Treatment Sequencing and Outcome of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients Treated at Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS: A Thirty-Year Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: This monocentric retrospective study describes the treatment patterns and outcomes of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients. METHODS: Adult CLL patients treated between 1992 and 2022 were included. The time to next treatment (TTNT) was defined as the time from the treatment's start to the start of a subsequent therapy or death. The time to next treatment failure or death (TTNTF) was defined as the time from treatment discontinuation to the discontinuation of a subsequent therapy or death. RESULTS: Of 637 registered patients, 318 (49.9%) received treatment. We evaluated 157 cBTKi-exposed, 34 BCL2i-exposed cBTKi-naïve, and 26 double-exposed patients. The five-year TTNT values in the cBTKi-exposed patients were 80% (median NR), 40% (median 40 months), and 21% (median 24 months) months in the first line (1L), second line (2L), and beyond the second line (>2L), respectively (p < 0.0001). The five-year TTNT values in the BCL2i-exposed patients were 83% (median NR), 72% (median NR), 12% (median 28 months) in the 1L, 2L, and >2L, respectively (p = 0.185). The median TTNTF was 9 months (range 1-87) after cBTKi and 17 months (range 8-49) after both a cBTKi and BCL2i. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that, in CLL patients, the earlier we used targeted therapies, the better was the outcome obtained. Nonetheless, the poor outcomes in the advanced lines of therapy highlight the need for more effective treatments.

Measurable residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Measurable residual disease (MRD) is defined as the presence of residual cancer cells after treatment in patients with clinically undetectable disease, who would otherwise be considered in complete remission. It is a highly sensitive parameter which indicates the disease burden and predicts survival in this setting of patients. In recent years, MRD has gained a role in many hematological malignancies as a surrogate endpoint for clinical trials: undetectable MRD has been correlated to longer progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). New drugs and combinations have been developed with the aim to achieve MRD negativity, which would indicate favorable prognosis. Different methods to measure MRD have also been devised, which include flow cytometry, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and next generation sequencing (NGS), with different sensitivity and accuracy in evaluating deep remission after treatment. In this review, we will analyze the current recommendations for the detection of MRD, with particular focus on its role in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL), as well as the different detection methods. Moreover, we will discuss the results of clinical trials and the role of MRD in new therapeutic schemes with inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies. MRD is not currently used in the clinical practice to evaluate response to treatment, due to technical and economical limitations, but it's gaining more and more interest in trials settings, especially since the introduction of venetoclax. The use of MRD in trials will likely be followed by a broader practical application in the future. The aim of this work is to provide a reader-friendly summary of the state of art in the field, as MRD will soon become an accessible tool to evaluate our patients, predict their survival and guide physician's therapeutic choices and preferences.

Richter transformation in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia can evolve to an aggressive lymphoma-in most of the cases diffuse large B cells lymphoma, rarely Hodgkin lymphoma-and this complication is defined Richter syndrome (RS). Immunogenotypic features that characterize RS include unmutated IgHV status with high prevalence of IgHV4-39/D6-13/J5 sequence; deletion of chromosome 17p or 11q; activation of oncogenes as NOTCH1 and c-MYC; inactivation of onco-suppressors as TP53 and CDKN2A; high expression of CD38 in lymph-nodes. The prognosis of this condition is very poor: patients experience a rapid clinical deterioration with frequent therapeutic failure since the current options include suboptimal strategies as standard chemo-immunotherapy followed by hematopoietic stem cells transplantation or enrollment in clinical trials which investigate the efficacy of target drugs. Understanding the biology of such a heterogeneous condition is crucial to personalize the treatment and improve patient's survival.

Subcutaneous immunoglobulins in chronic lymphocytic leukemia with secondary antibody deficiency. A monocentric experience during Covid-19 pandemics.

Secondary antibody deficiency (SAD) is a frequent manifestation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) that increases the risk of infections. However, no formal guideline are available regarding the eligibility for prophylaxis or the delivery method, dosage, frequency of administration and duration of immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT). The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous IgRT (SCIg) and its impact on quality of life (QoL) of CLL pts in the Covid-19 era. Ten CLL pts with SAD were treated with subcutaneous IgRT (SCIg) at our institution between October 2019 and December 2020. Median age was 66 years and five patients had comorbidities. Seven patients were receiving therapy for CLL when treatment with SCIg was initiated. All pts received 10 g total dose hyaluronidase-free SCIg independently from body weight. The IgG level and CD4/CD8, CD19 and CD16/56 lymphocytes subset were recorded at baseline and every 3 months. No patient experienced infectious events nor Covid-19 mediated interstitial pneumonia while on SCIg therapy. All patients tolerated well the therapy and experienced an increase of IgG levels, which was then stable in time. We conclude that SCIg administration in CLL pts with SAD is efficacious and safe as infectious prophylaxis. This route of administration appears particularly advantageous in the Covid-19 era, because of the self-administration at home which results in improvement in the QoL and reduced treatment expenditures.

Bone marrow transplantation for acquired aplastic anemia: What's new.

Bone marrow transplantation is a major therapeutic option for patients with acquired severe aplastic anaemia: improved survival has been achieved in younger patients, thanks to better donor selection, conditioning regimens and graft versus host disease prophylaxis, together with improved supportive care, including diagnosis and treatment of opportunistic infections. This has not been the case for older patients over the age of 40 years. We will discuss transplantation platforms as used for different donor types and we will analyse major breakthroughs of the last years: the combination of Fludarabine and cyclophosphamide as a conditioning regimen, the use of alternative donors including HLA haploidentical related donors and new strategies to prevent acute and chronic graft versus host disease, including post transplantation Cyclophosphamide. These changes extend the option of a bone marrow transplantation for patients who lack an HLA matched donor and appear to improve engraftment and reduce graft versus host disease: whether this will be true for all age groups is currently being investigated.

Allogeneic Hemopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Myelofibrosis: 2021.

The aim of this review is to update the current status of allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT) for patients with myelofibrosis (MF). We have first summarized the issue of an indication for allogeneic HSCT, discussing several prognostic scoring systems, developed to predict the outcome of MF, and therefore to identify patients who will benefit of an allogeneic HSCT. Patients with low risk MF are usually not selected for a transplant, whereas patients with intermediate or high risk MF are eligible. A separate issue, is how to predict the outcome of HSCT: we will outline a clinical molecular myelofibrosis transplant scoring system (MTSS), which predicts overall survival, ranging from 90% for low risk patients, to 20% for very high risk patients. We will also discuss transfusion burden and spleen size, as predictors of transplant outcome. The choice of a transplant platform including the conditioning regimen, the stem cell source and GvHD prophylaxis, are crucial for a successful program in MF, and will be outlined. Complications such as poor graft function, graft failure, GvHD and relapse of the disease, will also be reviewed. Finally we discuss monitoring the disease after HSCT with donor chimerism, driver mutations and hematologic data. We have made an effort to make this review as comprehensive and up to date as possible, and we hope it will provide some useful data for the clinicians.