Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of deep learning automatic segmentations of corneal endothelial cell images of reduced image quality obtained following cornea transplant.

We are developing automated analysis of corneal-endothelial-cell-layer, specular microscopic images so as to determine quantitative biomarkers indicative of corneal health following corneal transplantation. Especially on these images of varying quality, commercial automated image analysis systems can give inaccurate results, and manual methods are very labor intensive. We have developed a method to automatically segment endothelial cells with a process that included image flattening, U-Net deep learning, and postprocessing to create individual cell segmentations. We used 130 corneal endothelial cell images following one type of corneal transplantation (Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty) with expert-reader annotated cell borders. We obtained very good pixelwise segmentation performance (e.g., Dice coefficient = 0.87 ± 0.17 , Jaccard index = 0.80 ± 0.18 , across 10 folds). The automated method segmented cells left unmarked by analysts and sometimes segmented cells differently than analysts (e.g., one cell was split or two cells were merged). A clinically informative visual analysis of the held-out test set showed that 92% of cells within manually labeled regions were acceptably segmented and that, as compared to manual segmentation, automation added 21% more correctly segmented cells. We speculate that automation could reduce 15 to 30 min of manual segmentation to 3 to 5 min of manual review and editing.

Machine learning for segmenting cells in corneal endothelium images.

Images of the endothelial cell layer of the cornea can be used to evaluate corneal health. Quantitative biomarkers extracted from these images such as cell density, coefficient of variation of cell area, and cell hexagonality are commonly used to evaluate the status of the endothelium. Currently, fully-automated endothelial image analysis systems in use often give inaccurate results, while semi-automated methods, requiring trained image analysis readers to identify cells manually, are both challenging and time-consuming. We are investigating two deep learning methods to automatically segment cells in such images. We compare the performance of two deep neural networks, namely U-Net and SegNet. To train and test the classifiers, a dataset of 130 images was collected, with expert reader annotated cell borders in each image. We applied standard training and testing techniques to evaluate pixel-wise segmentation performance, and report corresponding metrics such as the Dice and Jaccard coefficients. Visual evaluation of results showed that most pixel-wise errors in the U-Net were rather non-consequential. Results from the U-Net approach are being applied to create endothelial cell segmentations and quantify important morphological measurements for evaluating cornea health.

Cornea preservation time study: methods and potential impact on the cornea donor pool in the United States.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe the aims, methods, donor and recipient cohort characteristics, and potential impact of the Cornea Preservation Time Study (CPTS). METHODS: The CPTS is a randomized clinical trial conducted at 40 clinical sites (70 surgeons) designed to assess the effect of donor cornea preservation time (PT) on graft survival 3 years after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). Eyes undergoing surgery for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy or pseudophakic/aphakic corneal edema were randomized to receive donor corneas stored ≤7 days or 8 to 14 days. Donor and patient characteristics, tissue preparation and surgical parameters, recipient and donor corneal stroma clarity, central corneal thickness, intraocular pressure, complications, and a reading center-determined central endothelial cell density were collected. Surveys were conducted to evaluate pre-CPTS PT practices. RESULTS: The 1330 CPTS donors were: 49% >60 years old, 27% diabetic, had a median eye bank-determined screening endothelial cell density of 2688 cells/mm, and 74% eye bank prepared for DSAEK. A total of 1090 recipients (1330 eyes including 240 bilateral cases) had: median age of 70 years, were 60% female, 90% white, 18% diabetic, 52% phakic, and 94% had Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy. Before the CPTS, 19 eye banks provided PT data on 20,852 corneas domestically placed for DSAEK in 2010 to 2011; 96% were preserved ≤7 days. Of 305 American Academy of Ophthalmology members responding to a pre-CPTS survey, 233 (76%) set their maximum PT preference at 8 days or less. CONCLUSIONS: The CPTS will increase understanding of factors related to DSAEK success and, if noninferiority of longer PT is shown, will have great potential to extend the available pool of endothelial keratoplasty donors.Clinical Trial Registration-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01537393.

The effect of donor diabetes history on graft failure and endothelial cell density 10 years after penetrating keratoplasty.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the long-term effect of donor diabetes history on graft failure and endothelial cell density (ECD) after penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in the Cornea Donor Study. DESIGN: Multicenter, prospective, double-masked, controlled clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand ninety subjects undergoing PK for a moderate risk condition, principally Fuchs' dystrophy or pseudophakic or aphakic corneal edema, were enrolled by 105 surgeons from 80 clinical sites in the United States. METHODS: Corneas from donors 12 to 75 years of age were assigned by 43 eye banks to participants without respect to recipient factors. Donor and recipient diabetes status was determined from existing medical records. Images of the central endothelium were obtained before surgery (baseline) and at intervals for 10 years after surgery and were analyzed by a central image analysis reading center to determine ECD. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time to graft failure (regraft or cloudy cornea for 3 consecutive months) and ECD. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant association of donor diabetes history with 10-year graft failure, baseline ECD, 10-year ECD, or ECD values longitudinally over time in unadjusted analyses, nor after adjusting for donor age and other significant covariates. The 10-year graft failure rate was 23% in the 199 patients receiving a cornea from a donor with diabetes versus 26% in the 891 patients receiving a cornea from a donor without diabetes (95% confidence interval for the difference, -10% to 6%; unadjusted P=0.60). Baseline ECD (P=0.71), 10-year ECD (P>0.99), and changes in ECD over 10 years (P=0.86) were similar comparing donor groups with and without diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: The study results do not suggest an association between donor diabetes and PK outcome. However, the assessment of donor diabetes was imprecise and based on historical data only. The increasing frequency of diabetes in the aging population in the United States affects the donor pool. Thus, the impact of donor diabetes on long-term endothelial health after PK or endothelial keratoplasty, or both, warrants further study with more precise measures of diabetes and its complications.

Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: three-year graft and endothelial cell survival compared with penetrating keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: To assess 3-year outcomes of Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in comparison with penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) from the Cornea Donor Study (CDS). DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 173 subjects undergoing DSAEK for a moderate risk condition (principally Fuchs' dystrophy or pseudophakic corneal edema) compared with 1101 subjects undergoing PKP from the CDS. METHODS: The DSAEK procedures were performed by 2 experienced surgeons using the same donor and similar recipient criteria as for the CDS PKP procedures, performed by 68 surgeons. Graft success was assessed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Central endothelial cell density (ECD) was determined from baseline donor and postoperative central endothelial images by the reading center used in the CDS Specular Microscopy Ancillary Study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Graft clarity and ECD. RESULTS: The donor and recipient demographics were comparable in the DSAEK and PKP groups, except that the proportion of Fuchs' dystrophy cases was higher in the DSAEK cohort. The 3-year survival rate did not differ significantly between DSAEK and PKP procedures performed for either Fuchs' dystrophy (96% for both; P = 0.81) or non-Fuchs' cases (86% vs. 84%, respectively; P = 0.41). Principal causes of graft failure or regraft within 3 years after DSAEK and PKP were immunologic graft rejection (0.6% vs. 3.1%), endothelial decompensation in the absence of documented rejection (1.7% vs 2.1%), unsatisfactory visual or refractive outcome (1.7% vs. 0.5%), and infection (0% vs. 1.1%), respectively. The 3-year predicted probability of a rejection episode was 9% with DSAEK versus 20% with PKP (P = 0.0005). The median 3-year cell loss for DSAEK and PKP was 46% and 51%, respectively (P = 0.33), in Fuchs' dystrophy cases and 59% and 61%, respectively (P = 0.70), in the non-Fuchs' cases. At 3 years, use of a smaller DSAEK insertion incision was associated with significantly higher cell loss (60% vs. 33% for 3.2- and 5.0-mm incisions, respectively; P = 0.0007), but not with a significant difference in graft survival (P = 0.45). CONCLUSIONS: The graft success rate and endothelial cell loss were comparable at 3 years for DSAEK and PKP procedures. A 5-mm DSAEK incision width was associated with significantly less cell loss than a 3.2-mm incision.

Effect of incision width on graft survival and endothelial cell loss after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of incision width (5.0 and 3.2 mm) on graft survival and endothelial cell loss 6 months and 1 year after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). METHODS: One hundred sixty-seven subjects with endothelial decompensation from a moderate-risk condition (principally Fuchs dystrophy or pseudophakic corneal edema) underwent DSAEK by 2 experienced surgeons. The donor was folded over and inserted with single-point fixation forceps. This retrospective analysis assessed graft survival, complications, and endothelial cell loss, which was calculated from baseline donor and 6-month and 1-year postoperative central endothelial images evaluated by an independent specular microscopy reading center. RESULTS: No primary graft failures occurred in either group. One-year graft survival rates were comparable (98% vs 97%) in the 5.0- and 3.2-mm groups, respectively (P = 1.0). Complications included graft dislocation, graft rejection episodes, and elevated intraocular pressure and occurred at similar rates in both groups (P > or = 0.28). Pupillary block glaucoma did not occur in either group. Mean baseline donor endothelial cell density did not differ: 2782 cells per square millimeter in the 5.0-mm (n = 64) and 2784 cells per square millimeter in the 3.2-mm (n = 103) groups. Percent endothelial cell loss was 27% +/- 20% (n = 55) versus 40% +/- 22% (n = 71; 6 months) and 31% +/- 19% (n = 45) versus 44% +/- 22% (n = 62; 12 months) in the 5.0- and 3.2-mm incision groups, respectively (both P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: One year after DSAEK, overall graft success was comparable for the 2 groups; however, the 5.0-mm incision width resulted in substantially lower endothelial cell loss at 6 and 12 months.

Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty outcomes compared with penetrating keratoplasty from the Cornea Donor Study.

PURPOSE: To assess outcomes 1 year after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in comparison with penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) from the Specular Microscopy Ancillary Study (SMAS) of the Cornea Donor Study. DESIGN: Multicenter, prospective, nonrandomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 173 subjects undergoing DSAEK for a moderate risk condition (principally Fuchs' dystrophy or pseudophakic/aphakic corneal edema) compared with 410 subjects undergoing PKP from the SMAS who had clear grafts with at least 1 postoperative specular image within a 15-month follow-up period. METHODS: The DSAEK procedures were performed by 2 experienced surgeons per their individual techniques, using the same donor and similar recipient criteria as for the PKP procedures in the SMAS performed by 68 surgeons at 45 sites, with donors provided from 31 eye banks. Graft success and complications for the DSAEK group were assessed and compared with the SMAS group. Endothelial cell density (ECD) was determined from baseline donor, 6-month (range, 5-7 months), and 12-month (range, 9-15 months) postoperative central endothelial images by the same reading center used in the SMAS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Endothelial cell density and graft survival at 1 year. RESULTS: Although the DSAEK recipient group criteria were similar to the PKP group, Fuchs' dystrophy was more prevalent in the DSAEK group (85% vs. 64%) and pseudophakic corneal edema was less prevalent (13% vs. 32%, P<0.001). The regraft rate within 15 months was 2.3% (DSAEK group) and 1.3% (PKP group) (P = 0.50). Percent endothelial cell loss was 34+/-22% versus 11+/-20% (6 months) and 38+/-22% versus 20+/-23% (12 months) in the DSAEK and PKP groups, respectively (both P<0.001). Preoperative diagnosis affected endothelial cell loss over time; in the PKP group, the subjects with pseudophakic/aphakic corneal edema experienced significantly higher 12-month cell loss than the subjects with Fuchs' dystrophy (28% vs. 16%, P = 0.01), whereas in the DSAEK group, the 12-month cell loss was comparable for the 2 diagnoses (41% vs. 37%, P = 0.59). CONCLUSIONS: One year post-transplantation, overall graft success was comparable for DSAEK and PKP procedures and endothelial cell loss was higher with DSAEK.