Prospective Study on Avoiding Seroma Formation by Flap Fixation After Modified Radical Mastectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Seroma development after mastectomy is a common complication. Continued seroma causes increased outpatient visits, repeated aspirations, infection, delayed healing, delayed adjuvant therapy, and increased cost. Various treatments are being attempted to prevent and reduce seroma development. We examined the effects of flap fixation on seroma using absorbable sutures after modified radical mastectomy (MRM). METHODS: The prospectively recorded data of patients who underwent surgery for breast cancer were analyzed retrospectively. 72 consecutive patients who underwent MRM were included in the study. Patients who underwent MRM in the same way by the same surgeon were divided into two groups: the group whose wound was closed by fixing the flap to the chest wall with an absorbable suture (group A), and the group whose wound was closed with the classical method (group B). The groups were compared in terms of seroma development, clinicopathological data, and early complications. RESULTS: Drain removal time and the total amount of drained fluid in group A patients were significantly lower than drain removal time and the total amount of drained fluid in group B patients (P < .001). Similarly, the amount of aspirated seroma in the control examinations of group A patients was significantly lower than that in group B (P < .05). Group B needed re-aspiration significantly more than group A (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Flap fixation with suture after MRM is a method that reduces seroma formation and the amount of drained fluid, enables early removal of the drain, prevents delay in starting adjuvant treatment, is more comfortable for the patient and physician, and is also inexpensive.

Determination of risk factors for conversion from laparoscopic to open appendectomy in patients with acute appendicitis.

BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis is the most common cause of surgical emergencies. It can be difficult to distinguish cases of acute appendicitis that should be managed by laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) from those that should be managed by open surgery. This study aimed to prevent the inappropriate choice of technique and associated complications by identifying potential risk factors for conversion from laparoscopic to open appendectomy (OA) at the time of initial surgical assessment. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent laparoscopic exploration for acute appendicitis. The study included patients over 18 years of age between January 2016 and July 2021. Patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical approach: those who underwent a LA and those who initially underwent laparoscopic exploration first and then converted to OA. Demographics, perioperative factors, and outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS: The study included 634 adults undergoing laparoscopic exploration for an appendectomy. About 80.8% had LA, and 19.2% (n=122) required COA. COA patients' average age was significantly higher than LA patients' (48.5 years vs. 37.8 years, P<0.001). The conversion rate for patients over 65 was 63.8%, compared to 15.6% for those under 65 (P<0.001). COA patients had higher bilirubin levels (36.1% vs. 13.5%, P<0.001), higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores (ASA >2, COA 52.5% vs. LA 7.8%, P<0.001), and a higher need for CT imaging (84.4% vs. 67.6%, P<0.001) than LA patients. An Alvarado score >6 significantly differenti-ated LA from COA (62.6% vs. 39.4%, P< p<0.001). COA patients experienced significantly increased periods until starting oral intake (31.6 vs. 9.9 h, P<0.001) and higher rates of complicated appendicitis (40.9% vs. 0.6%, P<0.001). After surgery, COA had higher rates of complications compared to LA: surgical site infections (8.2% vs. 2.7%, P=0.004), reoperation (13.1% vs. 0%, P<0.001), hospital re-admission (14.7% vs. 2.3%, P<0.001), and mortality (1.6% vs. 0%, P<0.004). CONCLUSION: Advanced age, especially over 65 years, elevated bilirubin levels, an ASA >2 score, and an increased need for pre-operative diagnostics using CT scans were found to be significant predictors of conversion to OA. In the conversion group, operative time, time to oral intake, and the incidence of complicated appendicitis were significantly higher. The conversion group had significantly higher rates of postoperative complications, surgical site infections, hospital readmissions, and mortality. To avoid the increased rate of complications associated with conversion to open surgery, the initial evaluation of a patient with prospective risk factors may be beneficial.

Preoperative ALBI grade predicts mortality in patients undergoing curative surgery for pancreatic head cancer.

The clinical significance of the albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade in patients with pancreatic head cancer (PHC) undergoing surgery is unknown. Preoperative ALBI grade is believed to be influenced by tumor burden. This study aimed to develop and validate the ALBI grade as a preoperative prognostic model for predicting the survival of patients with PHC. This is a retrospective study of Whipple procedures performed on PHC patients between January 2013 and December 2022. ALBI grade was compared to age, gender, type of operation, presence of complications, type of complications, Clavien-Dindo classification, total bilirubin levels, and albumin levels. Of the series, 46 (41.1%) of the 112 patients were female, while 66 (58.9%) were male. The rate of complications following Whipple procedures was 36.6% (n = 41). The overall mortality hazard ratio increased significantly with increasing ALBI grades (HR: 1538, hazard ratio mean: -1602). Hospital mortality increased 2.84 times as the ALBI grade increased. The model's accuracy of 88.4% showed that the ALBI grade directly affected both the overall mortality rate and the hospital rate. But there was no statistically significant difference between the ALBI grade and other variables. Multivariate regression analysis identified the preoperative ALBI grade as an independent predictor of mortality (P = .006). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to identify preoperative ALBI grade as an independent predictor of survival in PHC. It was found that the ALBI grade of -1602 was a new grading system that would be more predictive of mortality in PHC.

Evaluation of complications after laparoscopic and open appendectomy by the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program surgical risk calculator.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the predictive level of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) risk calculator for post-appendectomy complications. METHODS: A total of 292 patients who were hospitalized for general appendectomy were included in the study. The age range of the patients was 18-76 years (mean: 35.3±13.6 years). The mean body mass index was 25.8±4.6. Twenty data points were entered into the ACS-NSQIP surgical risk calculator (SRC), which yielded the 17 most common complications and the average LOHS. Compli-cations encountered in 30-day follow-up were categorized according to the complications predicted by SRC. The actual and observed complication rates and LOHS were compared RESULTS: Post-operative complications developed in 13.4% of the patients, surgical site infection in 11.3%, serious complications in 3.1%, and readmission in 2.1%. Serious complications included pneumonia, sepsis, cardiac complications, and renal failure. The mean LOHS was 1.91±1.64 days (range: 1-14 days). No thromboembolism or mortality was observed. When the comparison of compli-cations using SRC was made with the ROC curve, the predictive value of SRC was 84.2% for any complication, 86.7% for serious complication, 47.6% for surgical site infection, 95.9% for renal failure, 99.0% for resurgery, and 88.3% for sepsis. CONCLUSION: Although it is rare to see complications after simple appendectomy, it is known that complication rates increase sig-nificantly in the elderly, the obese, and those with comorbidities. Tools such as SRC will be beneficial for patients with these risk factors.