Intraarticular injection of anakinra in osteoarthritis of the knee: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical response, safety, and tolerability of a single intraarticular injection of anakinra in patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. METHODS: Patients with OA of the knee were enrolled in a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study and randomized 2:1:2 to receive a single intraarticular injection of placebo, anakinra 50 mg, or anakinra 150 mg in their symptomatic knee. Patients were evaluated for 12 weeks postinjection. The primary end point was the change in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score from baseline to week 4. Safety assessments included the evaluation of adverse events (AEs), laboratory tests, and vital signs. Pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed in a subset of patients. RESULTS: Of 170 patients who enrolled, 160 (94%) completed the study. The mean improvements from baseline to week 4 in the WOMAC score were not statistically different between the placebo group and the patients who received 50 mg of anakinra (P = 0.67) or 150 mg of anakinra (P = 0.77). Anakinra was well tolerated. No withdrawals due to AEs or serious AEs, and no serious infections or deaths were reported. No clinically significant trends were noted in laboratory values or vital signs. Pharmacokinetic parameters demonstrated that the mean terminal half-life of anakinra in serum after intraarticular injection was approximately 4 hours. CONCLUSION: Anakinra was well tolerated as a single 50-mg or 150-mg intraarticular injection in patients with OA of the knee. However, anakinra was not associated with improvements in OA symptoms compared with placebo.

Safety of tacrolimus in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: long-term experience.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term safety of tacrolimus 3 mg/day in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Patients with active RA who had discontinued all DMARDs for at least 2 weeks and had at least five tender/painful joints and three swollen joints, and required DMARD treatment in the opinion of the investigator, were enrolled into this open-label long-term safety trial. In addition, patients who had completed at least 3 months of treatment with tacrolimus 2 mg/day, tacrolimus 3 mg/day or placebo in a Phase III double-blind efficacy trial were allowed to roll over into this study. This latter group of patients did not have to fulfil any joint count requirements prior to entry into the long-term safety study, provided that no more than 14 days had elapsed between the end of their participation in the double-blind study and screening for the long-term safety study. All patients enrolled received tacrolimus 3 mg/day in addition to their current regimen of NSAIDs and corticosteroids. RESULTS: 896 patients received at least one dose of tacrolimus 3 mg. The median duration of treatment was 359 days. 145 patients (16.2%) withdrew from the study for adverse events possibly or probably related to tacrolimus, 33 patients (3.7%) withdrew from the study for adverse events unrelated to tacrolimus and 112 (12.5%) withdrew for lack of efficacy. No adverse event with an incidence >0.7% appeared for the first time after the first 3 months of treatment with 3 mg tacrolimus. 529 patients (59%) experienced an adverse event that was possibly or probably related to tacrolimus; the most common were diarrhoea (14.6%), nausea (10.3%), tremor (9.0%), headache (8.7%), abdominal pain (7.9%), dyspepsia (7.6%), increased creatinine (6.8%) and hypertension (5.4%). Twenty-four patients (2.7%) experienced serious adverse events possibly or probably related to study drug; the most common were pneumonia (0.6%), hyperglycaemia (0.3%), gastroenteritis (0.2%), pancreatitis (0.2%) and diabetes mellitus (0.2%). The mean creatinine level increased from 67+/-19 micromol/l (0.76+/-0.22 mg/dl) at baseline to 75+/-26 micromol/l (0.85+/-0.30 mg/dl) (P<0.0001) at end of treatment. 351 (40.3%) of the 872 patients for whom creatinine levels were available at both baseline and during treatment had > or =30% increase from baseline in serum creatinine during the study, either related or unrelated to tacrolimus, with 73 patients (8.4%) having creatinine levels exceeding the normal range. At end of treatment, 177 patients (20.3%) had a > or =30% increase from baseline in creatinine. Serum creatinine remained within the normal range throughout the trial in approximately 90% of patients. At the end of treatment, the ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70 response rates were 38.4%, 18.6% and 9.0% respectively. Over 26% of patients had at least a 70% improvement in both swollen and painful/tender joints. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that tacrolimus was safe and well-tolerated and provided clinical benefit over a period of at least 12 months.

Positive effect of etidronate therapy is maintained after drug is terminated in patients using corticosteroids.

Following a 52-wk randomized controlled trial of intermittent cyclic etidronate therapy in patients using corticosteroids, we performed a 52-wk open-label trial of calcium alone in 114 corticosteroid-treated patients to determine whether the beneficial effect of etidronate is maintained after the drug is discontinued. All patients were given 500 mg/d of elemental calcium. Sixty-one and 53 patients made up the former placebo and etidronate groups, respectively. A total of 89 (98%) of patients in the former placebo and etidronate groups remained on corticosteroids throughout the second year. The mean (SE) percentage change in bone mineral density of the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and trochanter were compared between groups. The difference between groups in mean percentage change from baseline (wk 0, initiation of etidronate or placebo therapy) in the bone density of the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and trochanter, following 104 wk, was 3.8 (0.9), 3.0 (1.1), and 4.3 (1.1), respectively (p < 0.05, all sites), in favor of the former etidronate group. While not significant, the former placebo group demonstrated a slightly larger rate of decline in bone density over the second year than the former etidronate group at all three sites. Following the discontinuation of etidronate therapy, there was no accelerated bone loss and there was evidence of a residual protective effect in both the lumbar spine and femoral neck for up to 1 yr posttreatment.

Effect of risedronate on the risk of hip fracture in elderly women. Hip Intervention Program Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Risedronate increases bone mineral density in elderly women, but whether it prevents hip fracture is not known. METHODS: We studied 5445 women 70 to 79 years old who had osteoporosis (indicated by a T score for bone mineral density at the femoral neck that was more than 4 SD below the mean peak value in young adults [-4] or lower than -3 plus a nonskeletal risk factor for hip fracture, such as poor gait or a propensity to fall) and 3886 women at least 80 years old who had at least one nonskeletal risk factor for hip fracture or low bone mineral density at the femoral neck (T score, lower than -4 or lower than -3 plus a hip-axis length of 11.1 cm or greater). The women were randomly assigned to receive treatment with oral risedronate (2.5 or 5.0 mg daily) or placebo for three years. The primary end point was the occurrence of hip fracture. RESULTS: Overall, the incidence of hip fracture among all the women assigned to risedronate was 2.8 percent, as compared with 3.9 percent among those assigned to placebo (relative risk, 0.7; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.6 to 0.9; P=0.02). In the group of women with osteoporosis (those 70 to 79 years old), the incidence of hip fracture among those assigned to risedronate was 1.9 percent, as compared with 3.2 percent among those assigned to placebo (relative risk, 0.6; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.4 to 0.9; P=0.009). In the group of women selected primarily on the basis of nonskeletal risk factors (those at least 80 years of age), the incidence of hip fracture was 4.2 percent among those assigned to risedronate and 5.1 percent among those assigned to placebo (P=0.35). CONCLUSIONS: Risedronate significantly reduces the risk of hip fracture among elderly women with confirmed osteoporosis but not among elderly women selected primarily on the basis of risk factors other than low bone mineral density.

Antiinflammatory and analgesic efficacy of COX-2 specific inhibition: from investigational trials to clinical experience.

Research strongly indicates that increased expression of the isoenzyme cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is responsible for elevated production of prostaglandins in inflamed joint tissues and is involved in the mediation of pain. In contrast, COX-1 is a constitutively produced isoenzyme that is involved in the synthesis of eicosanoids that have important homeostatic functions, for example, in the gastric mucosa and platelets. This new knowledge led to the development of drugs that are highly specific inhibitors of COX-2 while not inhibiting COX-1 at maximally efficacious dosages. The first COX-2 specific agent approved for clinical use in the United States was celecoxib. Large multicenter trials have shown that celecoxib at dosages of 100 mg BID and 200 mg BID is as effective as naproxen 500 mg BID in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee or hip. Another large multicenter trial also demonstrated that celecoxib 200 mg BTD and 400 mg BID is as effective as naproxen 500 mg BID in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A comparative trial showed that celecoxib 200 mg BID is as effective as diclofenac SR 75 mg BID in patients with RA. The potential of COX-2 specific inhibitors to provide antiinflammatory and analgesic efficacy equivalent to that of conventional nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs without the adverse gastrointestinal mucosal and platelet effects associated with nonspecific COX inhibitors promises to revolutionize the clinical care of arthritis patients.

Upper gastrointestinal tolerability of celecoxib, a COX-2 specific inhibitor, compared to naproxen and placebo.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability of celecoxib, naproxen, and placebo in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: An analysis of 5, 12-week, randomized, double blind, parallel group, placebo controlled clinical trials was conducted. In these trials, patients were randomized to: naproxen 500 mg bid (n = 1,099), placebo (n = 1,136), celecoxib 50 mg bid (n = 690) (subtherapeutic dose), celecoxib 100 mg (n = 1,131) or 200 mg bid (n = 1,125) (therapeutic dose), or celecoxib 400 mg bid (n = 434) (supratherapeutic dosage). The incidence and time until moderate to severe abdominal pain, dyspepsia, nausea, and any of the aforementioned 3 upper GI symptoms (composite endpoint) were determined using time-to-event analysis. RESULTS: The cumulative incidences of moderate to severe abdominal pain, dyspepsia, or nausea (composite endpoint) were: naproxen 500 mg (12.0%; 95% CI 9.9%-14.0%), celecoxib 50 mg bid (7.1%; 95% CI 5.0%-9.2%), celecoxib 100 mg bid (7.8%; 95% CI 6.0%-9.5%), celecoxib 200 mg bid (8.1%; 95% CI 6.4%-9.9%), celecoxib 400 mg bid (6.0%; 95% CI 3.6%-8.4%), and placebo (8.5%; 95% CI 6.5%-10.8%). After controlling for independent predictors of the composite endpoint, relative risks (RR) for the various treatments relative to naproxen 500 mg bid were: celecoxib 50 mg (RR 0.54; 95% CI 0.37-0.77; p < 0.001), celecoxib 100 mg (RR 0.60; 95% CI 0.45-0.80; p < 0.001), celecoxib 200 mg bid (RR 0.63; 95% CI 0.47-0.83; p = 0.001), celecoxib 400 mg bid (RR 0.56; 95% CI 0.35-0.89; p = 0.015), and placebo (RR 0.63; 95% CI 0.47-0.85; p = 0.002). After controlling for independent predictors of the composite endpoint, celecoxib treatment group patients did not differ from placebo patients when reporting the composite endpoint, with p values ranging from 0.40 to 0.96. CONCLUSION: The upper GI tolerability of celecoxib is superior to naproxen. A dose-response relationship between celecoxib and upper GI symptoms was not apparent.

Treatment of osteoarthritis with celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor, with those of naproxen, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), and placebo in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 1003 patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee were randomly assigned to receive celecoxib at doses of 50, 100, or 200 mg twice a day; naproxen, 500 mg twice a day; or placebo for 12 weeks. Patients were evaluated with standard measures of efficacy 2 to 7 days after discontinuing previous NSAID or analgesic therapy and after 2, 6, and 12 weeks of treatment with the study drug. RESULTS: Celecoxib treatment led to significant improvement in the signs and symptoms of osteoarthritis as determined by all efficacy measures. Significant pain relief occurred within 2 days of the initiation of treatment, and maximum anti-inflammatory and analgesic activity, evident within 2 weeks, was sustained throughout the 12-week study. All celecoxib doses were efficacious compared with placebo, although the 50-mg twice-daily dosage regimen was minimally effective. The higher doses of celecoxib (100 and 200 mg twice a day) were similarly efficacious, and the magnitude of improvement observed with these dosing regimens was comparable to that seen with naproxen at a dose of 500 mg twice a day. All doses of celecoxib and naproxen were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: COX-2 inhibition with celecoxib is an effective approach for the treatment of osteoarthritis, as seen by clinical improvement in signs and symptoms comparable to treatment with naproxen.

36 month intermittent cyclical etidronate treatment in patients with established corticosteroid induced osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the longterm safety and efficacy of etidronate therapy in patients in whom corticosteroid induced bone loss has already occurred. METHODS: We performed a 36 month observational cohort study in which all data were obtained from Canadian Database of Osteoporosis and Osteopenia (CANDOO) patients. The etidronate group consisted of 24 patients who received 400 mg of etidronate disodium for 14 days, followed by 76 days of calcium carbonate (500 mg of elemental calcium), repeated every 3 mo; the control group included 37 patients who received calcium carbonate 500 to 1000 mg daily. Outcome measurements included changes within groups from baseline and differences between groups in the bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and trochanter at 12, 24, and 36 months. The incidence of vertebral fractures was also determined. RESULTS: Etidronate therapy resulted in a meaningful percentage increase from baseline in lumbar spine BMD, primarily during the first 24 months of treatment, and this increase was sustained for the remainder of the 36 month study period (5.2%; p = 0.016). Analysis of covariance revealed a significant percentage difference (SD) between groups in lumbar spine BMD at 12 [5.5 (13.5) percent; p = 0.003] and 24 months [6.0 (17.4) percent; p = 0.011] in favor of the etidronate group. After 3 years of therapy, one patient (4%) experienced one vertebral fracture in the etidronate group, whereas 3 patients (8%) experienced 5 vertebral fractures in the control group. CONCLUSION: Etidronate treatment administered for 36 months reversed lumbar spine bone loss, and appeared to be safe in patients with established corticosteroid induced osteoporosis.

Corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis.

Corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis is a serious disorder that results in significant morbidity. A summary of our understanding of the pathophysiology is provided and highlights some of the controversy the exists. Clinical trials for the prevention and treatment of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis are reviewed.

Intermittent etidronate therapy to prevent corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis.

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Osteoporosis is a recognized complication of corticosteroid therapy. Whether it can be prevented is not known. We conducted a 12-month, randomized, placebo-controlled study of intermittent etidronate (400 mg per day for 14 days) followed by calcium (500 mg per day for 76 days), given for four cycles, in 141 men and women (age, 19 to 87 years) who had recently begun high-dose corticosteroid therapy. The primary outcome measure was the difference in the change in the bone density of the lumbar spine between the groups from base line to week 52. Secondary measures included changes in the bone density of the femoral neck, trochanter, and radius and the rate of new vertebral fractures. RESULTS: The mean (+/-SE) bone density of the lumbar spine and trochanter in the etidronate group increased 0.61 +/- 0.54 and 1.46 +/- 0.67 percent, respectively, as compared with decreases of 3.23 +/- 0.60 and 2.74 +/- 0.66 percent, respectively, in the placebo group. The mean differences between the groups after one year were 3.72 +/- 0.88 percentage points for the lumbar spine (P = 0.02) and 4.14 +/- 0.94 percentage points for the trochanter (P = 0.02). The changes in the femoral neck and the radius were not significantly different between the groups. There was an 85 percent reduction in the proportion of postmenopausal woman with new vertebral fractures in the etidronate group as compared with the placebo group (1 of 31 patients vs. 7 of 32 patients, P = 0.05), and the etidronate-treated postmenopausal women also had significantly fewer vertebral fractures per patient (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Intermittent etidronate therapy prevents the loss of vertebral and trochanteric bone in corticosteroid-treated patients.

Back to the future: the pyramids of rheumatoid arthritis.

The management treatment pyramid, treatment target and treatment pyramids provide a framework for RA management and treatment. This model brings back the traditional pyramid, which was widely accepted, and adapts it to our newer understanding of RA treatment. It provides a focus for care, as well as the flexibility to apply selective treatments to different temperaments of disease. We hope that these models will fill the void left by the abandonment of the traditional pyramid. We certainly need a model to refocus the patient and physician to the importance of RA and bring "order out of chaos". With our current knowledge, resources, and drugs, we could be making a far greater impact on this serious, expensive, and crippling disease. We must re-excite and re-educate the public, the patient, and the profession to the remarkable progress we have made with incurable but very treatable arthritis.

Salmon calcitonin nasal spray in the prevention of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis.

The objectives were to determine the efficacy and safety of nasal salmon calcitonin 200 IU daily in the prevention of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. A minimized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was carried out in corticosteroid-treated patients with polymyalgia rheumatica. The setting was a tertiary care university-affiliated hospital and a total of 31 patients were enrolled. The primary outcome measure was the percentage change in bone mineral density of the lumbar spine in the two treatment groups from baseline to 1 yr of follow-up. The mean +/- S.D. bone mineral density of the lumbar spine in the calcitonin-treated group decreased by 1.29 +/- 6.76% and in the placebo group by 4.95 +/- 3.50% after 12 months. The observed difference of 3.65 +/- 2.10% between groups is statistically significant (P < 0.05). Nasal salmon calcitonin prevented loss of bone in the lumbar spine as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

A double-blind randomised controlled trial of the effects of medroxyprogesterone acetate on bone density of women taking oestrogen replacement therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of medroxyprogesterone acetate on bone density in women who have had a hysterectomy. DESIGN: Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of medroxyprogesterone acetate 10 mg, 20 mg or placebo as an adjunct to oestrogen therapy. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and twenty-three women, aged 18 to 45 years and currently receiving daily oestrogen, who presented at a university-based rheumatology practice. INTERVENTIONS: The women were randomly assigned to receive either medroxyprogesterone acetate 10 mg, 20 mg or placebo daily beginning on day 15 of each month for one year. Forty-one women were randomised into each group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome measurement was the percentage of change from baseline in bone mineral density of the lumbar spine (L2-L4). Secondary outcome measures included differences in femoral neck bone density, cholesterol and triglyceride levels between groups. RESULTS: At one year, change in bone mineral density did not differ between either the treatment or placebo groups. Medroxyprogesterone acetate 20 mg and 10 mg led to statistically significant reductions in very low density lipoprotein cholesterol, total triglycerides, and very low density lipoprotein triglycerides when compared with placebo. Medroxyprogesterone acetate 20 mg also led to a statistically significant reduction in high density lipoprotein cholesterol, high density lipoprotein-2 cholesterol, and high density lipoprotein-2 triglycerides. CONCLUSIONS: Medroxyprogesterone acetate at either dose as an adjunct to oestrogen did not improve bone mineral density at one year when compared with placebo. Medroxyprogesterone acetate 10 mg may not adversely affect lipids. Medroxyprogesterone acetate 20 mg, however, did reduce high density lipoprotein cholesterol and therefore may increase cardiovascular risk.

Fluoride therapy in prevention of rheumatoid arthritis induced bone loss.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of sodium fluoride (40 mg/day) in preventing rheumatoid arthritis (RA) induced bone loss, which may lead to osteoporosis. METHODS: We conducted an 18 month, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trial in 38 patients with RA. The primary outcome measure was the difference in the percentage change between groups in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) from baseline values after 18 months of therapy. The secondary outcome measures were the differences in the percentage change between groups in femoral neck, Ward's triangle, trochanter, and total body BMD from baseline after 18 months of therapy. RESULTS: There was a significant percentage difference (SD) between groups of 6.2% (7.3%) (p = 0.0005) in lumbar spine BMD after 18 months of treatment in favor of the fluoride group. The fluoride group experienced a 5.2% (8.4%) (p = 0.0125) increase, whereas the placebo group showed a 1.0% (4.8%) (p = 0.8015) decrease in lumbar spine BMD after treatment. No significant differences were found for the femoral neck, Ward's triangle, trochanter, and total body BMD in terms of the percentage changes from baseline within each treatment group or in the differences in the degree of change between groups after therapy. Lumbar spine BMD increased in about 80% of patients treated with fluoride (responders) compared to 44% of patients treated with placebo. CONCLUSION: The results showed that fluoride therapy was well tolerated and increased vertebral bone mass in patients with RA.

Vitamin D and calcium in the prevention of corticosteroid induced osteoporosis: a 3 year followup.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of vitamin D 50,000 units/week and calcium 1,000 mg/day in the prevention of corticosteroid induced osteoporosis. METHODS: A minimized double blind, placebo controlled trial in corticosteroid treated subjects in a tertiary care university affiliated hospital. The sample was 62 subjects with polymyalgia rheumatica, temporal arteritis, asthma, vasculitis, or systemic lupus erythematosus. The primary outcome measure was the percentage change in bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine in the 2 treatment groups from baseline to 36 mo followup. RESULTS: BMD of the lumbar spine in the vitamin D and calcium treated group decreased by a mean (SD) of 2.6% (4.1%) at 12 mo, 3.7% (4.5%) at 24 mo, and 2.2% (5.8%) at 36 mo. In the placebo group there was a decrease of 4.1% (4.1%) at 12 mo, 3.8% (5.6%) at 24 mo, and 1.5% (8.8%) at 36 mo. The observed differences between groups were not statistically significant. The difference at 36 mo was-0.693% (95% CI -5.34, 3.95). CONCLUSION: Vitamin D and calcium may help prevent the early loss of bone seen in the lumbar spine as measured by densitometry of the lumbar spine. Longterm vitamin D and calcium in those undergoing extended therapy with corticosteroids does not appear to be beneficial.

Intermittent cyclic therapy with etidronate prevents corticosteroid-induced bone loss: two years of follow-up.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of intermittent cyclic therapy (ICT) with etidronate in preventing the loss of lumbar vertebral bone mineral density (BMD) in patients taking corticosteroids. The study population was a cohort of patients taking corticosteroids for at least two years for polymyalgia rheumatica, asthma, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus or other conditions. A tertiary care university teaching hospital-affiliated rheumatology office practice. Inclusion and exclusion criteria yielded eighty-eight patients taking corticosteroids for at least two years who had not taken estrogen or fluoride and had no causes of secondary osteoporosis. Changes relative to baseline in individual vertebral (L2-L4) BMD measurements after one and two years were compared between patients who had taken ICT with etidronate (n = 42) and those who had not (n = 46). We found that BMD in the lumbar spine increased significantly over baseline in patients who had taken ICT with etidronate, by 3.9% after one year and by 5.6% after two years, whereas it decreased by 3.7-3.8% in patients who had not. We conclude that ICT with etidronate prevents corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis and progressively ameliorates BMD over two years. Double blind trials are underway to evaluate whether this increased BMD is associated with reductions in vertebral fracture rates.

A multicenter study of nabumetone and diclofenac SR in patients with osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct the first Canadian study of the comparative efficacy and safety of nabumetone and diclofenac SR in patients with primary osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip, knee and shoulder. METHODS: Nabumetone 1000-1500 mg po daily was compared to diclofenac SR 100-150 mg po daily in a 6-month, double blind, randomized, controlled, multicenter, parallel trial. Initial starting doses were nabumetone 1000 mg daily and diclofenac SR 100 mg daily, with optional subsequent one-level dose titration permitted after 2 weeks on lower dose up to 1500 mg nabumetone and 150 mg diclofenac SR. The primary outcome measures were overall pain and disease activity as assessed by physician and patient. Secondary efficacy measures included tenderness, swelling, limitation of motion, duration of morning stiffness, acetaminophen consumption, physician and patient global assessment, and patient evaluation of efficacy and tolerability. Following an initial screening visit and a 2 to 7 day nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug free washout period (i.e., randomization), patients were assessed at Weeks 2, 8, 14, 20, and 26. RESULTS: In all, 382 patients [nabumetone (n = 192), diclofenac SR (n = 190)] participated in the trial. Improvement in all efficacy variables was noted, but there was no statistically significant difference between drugs. Significantly fewer (p = 0.01) patients reported upper gastrointestinal (GI) adverse experiences in the nabumetone group. Significantly fewer (p < 0.04) patients withdrew from the study for adverse experiences in the nabumetone (14%) than the diclofenac SR (23%) group, particularly from upper abdominal pain (p < 0.04) and dyspepsia (p = 0.02). Three patients treated with diclofenac SR and none with nabumetone developed upper GI ulcers or bleeds. The number of patients experiencing clinically important elevations in transaminases (p < 0.04) or BUN/creatinine (p < 0.03) was significantly lower in the nabumetone group. CONCLUSION: Nabumetone is efficacious and well tolerated in patients with OA of the hip, knee or shoulder. In this group of patients it was similar in efficacy and superior in tolerability to diclofenac SR.

Intermittent cyclic therapy with etidronate in the prevention of corticosteroid induced bone loss.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the potential efficacy of intermittent cyclic therapy (ICT) with etidronate in the treatment of patients with corticosteroid induced osteoporosis. METHODS: Cohort study in a tertiary care university affiliated hospital in corticosteroid treated patients, with polymyalgia rheumatica, asthma, systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, or temporal arteritis, examining the effects of ICT etidronate. Patients were included if they were taking corticosteroids for a minimum of one year. Comparison patients were those who had been taking corticosteroids for a minimum of one year and who had not been treated with etidronate or other medication which might alter bone metabolism. A total of 68 patients were included from 253 considered. The mean (SD) dose of prednisone in the ICT etidronate treated patients was 9.3 (6.2) mg and in the comparison patients 9.4 (5.9) mg. The duration of prednisone therapy was 7.8 (5.8) years and 3.4 (4.2) years, respectively (p2 < 0.001). An analysis of covariance demonstrated that this difference did not alter our primary outcome measure. The primary outcome measure was the difference in the percentage change from baseline to one year of followup in bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine between treatment and comparison groups. RESULTS: ICT etidronate resulted in a statistically significant and clinically important increase in BMD. The BMD of the lumbar spine increased by 3.82% (0.65%), [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.51 to 5.14%] in the 35 ICT etidronate treated patients and decreased by 1.78% (0.76%), [95% CI, -3.34 to -0.23%] in the 33 comparison patients after 12 months (p2 < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: ICT etidronate prevented loss of vertebral bone density in patients with corticosteroid induced osteoporosis. Controlled, double blind, prospective trials with longer followup are needed to confirm these results and to demonstrate that increases in bone mass translate into decreased fracture rates.

Corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis.

Corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis is a major problem faced by rheumatologists, with up to 50% of patients at increased risk for vertebral fractures. Our current understanding of the pathophysiology of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis suggests two basic problems: a reduction in bone formation and an increase in bone resorption leading to an overall reduction in bone mass. Adequate calcium and vitamin D intake, calcitonin, hormone-replacement therapy, and thiazide diuretics are of benefit in preventing corticosteroid-induced bone loss. Other therapies such as the bisphosphonates, fluoride, and anabolic steroids should be considered when fractures occur or ongoing bone loss is evident. A review of the literature outlining the pathophysiology, clinical features, assessment, and treatment is presented.

Double-blind randomized controlled trial of flurbiprofen-SR (ANSAID-SR) and diclofenac sodium-SR (Voltaren-SR) in the treatment of osteoarthritis.

A six week, double-blind, randomized, parallel group, multicentre study was conducted in 85 patients with osteoarthritis of the knee and hip to compare the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of Flurbiprofen-SR 200 mg with Diclofenac Sodium-SR 100 mg. Between group comparisons, based on change scores from baseline, we detected no significant differences between the two drugs with respect to efficacy for the majority of outcome measures. There was no significant difference between the groups in the proportion of patients experiencing at least one adverse medical event or in terminations from treatment. We conclude that Flurbiprofen-SR 200 mg is similar in efficacy, tolerability, and safety to Diclofenac Sodium-SR in this trial.