[Value of the association of D-dimer measurement and the evaluation of clinical probability in a non-invasive diagnostic strategy of pulmonary embolism]. / Intérêt de l'association du dosage des D-dimères et de l'évaluation de la probabilité clinique dans une stratégie diagnostique non invasive de l'embolie pulmonaire.

New diagnostic tools in suspected pulmonary embolism complete the classical diagnostic strategy of pulmonary scintigraphy and pulmonary angiography to limit the indications of these two invasive investigations. In a prospective series of 204 consecutive patients with suspected pulmonary embolism the association of D-dimer measurement and clinical probability was assessed for the exclusion of the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. The D-DI Liatest is a new generation, unitary, rapid and quantitative latex test with a comparative diagnostic performance to that of the reference ELISA test, and well adapted to emergency situations.The clinical probability was assessed by a quantitative score based on past history, clinical symptoms and signs. The positive diagnosis of pulmonary embolism was made by spiral CT scanner and/or pulmonary angiography, associated with Duplex ultrasonography of the leg veins in nondiagnostic results. The prevalence of pulmonary embolism was 42.6% and the absence of anticoagulation in patients considered not to have pulmonary embolism was associated with a thrombo-embolic incidence of 0.9% at 3 months. Fifty-six patients had D-dimer concentrations equal or inferior to the threshold of 500 microg/L; the sensitivity was 99% and the specificity 47% with a negative predictive value of 98% to 100% in cases with a low clinical probability. D-dimer measurement is reliable and has a high cost-benefit value in ambulatory patients with suspected of pulmonary embolism and is even more valuable when the clinical probability of this diagnosis is low.

[Patient information and coronary angiography: experience of the Rennes group]. / Information du patient et coronarographie: l'expérience rennaise.

The object of this study was to assess the degree of patient information of subjects referred for coronary angiography and their reaction to a detailed protocol of information. The enquiry was performed in 3 stages: an oral evaluation of the degree of information with a standardised questionnaire; the giving of written documents from the French Federation and Society of Cardiology mentioning the risks of the procedure; the continuation of the interview with evaluation of the degree of satisfactions with the information provided. Two hundred and thirty one patients referred by cardiologists for non-urgent coronary angiography were interrogated (175 men, 56 women; mean age 63 years, range: 27-83 years). In the 164 subjects who had never had this investigation: 56 (34.1%) did not appreciate the invasive nature of the procedure 111 (67.6%) totally ignored the risks of the procedure 70 (42.6%) were not informed of the possibility of a surgical procedure or of an angioplasty as a result of the procedure. 89% were satisfied with the information concerning the risks of the investigation. In a second group of 100 patients, the comprehension of the information was checked by the same questionnaire used a posteriori. These results show that patient information is very often incomplete. Despite some reticence, the new procedures seem to be globally well accepted but would be more effective if used before hospital admission.