Impact of anti-insulin antibodies on islet transplantation outcome: data from the GRAGIL Network.

BACKGROUND: In patients with type 1 diabetes, insulin antibodies (IA), altering the pharmacokinetics of circulating insulin, might be associated with high glucose concentration, prolonged hypoglycemia, and higher insulin requirement. The impact of IA on islet transplantation has never been explored. Our aim was to evaluate islet transplantation results at 1 year according to the presence of IA. METHODS: Our work is a retrospective, case-control study, comparing IA-negative and IA-positive patients among the cohort of patients with type 1 diabetes transplanted within the Swiss-French GRAGIL network between 2003 and 2010. RESULTS: Data about IA were available for 17 patients. Before islet transplantation, 10 patients (59%) were screened positive for IA. At 12 months after transplantation, IA-positive patients reached insulin independence less frequently than IA-negative patients (cumulative incidence of insulin independence, 22.2% vs. 71.4%; P=0.02); ß score was ≥7 in 43% of IA-negative patients versus 0% in IA-positive patients (P=0.022). When comparing IA-positive patients with IA-negative patients, insulin dose was 0.15 U/kg (0.10-0.18 U/kg) versus 0.01 U/kg (0-0.09 U/kg) (P=0.2); HbA1c was 6.1% (5.8%-6.3%) versus 6.1% (5.9%-6.8%) (P=0.16); basal C-peptide level was 460 ρmol/L (350-510 ρmol/L) versus 265 ρmol/L (177-405 ρmol/L) (P=0.28); occurrence of hypoglycemia was 12.5% versus 16.5% (P=0.9); and homeostatic model assessment insulin resistance was 1.25 (1-2.4) versus 0.7 (0.52-0.92) (P=0.01). CONCLUSION: After islet transplantation, IA-positive patients achieved insulin independence less frequently, exhibiting lower ß score and higher homeostatic model assessment insulin resistance compared with IA-negative patients. However, in both groups, islet transplantation restored good glycemic control and drastically reduced hypoglycemia and insulin requirements.

Expectations and strategies regarding islet transplantation: metabolic data from the GRAGIL 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Whether islet transplantation should be aimed at restoring insulin independence or providing adequate metabolic control is still debated. The GRAGIL2 trial was designed as a phase 1-2 study where primary outcome was the rate of insulin independence, and secondary outcome was the success rate defined by a composite score based upon basal C-peptide, HbA1c, hypoglycemic events, and exogenous insulin needs. METHODS: C-peptide negative type 1 brittle diabetic patients experiencing severe hypoglycemia were eligible to receive a maximum of two islet preparations totalizing 10,000 IE/kg or more, with a threshold of 5,000 IE/kg for the first infusion, according to the Edmonton protocol, within the Swiss-French GRAGIL multicentric network. A sequential analysis with a triangular test was performed in every five patients after 6- and 12-month follow-up. Maximal inefficiency was set at 40% and minimal efficiency at 66%. RESULTS: From September 2003 to October 2005, 10 patients were included. Median waiting time was 6.7 months (first injection) and 9 weeks (second injection). All but one patient received 11,089+/-505 IE/kg: one received a single graft of 5398 IE/kg. At 6 months, insulin independence and composite success rates were 6 of 10 and 6 of 10, respectively. At 12 months, insulin independence was observed in 3 of 10 patients and success in 5 of 10 patients. CONCLUSION: Based upon our sequential analysis settings, islet transplantation failed to achieve the primary goal, insulin independence, but tended to succeed in reaching the secondary goal, successful metabolic control. Currently it appears to be a successful biological closed-loop glucose control method for brittle diabetes.

Immunomodulation with CTLA4-Ig in islet transplantation.

The need for permanent, nonspecific, and potentially harmful immunosuppression remains a major obstacle for islet transplantation. The response of a type 1 diabetic recipient to an islet graft includes a specific allogenic immune response and the recurrence of autoimmunity. Free or encapsulated in an immunoisolation device, islet cells are exposed to immune aggression, initiated by donor antigen-presenting cells or by indirect, host antigen-presenting cell-mediated antigen presentation. CTLA4-Ig is a genetically engineered fusion protein of human CTLA4 and the IgG 1 Fc region. It prevents T-cell activation by binding to human B7, which costimulates T cells through CD28. Interesting data were reported in experimental islet transplantation, suggesting that CTLA4-Ig may be slightly but significantly beneficial to islet allograft survival, although studies in autoimmune diabetes are scarce. The main limitations include transient and low levels of expression when CTLA4-Ig is delivered locally, a predominant effect on the direct recognition pathway, and the lack of effect on memory cells. Clinical trials in islet transplantation could be discussed in nonuremic patients, with steroid-free and anticalcineurin-free regimens, in combination with another costimulation blocker, rapamycin, and an anti-interleukin 2 receptor antibody, and with a strategy directed against the recurrence of autoimmunity.