ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To explore the feasibility of the usage of digital guides in combination with low- and high-power lasers for the treatment of excessive gingival display, also known as "gummy smile". CLINICAL CONSIDERATIONS: Excessive gingival display due to altered passive eruption can affect patient's perception of their own esthetics and consequently have an impact on self-confidence. Therefore, the management of this condition should offer a predictable and stable long-lasting solution. To attain these objectives, digital planning emerges as a tool in optimizing the outcomes of crown lengthening surgery for this condition by enhancing precision through the use of surgical guides. Additionally, the usage of high- and low-powered lasers can provide a safe approach because of their tissue selective removal properties. CONCLUSIONS: The technique described showed satisfactory clinical results in the short- and long-term follow-up, leading to an improvement in patients' self-esteem. This approach integrates digital and laser technologies to deliver a surgical treatment characterized by precision, efficiency, and safety. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Digital dentistry has contributed to innovative dental procedures, as personalizing surgical guides for patients, assisting and guiding incisions of the gingival margins, as well as the extension of the osteotomy, during the procedures for increasing the clinical crown. Furthermore, smile esthetics are directly related to an individual's improved emotional and social quality of life.
Subject(s)
Gingivectomy , Lasers, Solid-State , Humans , Gingivectomy/methods , Crown Lengthening/methods , Lasers, Solid-State/therapeutic use , Follow-Up Studies , Quality of Life , Esthetics, Dental , CrownsABSTRACT
Background: Symptomatic patients with COVID-19 typically have a high SARS-CoV-2 viral load in their saliva. Procedures to reduce the viral load in their oral cavity are important for mitigating the viral transmission. Methods: This randomized clinical trial investigated the impact of two mouthwashes (0.075% cetylpyridinium chloride plus 0.28% zinc lactate (CPC+Zn) (n = 32), and 0.075% cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) (n = 31)) on the viral load of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva when compared to the distilled water negative control (n = 32). Saliva was collected before (T0) and after (5 min, T1; 30 min, T2; and 60 min, T3) the intervention. Viral load in saliva was measured by qRT-PCR assays. The data in both groups was normalized for T0 and Negative Control, resulting in fold change values. Results: CPC+Zn oral solution reduced the viral load in saliva by 6.34-fold at T1, 3.6-fold at T2 and 1.9-fold at T3. Rinsing with the CPC mouthwash reduced the viral load in saliva by 2.5-fold at T1, 1.9-fold at T2 and 2.0-fold at T3. Conclusion: CPC+Zn mouthwash or with the CPC mouthwash reduced the viral load in saliva of COVID-19 patients immediately after rinsing. These reductions extended up to 60 min.
Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents, Local , COVID-19 , Humans , Cetylpyridinium , Mouthwashes , Saliva , SARS-CoV-2 , Viral LoadABSTRACT
Abstract Plaque-induced gingivitis is the most common form of periodontal disease and can affect 100% of the population. Gingivitis prevalence in Latin American population is not well documented, therefore the aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and severity of plaque-induced gingivitis in adult populations of three Latin American cities. Methods: This cross sectional multicenter study included 1650 participants, 550 from the Great Metropolitan Area of Costa Rica (GAM), 550 from Mexico City, Mexico (CDMX) and 550 from Bogota City, Colombia (BC). Subjects completed a questionnaire about their medical history and oral hygiene. Clinical assessment included recording of missing teeth, visible plaque index, calculus recording and gingival index (GI, Loe-Silness index). Results: Average GI was 1.36. No statistical difference was found between GAM (1.45) and BC (1.48); however, GI in CDMX was significantly lower (1.16). Average gingival bleeding on probing was 43%. Total plaque index was 0.76 showing the highest accumulation at interproximal sites (p=0.0001). A positive correlation was found between plaque and gingivitis (r=0.59). Dental calculus was present in at least one of the 18 evaluated sites per subject with no statistical difference between cities. There was no statistical difference in GI between smokers, former smokers and non- smokers. Conclusion: Gingivitis prevalence was 99.6%. Moderate Gingivitis was the predominant form, with no statistically significant difference between cities or gender. Dental plaque accumulation was the most important risk factor associated with the establishment of the disease.
Resumen La gingivitis inducida por placa es la forma más común de enfermedad periodontal y puede afectar al 100% de la población. La prevalencia de gingivitis en Latinoamerica no está bien documentada, por lo tanto, el objetivo de este estudio fue determinar la prevalencia y severidad de la gingivitis inducida por placa en poblaciones adultas de tres ciudades latinamericanas. Metodología: Este estudio transversal multicéntrico incluyó 1650 sujetos, 550 del Gran Área Metropolitana de Costa Rica (GAM), 550 de la Ciudad de México, México (CDMX) y 550 de la Ciudad de Bogotá, Colombia (BC). Los sujetos completaron un cuestionario sobre su historia médica y hábitos de higiene oral. El examen clínico incluyó el registro de piezas dentales ausentes, el índice de placa visible, el registro de cálculo y el índice gingival (GI, Índice de Silness y Loe). Resultados: El GI promedio fue de 1.36. No se encontró diferencia estadísticamente significativa entre GAM (1.45) y BC (1.48); sin embargo, el índice gingival en CDMX fue menor (1.16). El promedio de sangrado al sondaje fue de 43%. El índice de placa total fue 0.76, mostrando la mayor acumulación en sitios interproximales (p=0.0001). Se encontró una correlación positiva entre placa y gingivitis (r=0.59). Hubo presencia de cálculo dental en al menos uno de los 18 sitios evaluados por cada sujeto sin diferencia estadística entre ciudades. No se encontró diferencia estadísticamente significativa en cuanto al índice gingival entre fumadores, ex fumadores y no fumadores. Conclusión: La prevalencia de Gingivitis fue del 99.6%. La Gingivitis Moderada fue la forma predominante, sin diferencia estadísticamente significativa por ciudad o sexo. La acumulación de placa fue el principal factor de riesgo asociado con el establecimiento de la enfermedad.