Predictors of Autogenous Arteriovenous Hemodialysis Access Thrombosis after Renal Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The fate of autogenous arteriovenous fistula (aAVF) after renal transplantation (RT) remains variable. The aim of this study was to determine the predictors for their thrombosis after RT. METHODS: We conducted a monocentric retrospective review of prospective clinical records of 145 patients with a functional aAVF who had an RT between January 2004 and December 2009 in the University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand. Our primary end point was the thrombosis of the aAVF. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were used to identify risk factors associated to aAVF thrombosis after RT. RESULTS: There were 105 men (72%) and 40 women (28%), mean age 52 years (range: 18.4-74.7 years). The aAVF was created on average 40 months (range: 2-169) before the RT. The aAVF was distal in 96 cases (66%) and proximal in 49 cases (34%). Nineteen aAVF (13.1%) were complicated and required an endovascular or surgical repair before RT. Forty-nine patients (34%) required multiple aAVF (>2). Mean follow-up from RT was 58 months (range: 1 day-123 months) and from aAVF creation 97 months (range: 5-262 months). At the end of the follow-up, 81 aAVFs (59%) were patent, 42 (29%) were thrombosed, and 22 (15%) were surgically closed. Patients that had multiple fistulas before RT and active smokers were significantly at risk to thrombose their aAVF after the RT in univariate (P = 0.03 and P = 0.02, respectively) and multiple logistic regression analyses (P = 0.03 and P = 0.047, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Thrombosis is a part of the natural history of the aAVF after RT. A history of multiple aAVF creations before RT and active smoking were associated to significant increased risk for fistula thrombosis. Because hemodialysis may be needed after RT, the aAVF patency should be preserved, excepted when the aAVF resulted in complications. Follow-up of the aAVF after RT is important to detect and treat complications before thrombosis occurs.

Eversion carotid endarterectomy without shunt: concerning 1385 consecutive cases.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the perioperative results of eversion carotid endarterectomy (e-CEA) without shunt at 30 days. METHODS: From January 2004 to December 2013, 1385 e-CEAs were performed in 981 men and 404 women, for 268 hemispheric, 55 ocular and 12 oculopyramidal symptoms of carotid stenosis. The average age was 71.1 years. The contralateral internal carotid artery (ICA) was occluded in 77 cases. All e-CEAs were performed using Vanmaele technique, with blood pressure monitoring and under general anesthesia except in two cases (locoregional anesthesia alone). The need for application of an intra-arterial shunt was evaluated using visual quantification of adequate retrograde ICA pressure based on the quality of back-bleeding from the ICA. If well pulsatile, a shunt was not required. Otherwise, the systolic blood pressure was increased until a good quality ICA back-flow was obtained. RESULTS: Freedom from intra-arterial shunt placement was 100% as a result of estimation and augmentation of arterial perfusion to demonstrate pulsatile perfusion by retrograde ICA filling. A peroperative angiography was performed in 910 cases. All surgical sites were evaluated postoperatively by Duplex imaging. The overall stroke and death rate was 1.3%. Nine (0.7%) patients died perioperatively. The 24 (1.7%) non-fatal neurologic events were ipsilateral: 6 (0.4%) disabling and 9 (0.6%) regressive stroke, 3 (0.2%) permanent and 1 (0.1%) transient ocular ischemia, and 5 (0.4%) transient ischemic attacks. Three (0.2%) patients had a perioperative myocardial infarction. Eleven compressive neck hematomas (0.8%) were reoperated in emergency. CONCLUSIONS: E-CEA can be performed safely, as a routine technique, based on the surgeon's evaluation of arterial back-bleeding and an increase in ipsilateral arterial perfusion with standard anesthetic procedures. Also e-CEA may be considered a cost effective method of reducing the frequency of intra-arterial shunt placement and adjuncts used to assess adequate cerebral perfusion of the ipsilateral carotid artery during e-CEA.

Outcomes of the Endovascular Treatment for the Supra-Aortic Trunks Occlusive Disease: A 14-Year Monocentric Experience.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular treatment of proximal supra-aortic trunks (SAT) has become a safe and reliable alternative to conventional open surgery, with a lower morbimortality rate and good short- and middle-term patency rates. The aim of our study was to assess the long-term results of endovascular treatment of proximal lesions of the SAT (brachiocephalic trunk, common carotid artery, and subclavian artery) and identify predictive risk factors of restenosis. METHODS: From 1999 to 2013, 67 consecutive stenotic lesions of the proximal SAT were treated by angioplasty (13.4%) or stenting (86.6%) in 63 patients with a mean age of 65.5 years (40-87). Procedures were performed under general (69%), local (24%), or locoregional (7%) anesthesia, with percutaneous puncture (47.8%) or open access (52.2%). Patients were followed up for 3, 6, and 12 months, and then every year with clinical examination, Doppler ultrasound and if required an angio-CT scan. RESULTS: The technical success rate was 98.5%. There was no postoperative death or strokes. One myocardial infarction occurred at day 2. There were 2 access complications: a nonsurgical hematoma after brachial access and a brachial thrombosis postpuncture. The mean follow-up was 4.5 years (2-163 months). The primary- and assisted-patency rates were 90.1%, 86.4%, 77.9% and 93.3%, 91.4%, 82.9% at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively. Eleven restenosis (16.4%) occurred at 28.5 months (3, 0-112, 0) of follow-up. Four of them required an endovascular repair and 3 required a surgical one. The restenosis rate was 17.5% in the stented group on average at 30.2 months of follow-up (range, 3.0-112.0) and 10% in the group of patients with angioplasty alone at 8 months of follow-up, without significant statistically difference (P = 0.9). No predictive risk factor of restenosis was statistically identified. CONCLUSIONS: The endovascular treatment of proximal stenosis of SAT is a safe, reliable, and efficient technique with a low morbidity and mortality. The long-term results are good, but restenosis can occur. Long-term follow-up should be performed to detect and treat restenosis.

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: What About Screening?

The prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in general population is 4-9% with a high mortality rate when ruptured. Therefore, screening programs were developed in many countries to detect small and large AAA in selected patients. Indeed, prevalence of AAA increases in patients over 65 years old with cigarette smoking history. This paper reviews recent literature related to AAA screening focusing on epidemiology, screening tests and evidence based medicine to highlight not only advantages but also disadvantages of screening programs among population.

Does the technique of carotid endarterectomy determine postoperative hypertension?

BACKGROUND: Hypertension (HT) after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a risk factor for postoperative myocardial infarction, stroke, and neck hematoma. We compared the incidence of postoperative HT within the week after eversion CEA (e-CEA) and patch closure CEA (p-CEA). Postoperative HT was defined as a systolic blood pressure (sBP) ≥ 160 mm Hg and/or the need for postoperative vasodilatators. The aim of our study was to determine if the technique of CEA had an effect on postoperative HT. METHODS: Between January 2010 and June 2011, we prospectively reviewed 560 consecutive endarterectomies (340 p-CEAs and 220 e-CEAs) performed in 443 patients under general anesthesia. All had >70% stenoses, 119 were symptomatic, and 441 asymptomatic. We compared preoperative, peroperative, and postoperative sBP and diastolic blood pressure, carotid sinus nerve block, postoperative intravenous and oral antihypertensive medications, neurologic and cardiac complications, and mortality. RESULTS: The e-CEA group had a higher incidence of women (36.4% vs. 21.8%, P = 0.0002) and HT (85.0% vs. 78.2%, P = 0.04). The e-CEAs had a significantly higher incidence of carotid sinus nerve block (93.6% vs. 15.6%, P < 0.0001). The incidence of postoperative HT was not significantly different between the 2 groups (75.9% in the e-CEA group versus 68.5% in the p-CEA group, P = 0.06). The average postoperative sBP between postoperative hour (H) 2 and H12 was significantly higher in the e-CEA group but <160 mm Hg. The sBP dropped between H2 and H6, and this decrease was greater in the p-CEA group (30% vs. 15% in the e-CEA group). The need for postoperative antihypertensive medication was not different between the 2 groups. One independent risk factor of postoperative HT was identified: history of HT. The rate of postoperative complications was not significantly different between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: The e-CEA technique is not a risk factor and does not have an effect on postoperative HT. The postoperative sBP was more stable in this group. Eversion carotid endarterectomy has been considered, in the literature, as a risk factor of postoperative hypertension. We conducted a large prospective and comparative study of the endarterectomy technique by eversion and with conventional patch closure. The primary end point was the blood pressure value and the administration of antihypertensive treatment. Our study shows that postoperative hypertension after carotid endarterectomy is not related to the surgical technique. Changes in blood pressure after carotid endarterectomy by eversion are lower than those observed after conventional endarterectomy with patch closure. This technique prevents the occurrence of possible hypotension occurrence, which can be the cause of perioperative complications.