Overview of dermatologic tele-expertise in areas of low physician density: A retrospective study at Le Mans general hospital.

BACKGROUND: In areas of low physician density, especially as regards dermatologists in France, there is an increasing interest in tele-expertise. This is particularly the case in the Sarthe department, where the number of physicians continues to decline and access to care was further limited by the COVID 19 epidemic. STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively collected data from tele-expertise requests submitted to Le Mans General Hospital by general practitioners via a dedicated platform between May 6, 2019, and April 9, 2021. RESULTS: Six hundred and forty three requests relating to 90 different diagnoses were recorded during this period. One hundred and thirty four patients (20% of requests) were invited to attend a face-to-face consultation within an average of 29 days. DISCUSSION: Through the use of tele-expertise at Le Mans Genreal Hospital it was possible to introduce a means of tackling the problem of the lack of dermatologists in the Sarthe department. Rapid responses enabled the number of consultation requests to be reduced, leading to fewer population displacements in the context of the present pandemic. CONCLUSION: These initial results are encouraging and confirm that tele-expertise seems a satisfactory option to optimize access to care for populations in areas of low physician density.

Impact of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic on the treatment of psoriasis with systemic therapies in France: Results from the PSOBIOTEQ cohort.

BACKGROUND: The nature of the COVID-19 pandemic led to concerns among patients and physicians about the potential impact of immunosuppressive treatments for chronic diseases such as psoriasis on the risk of severe COVID-19. OBJECTIVES: To describe treatment modifications and determine the incidence of COVID-19 infection among psoriasis patients during the first wave of the pandemic, and identify the factors associated with these events. METHODS: Data from PSOBIOTEQ cohort relating to the first COVID-19 wave in France (March to June, 2020), as well as a patient-centred COVID-19 questionnaire, were used to evaluate the impact of lockdown on changes (discontinuations, delays or reductions) in systemic therapies, and to determine the incidence of COVID-19 cases among these patients. Logistic regression models were used to assess associated factors. RESULTS: Among the 1751 respondents (89.3%), 282 patients (16.9%) changed their systemic treatment for psoriasis, with 46.0% of these changes being initiated by the patients themselves. Patients were more likely to experience psoriasis flare-ups during the first wave if they changed their treatment during this period (58.7% vs 14.4%; P < 0.0001). Changes to systemic therapies were less frequent among patients with cardiovascular diseases (P < 0.001), and those aged ≥ 65 years (P = 0.02). Overall, 45 patients (2.9%) reported having COVID-19, and eight (17.8%) required hospitalization. Risk factors for COVID-19 infection were close contact with a positive case (P < 0.001) and living in a region with a high incidence of COVID-19 (P < 0.001). Factors associated with a lower risk of COVID-19 were avoiding seeing a physician (P = 0.002), systematically wearing a mask during outings (P = 0.011) and being a current smoker (P = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: Discontinuation of systemic psoriasis treatments during the first COVID-19 wave (16.9%) - mainly decided by patients themselves (46.0%) - was associated with a higher incidence of disease flares (58.7% vs 14.4%). This observation and factors associated with a higher risk of COVID-19 highlight the need to maintain and adapt patient-physician communication during health crises according to patient profiles, with the aim of avoiding unnecessary treatment discontinuations and ensuring that patients are informed about the risk of infection and the importance of complying with hygiene rules.

Switches between biologics in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis: results from the French cohort PSOBIOTEQ.

BACKGROUND: Biologics are the cornerstone of treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and switches between biologics are frequently needed to maintain clinical improvement over time. OBJECTIVES: The main purpose of this study was to describe precisely switches between biologics and how their pattern changed over time with the recent availability of new biologic agents. METHODS: We included patients receiving a first biologic agent in the Psobioteq multicenter cohort of adults with moderate-to-severe psoriasis receiving systemic treatment. We described switches between biologics with chronograms, Sankey and Sunburst diagrams, assessed cumulative incidence of first switch by competing risks survival analysis and reasons for switching. We assessed the factors associated with the type of switch (intra-class - i.e. within the same therapeutic class - vs. inter-class) in patients switching from a TNF-alpha inhibitor using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 2153 patients was included. The cumulative incidence of switches from first biologic was 34% at 3 years. Adalimumab and ustekinumab were the most prescribed biologic agents as first and second lines of treatment. The main reason for switching was loss of efficacy (72%), followed by adverse events (11%). Patients receiving a TNF-alpha inhibitor before 2016 mostly switched to ustekinumab, whereas those switching in 2016 or after mostly switched to an IL-17 inhibitor. Patients switching from a first-line TNF-alpha inhibitor before 2016 were more likely to switch to another TNF-alpha inhibitor compared with patients switching since 2018. Patients switching from etanercept were more likely to receive another TNF-alpha inhibitor rather than another therapeutic class of bDMARD compared with patients switching from adalimumab. CONCLUSION: This study described the switching patterns of biologic treatments and showed how they changed over time, due to the availability of the new biologic agents primarily IL-17 inhibitors.

Leg ulcers in childhood: A multicenter study in France.

BACKGROUND: Leg ulcers in adults are a major public health concern. Their incidence increases with age and many causes have been identified, predominantly associated with vascular diseases. Leg ulcers in children and teenagers are less frequent. The aim of our study was to identify the causes of leg ulcers in children and teenagers, and to evaluate their management. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study was conducted by members of the Angio-dermatology Group of the French Society of Dermatology and of the French Society of Pediatric Dermatology. Data from children and teenagers (< 18 years), seen between 2008 and 2020 in 12 French hospitals for chronic leg ulcer (disease course>4 weeks), were included. RESULTS: We included 27 patients, aged from 2.3 to 17.0 years. The most frequent causes of leg ulcer were: general diseases (n=9: pyoderma gangrenosum, dermatomyositis, interferonopathy, sickle cell disease, prolidase deficiency, scleroderma, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome), vasculopathies (n=8: hemangioma, capillary malformation, arteriovenous malformation), trauma (n=4: bedsores, pressure ulcers under plaster cast), infectious diseases (n=4: pyoderma, tuberculosis, Buruli ulcer) and neuropathies (n=2). Comorbidities (59.3%) and chronic treatments (18.5%) identified as risk factors for delayed healing were frequent. The average time to healing was 9.1 months. DISCUSSION: Leg ulcers are less frequent in children and teenagers than in adults and their causes differ from those in adults. Comorbidities associated with delayed healing must be identified and managed. Children and teenagers tend to heal faster than adults, but a multidisciplinary management approach is necessary.

Users of biologics in clinical practice: would they be eligible for phase III clinical studies? Cohort Study in the French Psoriasis Registry PSOBIOTEQ.

BACKGROUND: Numerous inclusion and exclusion criteria are involved in phase III moderate to severe psoriasis trials investigating the safety and efficacy of biologics. This questions the generalization of results. METHODS: In this cohort study, we applied inclusion/exclusion criteria for phase III trials from original protocols (adalimumab - REVEAL, ustekinumab - PHOENIX, brodalumab - AMAGINE, secukinumab FIXTURE) to all patients enrolled in the PsoBioTeq prospective registry who received a biological agent for the first time between July 2012 and November 2017. We then compared the efficacy, drug survival and occurrence of adverse events between patients who satisfied/did not satisfy the eligibility criteria for these phase III trials. RESULTS: A total of 1267 patients were enrolled, of whom 993 (78.4%) were not eligible for at least one RCT (randomized controlled trial) and 251 (19.1%) did not meet the PASI/PGA severity requirements. Apart from disease severity, the most frequent criteria resulting in exclusion were as follows: non-plaque psoriasis (12.6%), significant cardiac disease (8.4%), significant liver disease (7.3%), elevated liver enzymes (4.9-9.6%) and personal history of diabetes (9.2%). There was no difference in drug survival between the two groups. The incidence ratio of adverse events was significantly lower in eligible versus non-eligible patients [0.78 (95% CI 0.62-0.97) (P = 0.03)]. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients treated with biologics in the PsoBioTeq real-life registry would not have been eligible for phase III moderate to severe psoriasis trials. Patients not eligible for psoriasis phase III clinical trials have a higher incidence of adverse events.

Rituximab is an effective treatment in patients with pemphigus vulgaris and demonstrates a steroid-sparing effect.

BACKGROUND: Corticosteroids (CS) with or without adjuvant immunosuppressant agents are standard treatment for pemphigus vulgaris (PV). The efficacy of adjuvant therapies in minimizing steroid-related adverse events (AEs) is unproven. OBJECTIVES: To utilize data collected in a French investigator-initiated, phase III, open-label, randomized controlled trial to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of rituximab and seek approval for its use in PV. METHODS: This was an independently conducted post hoc analysis of the moderate-to-severe PV subset enrolled in the Ritux 3 study. Patients were randomized to rituximab plus 0·5 or 1·0 mg kg-1 per day prednisone tapered over 3 or 6 months, or 1·0 or 1·5 mg kg-1 per day prednisone alone tapered over 12 or 18 months, respectively (according to disease severity). The primary end point was complete remission at month 24 without CS (CRoff) for ≥ 2 months, and 24-month efficacy and safety results were also reported. RESULTS: At month 24, 34 of 38 patients (90%) on rituximab plus prednisone achieved CRoff ≥ 2 months vs. 10 of 36 patients (28%) on prednisone alone. Median total cumulative prednisone dose was 5800 mg in the rituximab plus prednisone arm vs. 20 520 mg for prednisone alone. Eight of 36 patients (22%) who received prednisone alone withdrew from treatment owing to AEs; one rituximab-plus-prednisone patient withdrew due to pregnancy. Overall, 24 of 36 patients (67%) on prednisone alone experienced a grade 3/4 CS-related AE vs. 13 of 38 patients (34%) on rituximab plus prednisone. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with moderate-to-severe PV, rituximab plus short-term prednisone was more effective than prednisone alone. Patients treated with rituximab had less CS exposure and were less likely to experience severe or life-threatening CS-related AEs. What's already known about this topic? Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is the most common type of pemphigus. Corticosteroids, a standard first-line treatment for PV, have significant side-effects. Although their effects are unproven, adjuvant corticosteroid-sparing agents are routinely used to minimize steroid exposure and corticosteroid-related side-effects. There is evidence that the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab is effective in the treatment of patients with severe recalcitrant pemphigus and in patients with newly diagnosed pemphigus. What does this study add? This study provides a more detailed analysis of patients with PV enrolled in an investigator-initiated trial. Rituximab plus prednisone had a steroid-sparing effect and more patients achieved complete remission off prednisone. Fewer patients experienced grade 3 or grade 4 steroid-related adverse events than those on prednisone alone. This collaboration between academia and industry, utilizing independent post hoc analyses, led to regulatory authority approvals of rituximab in moderate-to-severe PV.

Tattoo complications in treated and non-treated psoriatic patients.

BACKGROUND: Tattooing is a widespread phenomenon, with an estimated prevalence of 10-30% in Western populations. For psoriasis patients, current recommendations are to avoid having a tattoo if the disease is active and they are receiving immunosuppressive treatments. Although scientific data supporting these recommendations are lacking, dermatologists are often reluctant to advocate tattooing in psoriasis patients. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the frequency of tattoo complications in patients with psoriasis and determine whether the occurrence of complications was associated with psoriasis status and treatments received at the time of tattooing. METHODS: We performed a multicentre cross-sectional study. Adults with psoriasis were consecutively included and classified as tattooed or non-tattooed. Prevalence of complications associated with tattoos was then evaluated according to psoriasis onset and treatments. The study was divided into three parts, in which data were collected through a series of questionnaires filled in by the dermatologist. Complications included pruritus, oedema, allergic reaction/eczema, infection/superinfection, granuloma, lichenification, photosensitivity, Koebner phenomenon and psoriasis flare after tattooing. Diagnosis of complications was made retrospectively. RESULTS: We included 2053 psoriatic patients, 20.2% had 894 tattoos. Amongst non-tattooed patients, 15.4% had wished to be tattooed, with psoriasis being stated as a reason for not having a tattoo by 44.0% and 5.7% indicating that they planned to have a tattoo in the future. Local complications, such as oedema, pruritus, allergy and Koebner phenomenon, were reported in tattoos in 6.6%, most frequently in patients with psoriasis requiring treatment at the time of tattooing (P < 0.0001). No severe complications were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of tattoo complications in psoriasis patients was low. Although the risk of complications was highest amongst patients with psoriasis requiring treatment at the time of tattooing, all the complications observed were benign. These results can be helpful for practitioners to give objective information to patients.

Methotrexate efficacy and tolerance in plaque psoriasis. A prospective real-life multicentre study in France.

BACKGROUND: Methotrexate (MTX) is a major systemic treatment for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. A randomized trial has recently been published evaluating a single weekly dosage (17.5mg), but few prospective real-life data are available. The main objective of this study was to prospectively evaluate the efficacy of MTX in real-life. The secondary objectives were to evaluate predictive parameters for treatment efficacy and the frequency of adverse events. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort involving consecutive at in 25 centres belonging to GEM RESOPSO included all adults with plaque psoriasis in whom MTX treatment was initiated. The efficacy criterion was achievement of PASI 75 at week (W) 12/16. The impact of demographic data, psoriasis characteristics (duration, topography, rheumatism), dosage (W12/16 dosage, cumulative dose after 4 weeks), and mode of administration (subcutaneous vs. oral, concomitant use of folic acid) on efficacy was evaluated. Intention-to-treat (ITT),per protocol (PP), and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty-six patients (F/M: 105/151; mean age: 45.0 years; rheumatism: 12.6%) with plaque psoriasis were included. 99 patients were not analysed at W12/16 (16 because of inefficacy, 16 because of intolerance, 56 were lost to follow-up or had data missing). PASI 75 was achieved in 98 patients, with efficacy of 38.3% in the ITT analysis and 58.3% in the PP analysis. In the ITT analysis, absence of previous use of cyclosporine (P=0.01) and a cumulative dose of MTX>60mg after 4 weeks (P<0.0001) were associated with higher PASI 75 rates. In the PP analysis, only absence of previous use of cyclosporine (P=0.0009) was associated with a better PASI 75 results. There was no association between PASI 75 and patient characteristics (including body mass index), clinical aspects of psoriasis, route of administration, combination with folic acid, or W12/16 dose. Adverse events were reported by 34.8% of patients. These consisted mainly of digestive disorders (nausea, abdominal pain), asthenia and moderate hepatic cytolysis. The frequency of adverse events was correlated with methotrexate dosage. DISCUSSION: The efficacy of MTX in plaque psoriasis in this real-life study of 256 patients is consistent with the data in the literature, including the recently published randomized trial (41% PASI 75). This rate was unaffected by patient weight, route of administration and combined use of folic acid. Absence of previous use of cyclosporine appears to be associated with better efficacy although there is no clear explanation for this. The initial dosage (high dose in the first month) appears to be associated with superior efficacy for W12/W16.

Trends in hospitalization rates for psoriasis flares since the introduction of biologics: a time series in France between 2005 and 2015.

BACKGROUND: In the late 2000s, the introduction of biologics transformed the prognosis for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. We hypothesized that treatment with biologics may associate with a reduction in the hospitalization rate for psoriasis flares. OBJECTIVE: To analyse changes over time in the hospitalization rate for psoriasis flares. METHODS: We included inpatient stays in any of nine French hospitals between 2005 and 2015 for a psoriasis flare, as documented in the national inpatient database. In two centres, we also analysed data from the individual patients' electronic medical records. RESULTS: A total of 3572 stays were included. The introduction of biologics was not associated with a decrease in the number of hospitalizations for a psoriasis flare; on the contrary, we observed a non-significant increase in the number of hospitalizations (13 hospitalizations for psoriasis flares per quarter per 10 000 beds). In the two-centre study, the introduction of biologics was associated with a significant increase in the hospitalization of patients receiving topical treatments only (520 hospitalizations per year per 10 000 beds) and those with a first psoriasis flare. CONCLUSION: The number of hospitalizations for a psoriasis flare tended to increase between 2005 and 2015. The availability of additional treatment options might have increased patient demand and/or broadened the indications in clinical practice.

[Misdiagnosis of hidradenitis suppurativa continues to be a major issue. The R-ENS Verneuil study]. / Errance médicale des patients atteints d'hidradénite suppurée : un problème majeur et persistant. Étude « R-ENS Verneuil ¼.

OBJECTIVE: To provide physicians with an understanding of the factors behind significant delays in the diagnosis of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) in France. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective multicentre national study conducted from October 2015 to March 2016 included all patients consulting for HS. Patient data were collected by means of a standardized questionnaire. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to collect factors associated with a significant time to diagnosis of at least 5.5years, defined as the period between the onset of initial clinical signs and the time of formal diagnosis. RESULTS: The 16 participating centres enrolled 312 patients (62% women), of average age 35years. The average age at onset of HS was 22years. Before formal diagnosis by a dermatologist (64% of cases), 170 (54%), 114 (37%) and 45 (15%) patients had previously consulted at least 3, 5 and 10 general physicians, respectively. The average time between the initial clinical signs of HS, the first dermatology visit and the definitive diagnosis was 6.2 and 8.4 years, respectively. Active smoking (OR adjusted 1.85; P=0.027) and disease onset at a younger age (adjusted OR 0.92; P<0.001) were both associated with significant delays in diagnosis. CONCLUSION: These results emphasized misdiagnosis among HS patients but did not evidence any association between either sociodemographic or economic characteristics and the existence of significant times to diagnosis.

Drug survival and postdrug survival of first-line immunosuppressive treatments for atopic dermatitis: comparison between methotrexate and cyclosporine.

INTRODUCTION: Cyclosporine and methotrexate are the two preferred first-line immunosuppressive treatments in atopic dermatitis. The aim of this study was to compare the treatment profiles of methotrexate and cyclosporine in daily practice as the first-line immunosuppressive treatment in atopic dermatitis, using two survival analyses, 'drug survival' (time on the drug) and 'postdrug survival' (time between two drugs). METHODS: Retrospective study including patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis treated with methotrexate or cyclosporine as the first-line immunosuppressive treatment. The reasons for discontinuation of treatment were collected as follows: controlled disease, treatment failure, side event pregnancy and non-compliance. 'Drug survival' and 'postdrug survival' analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and predictive factors were analysed using uni- and multivariate Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients, among whom 25 patients treated with cyclosporine and 31 with methotrexate (median age: 34 ± 15 years), were included between 2007 and 2016. Reasons for discontinuation were not significantly different between 'controlled disease' and other reasons (P = 0.11). The median 'drug survival' was significantly longer for methotrexate (23 months) than for cyclosporine (8 months) (P < 0.0001). Six months from baseline, 93% of patients treated with methotrexate were still being treated vs 63% among patients treated with cyclosporine. The median of 'postdrug survival' was significantly longer for methotrexate (12 months) than for cyclosporine (2 months). Only treatment with CYC was a predictive factor for decreased 'drug survival' and 'postdrug survival'. CONCLUSION: This is the first direct comparison between methotrexate and cyclosporine as first-line immunosuppressive treatments for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in daily practice. We evidenced two different treatment profiles: the duration of methotrexate administration is longer than that of cyclosporine. 'Postdrug survival' could be a new tool to assess the maintenance of effect of a drug after withdrawal in atopic dermatitis, and more broadly in chronic skin disease.

Clinical and haemodynamic risk factors associated with discrepancies in lower limb length with capillary malformations: data from the national paediatric French cohort CONAPE.

BACKGROUND: Genetics discoveries have allowed for a better understanding of capillary malformations (CMs) associated with overgrowth syndrome. However, molecular analyses are still not easy to perform or interpret. Other analytical methods are needed. OBJECTIVES: To identify clinical and haemodynamic factors associated with leg length discrepancy (LLD) in children with CMs of the lower limbs. METHODS: Data were obtained from the multicentre French national cohort CONAPE (COhorte Nationale d'enfants atteints d'Angiome Plan de membrE inférieur), from children aged 2-12 years old with CMs of the lower limbs. Clinical characteristics were prospectively collected. Haemodynamic factors were measured by an sonographer who calculated the arterial blood flow (ABF) in both lower limbs. An ABF difference ≥ 50% between the two lower limbs was considered relevant. LLD ≥ 2% was determined by the same radiologist on centralized radiographs. RESULTS: We analysed data at baseline for 96 children. The mean ± SD age was 5·6 ± 3·1 years; 49 (51%) were male; and 14 (15%) showed LLD. In total, 32 patients (33%) had venous anomalies, 13 (14%) lymphatic anomalies and in one child a diagnosis of Parkes Weber syndrome was made. Only an increased circumference above the knee was more frequent with than without LLD (43% vs. 13%, P = 0·02). In all, 10/79 patients (13%) showed a difference in ABF ≥ 50%: four had LLD. The frequency of differences in ABF ≥ 50% was greater with than without LLD [33% (n = 4/12) vs. 9% (n = 6/67), P = 0·04]. CONCLUSIONS: ABF measured by Duplex ultrasonography is a simple, low-cost and noninvasive complementary examination for help in detecting LLD, with a difference of ≥ 50% possibly associated.

Factors associated with the choice of the first biologic in psoriasis: real-life analysis from the Psobioteq cohort.

BACKGROUND: Decision-making is a complex process. The aim of our study was to assess factors associated with the choice of the first biological treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. METHODS: Data on all patients included in the French prospective, observational, cohort, Psobioteq and initiating a first biologic prescription between July 2012 and July 2016 were analysed. Demographic information and clinical features were collected during routine clinical assessments by the dermatology team at the recruiting centres using a standardized case report form. The primary outcome was the nature of the first biologic treatment. Four groups were identified as follows: adalimumab, etanercept, ustekinumab and infliximab groups. Factors associated with the choice of the first biological agent were determined by a multinomial logistic regression model adjusted on year of inclusion. RESULTS: The study population included the 830 biological-naïve patients who initiated a first biological agent. The mean age was 46.6 years (±SD 13.9), and 318 patients (38.3%) were female. The most commonly prescribed biologic was adalimumab: 355 (42.8%) patients, then etanercept (n = 247, 29.8%), ustekinumab (n = 194, 23.4%) and infliximab (n = 34, 4.0%). In the multinomial logistic regression analysis, patients were significantly more likely to receive adalimumab if they had a severe psoriasis as defined by baseline PASI or if they had psoriatic arthritis compared to etanercept (aOR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.16-1.07) and ustekinumab (aOR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.04-0.52). Patients were significantly more likely to receive ustekinumab (aOR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.04-5.50) if they had a positive screening for latent tuberculosis compared to adalimumab. Younger patients were also more likely to receive ustekinumab. Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were more likely to be prescribed ustekinumab or etanercept compared to adalimumab. There was a trend in favour of etanercept prescription in patients with cardiovascular comorbidities, metabolic syndrome and in patients with a history of cancer. CONCLUSION: We identified patient- and disease-related factors that have important influence on the choice of the first biological agent in clinical practice. Clinicians appear to have a holistic approach to patient characteristics when choosing a biological agent in psoriasis.

[Psoriatic patients: Analysis of patients dissatisfied with their management]. / Patients atteints de psoriasis : analyse de la population insatisfaite de sa prise en charge.

BACKGROUND: The French are frequently regarded as grouchy. In a recent study, we observed a high proportion of patients initially consulting for psoriasis because they were dissatisfied with their previous therapy. We analyzed the characteristics of these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional multicenter study in 40 centers belonging to the ResoPso (psoriasis treatment network) multicenter study group, with consecutive inclusions over a period of 11months in 2014. All adults (age>18 years) consulting for the first time for psoriasis at a center were included in the study. RESULTS: Among patients, 1205 were included, of whom 249 (20.3%) were consulting because of their dissatisfaction with treatment. In the univariate analysis, these patients were younger (P=0.02) and presented psoriasis that had begun earlier in life (P<0.0001). It consisted mostly of generalized plaque psoriasis (P=0.047) and more severe forms of psoriasis (PASI and/or DLQI score>10, P<0.02). There were fewer cases of psoriatic arthritis (P=0.01). The "dissatisfied" patients reported significantly more frequent use of topical treatments (P<0.0001) and alternative medicines (P=0.02), and more infrequent use of biologics (P=0.006) as well as longer treatment periods (P=0.0005). They consulted at hospitals (P=0.01) and had previously seen more GPs and dermatologists (P≤0.0008). There was no impact of gender on the dissatisfaction profile by either comorbidities (metabolic, blood pressure, alcohol and tobacco consumption, and depression), or socio-economic data. In the multivariate analysis, DLQI>10 (P=0.01; 95% CI: 1.01-1.07) and longer duration of care (P=0.004; 95% CI: 1.23-2.99) were associated with dissatisfaction. CONCLUSION: Twenty percent of our psoriatic patients seem dissatisfied with their treatment. It is difficult to draw a specific demographic and socioeconomic profile of dissatisfied patients. Only disease severity and possibly inadequate treatment at the initial consultation are associated with patient dissatisfaction. Explanations related to the individual patients and doctors may be proposed. Finally, while the French may be considered grouchy, the frequency of patient dissatisfaction seen in our study does not appear to be any greater than that observed in other countries.