Diagnosis of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo in Emergency Department: Our experience.

The Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (BPPV) represents the first cause of peripheral vertigo in populations and it is determined by a displacement of otoconial fragments within the semicircular canals. Following the patient's head movements, these fragments, moving by inertia, incorrectly stimulate the canals generating vertigo. The BPPV is diagnosable by observing the nystagmus that is generated in the patient following the Dix-Hallpike maneuver used for BPPV diagnosis of vertical semi-circular canal, and, following the supine head yaw test used for lateral semi-circular canal. Correctly identifying the origin of this specific peripheral vertigo, would mean to obtain a faster diagnosis and an immediate resolution of the problem for the patient. In this context, this study aims to identify precise training activities, aimed at the application of specific diagnostic maneuverers for algorithm decisions in support of medical personnel. The evaluations reported in this study refer to the data collected in the Emergency Department of the Cardarelli Hospital of Naples. The results obtained, over a six-month observation period, highlighted the advantages of the proposed procedures in terms of costs, time and number of BPPV diagnoses.

Inappropriate left ventricular mass in children and young adults with chronic renal insufficiency.

Increased left ventricular (LV) mass (M) in children with chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) might represent an adaptive mechanism to compensate for increased workload. We hypothesized that in children with CRI, pre-dialysis, values of left ventricular mass (LVM) exceed compensatory values for individual cardiac load. Complete anthropometric characteristics, biochemical profile and echocardiograms were obtained for 33 children with CRI, pre-dialysis (age 1-23 years, mean 12.2 +/- 5.0 years), and 33 age- and gender-matched healthy controls. LV dimensions, wall thicknesses and volume were measured. Endocardial and midwall shortening, ejection fraction, LVM, LVM index, relative wall thickness, circumferential wall stress and excess LVM (as ratio of observed LVM to value predicted from body size, gender and cardiac workload) were analysed. Patients with CRI showed higher values of LVM index, resulting in higher prevalence of LV hypertrophy (36.3% vs 9%, P < 0.05). The ratio of excess LVM was greater in patients with CRI than in healthy controls (126 +/- 19% and 103 +/- 13%, respectively, P < 0.001). LV ejection fraction, midwall fractional shortening and stress-corrected midwall shortening were lower in patients with CRI than in controls. We concluded that, in children with CRI, the values of LVM are higher than those needed to sustain individual cardiac load than in healthy controls, a condition associated with LV hypertrophy and reduced systolic performance.

Myocardial mechano-energetic efficiency in hypertensive adults.

BACKGROUND: Myocardial mechanical efficiency can be measured as the ratio between systolic work and energy consumption. We evaluated the relation between myocardial mechanical efficiency and left ventricular (LV) mass in untreated hypertensive patients. METHODS: Myocardial work was estimated in 256 normotensive (35 +/- 12 years) and 306 hypertensive patients (47 +/- 10 years) with normal ejection fraction, as stroke work in gram-meters (stroke work = BPs x SV x 0.0144, where BPs is systolic blood pressure, SV is echocardiographic stroke volume). Myocardial O2 consumption was estimated as the product of heart rate (HR) x BPs (eMVO2). Myocardial mechanical efficiency was estimated as the ratio of stroke work/eMVO2, which can be simplified and expressed as ml/s. RESULTS: LV mass was greater in hypertensive than in normotensive patients (46 +/- 13 vs. 38 +/- 11 g/m2.7, P < 0.0001), but myocardial mechanical efficiency was identical (85 +/- 23 vs. 86 +/- 26 ml/s). Relations between myocardial mechanical efficiency and LV mass were close (both P < 0.0001), but more scattered among hypertensive patients because of 56 patients exhibiting low myocardial mechanical efficiency relative to the magnitude of LV mass. At comparable age and body size, these patients had higher HR, BPs, and pulse pressure than those with normal myocardial mechanical efficiency (all P < 0.001). After adjusting for age and sex, hypertensive patients with low myocardial mechanical efficiency showed greater relative wall thickness and lower ejection fraction and midwall shortening than those with normal myocardial mechanical efficiency (all P < 0.001). Low myocardial mechanical efficiency was also associated with inappropriately high LV mass (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In some hypertensive patients the left ventricle works inefficiently with a high energy wasting, at the same level of LV mass as hypertensive patients with normal myocardial mechanical efficiency. Those patients feature a high cardiovascular risk phenotype, with concentric LV geometry, systolic dysfunction, and indirect signs of more severe vascular impairment.

Increased left ventricular mass in pre-liver transplantation cirrhotic patients.

OBJECTIVE: Severe liver disease is associated with abnormalities in cardiac geometry and function. We aimed to assess the prevalence of these abnormalities and to determine if they represent an adaptation of the heart to the haemodynamic overload associated with liver dysfunction. METHODS: Seventy cirrhotic patients underwent standard Doppler echocardiography, as a screening evaluation for liver transplantation, and were compared with 70 normal subjects matched for age and sex. The values of echocardiographically measured left ventricular mass (LVM) were compared with those predicted from individual haemodynamic load, sex and height, which represent the compensatory values. LVM was considered inappropriately high when the observed/predicted LVM ratio was >128%. RESULTS: Cirrhotic patients had higher LVM index (40.6 +/- 11.2 vs. 36.3 +/- 7.7 g/m; P = 0.009)), similar values of ejection fraction, but lower intrinsic wall mechanics (P < 0.01) compared to controls. The observed/predicted LVM ratio was also significantly increased (117.7 +/- 30.2 vs. 106.5 +/- 16.8%; P < 0.01) and prevalence of inappropriate LVM was almost three-fold higher in cirrhotic patients (27.7 vs. 10.0%; P < 0.05) than in controls. Cirrhotic patients also presented mild impairment of left ventricular systolic function, documented by lower values of midwall shortening. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe liver disease have LVM values exceeding the compensatory needs to sustain haemodynamic overload, associated with subclinical systolic dysfunction.

Excessive increase in left ventricular mass identifies hypertensive subjects with clustered geometric and functional abnormalities.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular mass (LVM) exceeding needs to sustain haemodynamic load has been termed 'inappropriate left ventricular mass'. We hypothesized that inappropriate LVM identifies hypertensive patients with clustered cardiac geometric and functional abnormalities. METHODS: For this purpose, 359 hypertensive individuals without prevalent cardiovascular disease underwent Doppler echocardiography. Observed LVM exceeding more than 28% of the value predicted for individual cardiac work, body size and sex was defined as inappropriate LVM. Concentric left ventricular geometry was defined as age-adjusted relative wall thickness (RWT) greater than 0.40. Systolic dysfunction was defined as ejection fraction less than 50% or midwall shortening less than 14.7%. Diastolic dysfunction was defined as isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT) greater than 100 ms, E-velocity deceleration time greater than 220 ms or age and heart rate-normalized early/late (E/A) ratio less than 0.66. Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) was defined as an LVM index greater than 49.2 g/m2.7 in men and 46.7 g/m2.7 in women. RESULTS: As expected, inappropriate LVM was associated with higher RWT, lower left ventricular systolic function, longer IVRT and prolonged E-deceleration time (all P < 0.05). Patients with inappropriate LVM had a higher prevalence of concentric geometry (65.5 versus 40.4%), systolic dysfunction (67.9 versus 47.4%) and diastolic dysfunction (46.4 versus 39%; all P < 0.001) than those with LVH. Inappropriate LVM had greater sensitivity (0.89 versus 0.54) and specificity (0.82 versus 0.62; both P < 0.01) than LVH in identifying patients with clustered left ventricular concentric geometry, systolic and diastolic dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Inappropriate LVM is associated with a cluster of concentric left ventricular geometry, delayed left ventricular relaxation and reduced systolic performance. Compared with LVH, inappropriate LVM is more accurate at identifying patients with clustered left ventricular geometric and functional abnormalities.