ZD9331: discovery to clinical development.

Thymidylate synthase (TS) has been targeted in cancer therapy for many years. As a result of a prolonged and extensive drug development program specific TS inhibitors have come into clinical practice. Following on from the development of the polyglutamatable TS inhibitor raltitrexed (Tomudex, ZD1694), ZD9331 is a rationally designed third-generation specific inhibitor of TS that does not require polyglutamation for its activity. Its development was based on the dual rationale of increased efficacy, by overcoming the potential for resistance due to reduced expression of folylpolyglutamate synthetase (FPGS), whilst potentially reducing the toxicities associated with polyglutamation and drug retention in normal tissues. Preclinical studies have shown it to be transported by the ubiquitously expressed reduced folate carrier as well as the alpha-folate receptor which is overexpressed in some cancers, especially ovarian. In vivo studies demonstrated a broad range of activity, leading to an extensive phase I program with several administration schedules. Whilst not being targeted to any individual tumor type, a large number of phase I, II, monotherapy and combination studies have been undertaken, and overall activity has been most promising, particularly in platinum-refractory relapsed ovarian, pancreatic and gastric cancers. Its role in the treatment of these diseases may be important, especially if patients were to be selected on the basis of their folate transport and FPGS status. The true potential of the drug remains to be determined.

Phase I study of irinotecan and raltitrexed in patients with advanced gastrointestinal tract adenocarcinoma.

To determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of irinotecan and raltitrexed given as sequential short infusions every 3 weeks, 33 patients with pretreated gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma (31 colorectal, 2 oesophagogastric) entered this open label dose-escalation study. For the first five dose levels patients received irinotecan 175-350 mg m(-2) followed by raltitrexed 2.6 mg m(-2). Level VI was irinotecan 350 mg m(-2) plus raltitrexed 3.0 mg m(-2), level VII was irinotecan 400 mg m(-2) plus raltitrexed 2.6 mg m(-2); 261 courses were administered. Only one patient at dose levels I-V experienced DLT. At level VI, 5/12 patients experienced DLT: one had grade 3 diarrhoea and lethargy, one had grade 4 diarrhoea and one had lethargy alone. Two others had lethargy caused by disease progression. There was no first-cycle neutropenia. At level VII, 3/6 patients experienced dose-limiting lethargy, one also had grade 3 diarrhoea. Dose intensity fell from over 90% for both drugs at level VI to 83% for irinotecan and 66% for raltitrexed at level VII. Lethargy was therefore the DLT, and level VII the MTD. Pharmacokinetic data showed no measurable drug interaction; 6/30 patients (20%) had objective responses. This combination is active with manageable toxicity. Recommended doses for further evaluation are irinotecan 350 mg m(-2) and raltitrexed 3.0 mg m(-2).