Preparation of physiologically active inside-out vesicles from plant inner mitochondrial membranes.

For many metabolites, the major barrier between cytosol and mitochondrial matrix is the inner membrane of mitochondria, the site of the respiratory electron transport chain. In consequence, it houses numerous transporters which facilitate the controlled exchange of metabolites, ions, and even proteins between these cellular compartments. While their import into the organelle can be studied with isolated mitochondria or mitoplasts, the analysis of their export from the matrix into the intermembrane space or even the cytosol demands for more sophisticated approaches. Among those, inside-out inner membrane vesicles are particularly useful, since they allow the direct presentation of the potential export substrates to the membrane without prior import into the organelle. Here we present a protocol for the isolation of such inside-out vesicles of the inner membrane of plant mitochondria based on repeated freeze/thaw-cycles of freshly prepared mitoplasts. Electron microscopy and Western analysis could show that the majority of the vesicles have single envelope membranes in an inside-out topology. The vesicles are furthermore physiologically active, as demonstrated by assays measuring the enzymatic activities of Complex I (NADH dehydrogenase), Complex V (ATP synthase) and the mitochondrial processing peptidase (MPP) associated with Complex III. Hence, the method presented here provides a good basis for further studies of the inner mitochondrial membrane and mitochondrial export processes.

Fluorescent Protein-Based Approaches for Subcellular Protein Localization in Plants.

Fluorescent proteins (FPs) remarkably advanced the study of cellular biology of plants. The most common application is their use as reporter proteins to determine the subcellular localization of a protein of interest (POI) by endogenous expression of a suitable FP-POI fusion construct in plant cells. In this chapter we describe three approaches, namely, particle bombardment, protoplast transformation, and Agrobacterium infiltration, to transiently express such fusion constructs in plant cells of different species. These approaches are versatile and can be utilized for diverse fluorescent protein-based applications.

Dual targeting of TatA points to a chloroplast-like Tat pathway in plant mitochondria.

The biogenesis of membrane-bound electron transport chains requires membrane translocation pathways for folded proteins carrying complex cofactors, like the Rieske Fe/S proteins. Two independent systems were developed during evolution, namely the Twin-arginine translocation (Tat) pathway, which is present in bacteria and chloroplasts, and the Bcs1 pathway found in mitochondria of yeast and mammals. Mitochondria of plants carry a Tat-like pathway which was hypothesized to operate with only two subunits, a TatB-like protein and a TatC homolog (OrfX), but lacking TatA. Here we show that the nuclearly encoded TatA from pea has dual targeting properties, i.e., it can be imported into both, chloroplasts and mitochondria. Dual targeting of TatA was observed with in organello experiments employing chloroplasts and mitochondria isolated from pea as well as after transient expression of suitable reporter constructs in leaf tissue from pea and Nicotiana benthamiana. The extent of transport of these constructs into mitochondria of transiently transformed leaf cells was relatively low, causing a demand for highly sensitive methods to be detected, like the sasplitGFP approach. Yet, the dual import of TatA into mitochondria and chloroplasts observed here points to a common mechanism of Tat transport for folded proteins within both endosymbiotic organelles in plants.

WHIRLY2 plays a key role in mitochondria morphology, dynamics, and functionality in Arabidopsis thaliana.

WHIRLY2 is a single-stranded DNA binding protein associated with mitochondrial nucleoids. In the why 2-1 mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana, a major proportion of leaf mitochondria has an aberrant structure characterized by disorganized nucleoids, reduced abundance of cristae, and a low matrix density despite the fact that the macroscopic phenotype during vegetative growth is not different from wild type. These features coincide with an impairment of the functionality and dynamics of mitochondria that have been characterized in detail in wild-type and why 2-1 mutant cell cultures. In contrast to the development of the vegetative parts, seed germination is compromised in the why 2-1 mutant. In line with that, the expression level of why 2 in seeds of wild-type plants is higher than that of why 3, whereas in adult plant no difference is found. Intriguingly, in early stages of shoots development of the why 2-1 mutant, although not in seeds, the expression level of why 3 is enhanced. These results suggest that WHIRLY3 is a potential candidate to compensate for the lack of WHIRLY2 in the why 2-1 mutant. Such compensation is possible only if the two proteins are localized in the same organelle. Indeed, in organello protein transport experiments using intact mitochondria and chloroplasts revealed that WHIRLY3 can be dually targeted into both, chloroplasts and mitochondria. Together, these data indicate that the alterations of mitochondria nucleoids are tightly linked to alterations of mitochondria morphology and functionality. This is even more evident in those phases of plant life when mitochondrial activity is particularly high, such as seed germination. Moreover, our results indicate that the differential expression of why 2 and why 3 predetermines the functional replacement of WHIRLY2 by WHIRLY3, which is restricted though to the vegetative parts of the plant.

Dual or Not Dual?-Comparative Analysis of Fluorescence Microscopy-Based Approaches to Study Organelle Targeting Specificity of Nuclear-Encoded Plant Proteins.

Plant cells are unique as they carry two organelles of endosymbiotic origin, namely mitochondria and chloroplasts (plastids) which have specific but partially overlapping functions, e. g., in energy and redox metabolism. Despite housing residual genomes of limited coding capacity, most of their proteins are encoded in the nucleus, synthesized by cytosolic ribosomes and need to be transported "back" into the respective target organelle. While transport is in most instances strictly monospecific, a group of proteins carries "ambiguous" transit peptides mediating transport into both, mitochondria and plastids. However, such dual targeting is often disputed due to variability in the results obtained from different experimental approaches. We have therefore compared and evaluated the most common methods established to study protein targeting into organelles within intact plant cells. All methods are based on fluorescent protein technology and live cell imaging. For our studies, we have selected four candidate proteins with proven dual targeting properties and analyzed their subcellular localization in vivo utilizing four different methods (particle bombardment, protoplast transformation, Agrobacterium infiltration, and transgenic plants). Though using identical expression constructs in all instances, a given candidate protein does not always show the same targeting specificity in all approaches, demonstrating that the choice of method is important, and depends very much on the question to be addressed.

Rather rule than exception? How to evaluate the relevance of dual protein targeting to mitochondria and chloroplasts.

Dual targeting of a nuclearly encoded protein into two different cell organelles is an exceptional event in eukaryotic cells. Yet, the frequency of such dual targeting is remarkably high in case of mitochondria and chloroplasts, the two endosymbiotic organelles of plant cells. In most instances, it is mediated by "ambiguous" transit peptides, which recognize both organelles as the target. A number of different approaches including in silico, in organello as well as both transient and stable in vivo assays are established to determine the targeting specificity of such transit peptides. In this review, we will describe and compare these approaches and discuss the potential role of this unusual targeting process. Furthermore, we will present a hypothetical scenario how dual targeting might have arisen during evolution.