Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Front Public Health ; 11: 1211520, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37601207

ABSTRACT

Objective: Visible minorities are disproportionately affected by musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) and other diseases; yet are largely underrepresented in health research. The purpose of this scoping review was to identify barriers and strategies associated with increasing recruitment of visible minorities in MSD research. Methods: Electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycInfo) were searched. Search strategies used terms related to the concepts of 'race/ethnicity', 'participation', 'research' and 'musculoskeletal'. All research designs were included. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, completed full-text reviews, and extracted data. Papers that did not focus on musculoskeletal research, include racial minorities, or focus on participation in research were excluded. Study characteristics (study location, design and methods; sample characteristics (size, age, sex and race); MSD of interest) as well as barriers and strategies to increasing participation of visible minorities in MSD research were extracted from each article and summarized in a table format. Results: Of the 4,282 articles identified, 28 met inclusion criteria and were included. The majority were conducted in the United States (27 articles). Of the included studies, the groups of visible minorities represented were Black (25 articles), Hispanic (14 articles), Asian (6 articles), Indigenous (3 articles), Middle Eastern (1 article), and Multiracial (1 article). The most commonly cited barriers to research participation were mistrust, logistical barriers (e.g., transportation, inaccessible study location, financial constraints), and lack of awareness or understanding of research. Strategies for increasing diversity were ensuring benefit of participants, recruiting through sites serving the community of interest, and addressing logistical barriers. Conclusion: Understanding the importance of diversity in MSD research, collaborating with communities of visible minorities, and addressing logistical barriers may be effective in reducing barriers to the participation of visible minorities in health research. This review presents strategies to aid researchers in increasing inclusion in MSD-related research.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research , Ethnic and Racial Minorities , Minority Groups , Musculoskeletal Diseases , Patient Selection , Humans , Databases, Factual , Ethnicity , Hispanic or Latino , Biomedical Research/organization & administration
2.
Acad Psychiatry ; 33(1): 23-6, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19349438

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The authors examined the effects of medical student assignment to U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center inpatient and outpatient psychiatry clerkship sites versus other university and community sites on the performance outcome measure of National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) subject examination scores. METHODS: NBME psychiatry scores were compared for stratified random samples of 70 students each for inpatient and outpatient VA and non-VA sites, controlling for baseline clinical knowledge as reflected by second year Human Behavior course scores. RESULTS: No significant differences were demonstrated in NBME scores between VA and non-VA sites for either inpatient or outpatient programs. CONCLUSION: Assessed students rotating through several VA clinical sites were as well prepared for NBME subject examinations as those assigned to other sites. Additional measures of educational outcome for VA sites are recommended to assess and enhance clinical education provided by the VA and to strengthen collaboration with university-based medical student teaching programs.


Subject(s)
Academic Medical Centers , Clinical Clerkship/standards , Cooperative Behavior , Hospitals, Veterans , Military Psychiatry/education , Specialty Boards/standards , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Achievement , Curriculum/standards , Humans , United States
6.
Compr Psychiatry ; 47(3): 227-33, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16635653

ABSTRACT

In the treatment of substance use disorders, it is advantageous to identify patients with comorbid (nonsubstance) psychiatric disorders because treating comorbid disorders improves outcome. Because accurate psychiatric diagnosis is time-consuming, there is a need for strategies to screen for these comorbid conditions. This study used receiver operating characteristic analysis to investigate a symptom checklist (revised Symptom Checklist 90 [SCL-90-R]) as a screening instrument for comorbid conditions diagnosed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV in 171 primarily military personnel with alcohol use disorders. Several approaches to applying receiver operating characteristic analysis to this problem are demonstrated. Although these results require replication in other populations, the SCL-90-R performed well in predicting comorbid conditions, with an area under the curve of 0.88 for current and 0.85 for lifetime comorbid diagnoses. Self-report symptom checklists such as the SCL-90-R may be useful in screening substance rehabilitation patients for more detailed psychiatric assessment and may prove clinically useful in the assessment of alcoholic patients.


Subject(s)
Alcoholism/complications , Mental Disorders/complications , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Mass Screening/methods , Middle Aged , Military Personnel , Predictive Value of Tests , ROC Curve , Self-Assessment , Sensitivity and Specificity
7.
J Okla State Med Assoc ; 98(8): 380-4, 2005 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16206866

ABSTRACT

Caffeine can cause or worsen psychiatric symptoms but also has the potential to interact with many psychiatric medications. This article provides a literature review regarding interactions between caffeine and psychiatric medications. Caffeine is metabolized by the CYP1A2 enzyme and also acts as a competitive inhibitor of this enzyme. Thus, caffeine can interact with a wide range of psychiatric medications, including antidepressant agents, antipsychotic agents, antimanic agents, antianxiety agents, and sedative agents. These interactions may lead to caffeine-related or medication-related side effects that may complicate psychiatric treatment. By recognizing this potential, along with educating the patient, and utilizing a tapering approach, prevention of caffeine interactions is achievable.


Subject(s)
Caffeine/adverse effects , Psychotropic Drugs/adverse effects , Anti-Anxiety Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Anxiety Agents/pharmacology , Antidepressive Agents/adverse effects , Antidepressive Agents/pharmacology , Antimanic Agents/adverse effects , Antimanic Agents/pharmacology , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacology , Caffeine/pharmacology , Drug Interactions , Humans , Hypnotics and Sedatives/adverse effects , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology , Medical History Taking , Psychotropic Drugs/pharmacology
8.
J Okla State Med Assoc ; 97(12): 538-42, 2004 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15732884

ABSTRACT

Caffeine is a widely used psychoactive substance that has the potential to contribute to many psychiatric symptoms. This review article aims to address the specific research studies and case reports that relate caffeine to psychiatric symptoms. Caffeine can cause anxiety symptoms in normal individuals, especially in vulnerable patients, like those with pre-existing anxiety disorders. Caffeine use is also associated with symptoms of depression due to either a self-medication theory, or a theory that caffeine itself causes changes in mood. Psychosis can be induced in normal individuals ingesting caffeine at toxic doses, and psychotic symptoms can also be worsened in schizophrenic patients using caffeine. Sleep and symptoms of ADHD may be altered by caffeine as well. Prevention of caffeine-induced psychiatric symptoms is possible by recognizing, educating, and treating patients using a tapering approach.


Subject(s)
Caffeine/adverse effects , Central Nervous System Stimulants/adverse effects , Mental Disorders/chemically induced , Anxiety/chemically induced , Caffeine/pharmacology , Central Nervous System Stimulants/pharmacology , Depression/chemically induced , Humans , Mental Disorders/physiopathology , Mental Disorders/prevention & control , Primary Health Care , Psychoses, Substance-Induced , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...