer than 5 years (RR 2.02, 95% CI 0.71-5.79, p = 0.19). The incidence of reoperation was significantly higher in the ablation compared with the M-TURP group (RR 1.91, 95% CI 1.44-2.54, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: In mid-term follow-up, reoperation rate for residual/regrowth adenoma was significantly lower after enucleation, although was significantly higher after ablation compared with TURP.

Laparoscopic and Open Nephron-Sparing Surgery for Radius Exophytic/Endophytic Nearness Anterior/ Posterior Location Nephrometry Score 7 and Higher Kidney Tumors: A Comparison of Oncological and Functional Outcomes Using the Pentafecta Score.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate oncological and functional outcomes of nephron- sparing surgery by comparing open and laparoscopic approaches in a consecutive series of patients with intermediate and high complexity renal masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all nephron-sparing surgery cases in 2 referral centers from January 2013 to January 2020. Tumor complexity was graded according to radius exophytic/endophytic nearness anterior/posterior location nephrometry score. Patients with a single kidney tumor with a radius exophytic/endophytic nearness anterior/posterior location score ≥ 7 were evaluated. Exclusion criteria were solitary kidney, multiple/bilateral tumors, and a low radius exophytic/endophytic nearness Anterior/Posterior location score (<7). Patients were divided according to the surgical approach: the laparoscopic tumor enucleation and the open wedge resection groups. The Trifecta and Pentafecta score achievement rates were assessed. RESULTS: Two hundred thirteen patients were included in the analysis, 76 in laparoscopic tumor enucleation group and 137 in the open wedge resection group. There were no statistically significant differences in preoperative data between laparoscopic tumor enucleation and open wedge resection groups, except for the higher percentage of T1a masses in the latter group. The mean 24-hour blood loss and length of stay were higher in the open wedge resection group. Minor and major postoperative complication rates were comparable. No significant difference in terms of the Trifecta score was reported. Pentafecta score was achieved in 35/76 (46.1%) and 61/137 (44.5%) cases in the laparoscopic tumor enucleation and open wedge resection groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that laparoscopic tumor enucleation was associated with significantly lower blood and length of stay. Postoperative complications and the achievement of the Pentafecta score were similar in both surgical approaches.

Real-world Global Outcomes of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in Anomalous Kidneys: A High Volume International Multicenter Study.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the trends and outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of urolithiasis in anomalous kidneys in a large international multicenter series. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We designed a multicentric retrospective study. Nineteen high-volume centers worldwide were included. Pre-, peri- and postoperative data were collected, and a subgroup analysis was performed according to renal anomaly. RESULTS: We analyzed 414 procedures: 119 (28.7%) were horseshoe kidneys, 102 (24.6%) pelvic ectopic kidneys, 69 (16.7%) malrotated kidneys and 50 (12.1%) diverticular calculus. The average size (SD) of the stone was 13.9 (±6) millimeters and 193 (46.6%) patients had a pre-operative stent. In 249 cases (60.1%) a disposable scope was used. A UAS (ureteral access sheath) was used in 373 (90%) patients. A Holmium laser was used in 391 (94.4%) patients. The average (SD) operating time was 65.3 (±24.2) minutes. Hematuria, caliceal perforation and difficulty in stone localisation were mostly seen in diverticular stones and difficulty in UAS placement and lithotripsy in the cases of renal malrotation. The overall complication rate was 12%. Global stone-free rate was 79.2%. Residual fragments (RF) were significantly lesser in the pre-stented group (P <.05). Diverticular calculi was the group with more RF and needed ancillary procedures (P <.05). CONCLUSION: Retrograde intrarenal surgery in patients with anomalous kidneys is safe and effective with a high single-stage stone-free rate and low complication rate. There is a trend toward using smaller and disposable scopes and smaller UAS. Diverticular stones can still be challenging with higher rates of intraoperative hematuria, caliceal perforation and RF.

Are ultrasonographic measurements a reliable parameter to choose non-palpable testicular masses amenable to treatment with sparing surgery?

PURPOSE: To analyze the dimensional characteristics between non-palpable testicular masses detected during ultrasonographic (US) study and their postoperative dimensions reported in definitive histological diagnosis, and evaluate if the sonographic measurements may be a relevant parameter to improve the identification of testicular lesions amenable to treatment with testicular-sparing surgery (TSS). METHODS: A total of 77 patients who underwent radical orchiectomy or TSS for non-palpable testicular masses suspected for malignant neoplasms were included into this study. Preoperative US studies were also carried out in all patients to evaluate the diameter, volume and sonographic characteristics of the testicular lesions and the contralateral testes. All patients underwent inguinal orchiectomy or testicular exploration (for masses ≤1.5 cm) through an inguinal approach. RESULTS: The mean age at the time of diagnosis was 36.5 years. The predominant finding was a hypoechoic mass (71.4%). The vast majority of all malignant masses appeared markedly hypoechoic (89.8%); moreover, this differed significantly from benign lesions (39.3%, p<0.001). Calcified lesions were significantly associated with benign tumors (77.8%, p<0.002). The mean maximum lesion diameter of the affected testicle determined by preoperative US study was 14.1 mm (range 7-21). The mean maximum lesion determined postoperatively by pathology was 13.4 mm (range 5-20). Tumor lesions estimated by US study were more accurate in benign tumors, but the results were not statistically significant (p=0.323). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that the sonographic diameter of the testicular lesions seems to be one of the most important parameter for the indication of an elective TSS and US is an accurate method for detecting and measuring these lesions.