Selective modulation of nociceptive processing due to noise distraction.

This study investigates the effects of noise distraction on the different components and sources of laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) whilst attending to either the spatial component (localisation performance task) or the affective component (unpleasantness rating task) of pain. LEPs elicited by CO2 laser stimulation of the right forearm were recorded from 64 electrodes in 18 consenting healthy volunteers. Subjects reported either pain location or unpleasantness, in the presence and absence of distraction by continuous 85 dBa white noise. Distributed sources of the LEP peaks were identified using Low Resolution Electromagnetic Tomography (LORETA). Pain unpleasantness ratings and P2 (430 ms) peak amplitude were significantly reduced by distraction during the unpleasantness task, whereas the localisation ability and the corresponding N1/N2 (310 ms) peak amplitude remained unchanged. Noise distraction (at 310 ms) reduced activation in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and precuneus during attention to localisation and unpleasantness, respectively. This suggests a complimentary role for these two areas in the control of attention to pain. In contrast, activation of the occipital pole and SII were enhanced by noise during the localisation and unpleasantness task, respectively, suggesting that the presence of noise was associated with increased spatial attentional load. This study has shown selective modulation of affective pain processing by noise distraction, indicated by a reduction in the unpleasantness ratings and P2 peak amplitude and associated activity within the medial pain system. These results show that processing of the affective component of pain can be differentially modulated by top-down processes, providing a potential mechanism for therapeutic intervention.

'Prior entry' for pain: attention speeds the perceptual processing of painful stimuli.

We investigated whether the perception of simultaneity for pairs of nociceptive and visual stimuli was dependent upon the focus of participants' attention to a particular sensory modality (either pain or vision). Two stimuli (one painful and the other visual) were presented randomly at different stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) using the method of constant stimuli. Participants made unspeeded verbal responses as to which stimulus they perceived as having been presented first, or else responded that the two stimuli were presented simultaneously. This temporal discrimination task was repeated under three different attention conditions (blocks): divided attention, attend pain, and attend vision. The results showed that under conditions of divided attention, nociceptive stimuli had to be presented before visual stimuli in order for the two to be perceived as simultaneous. A comparison of the two focused attention conditions revealed that the painful stimulus was perceived as occurring earlier in time (relative to the visual stimulus) when attention was directed toward pain than when it was directed toward vision. These results provide the first empirical demonstration that attention can modulate the temporal perception of painful stimuli.

Lateralisation of nociceptive processing in the human brain: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Nociceptive processing within the human brain takes place within two distinct and parallel systems: the lateral and medial pain systems. Current knowledge indicates that the lateral system is involved in processing the sensory-discriminative aspects of pain, and that the medial system is involved in processing the affective-motivational aspects of pain. Hemispheric differences in brain activation (lateralisation) during nociceptive processing were studied to further clarify the division of function between the lateral and medial pain systems. Hemispheric lateralisation was studied by applying painful CO(2) laser stimuli of 3-s duration sequentially to the left and right medial lower calves of five normal right-handed human subjects. The resultant brain activity was measured using 3-T functional magnetic resonance imaging, by determining significant changes in blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal and applying a general linear modelling approach. Volumes of interest were defined for the primary and secondary somatosensory cortices (SI and SII), the insular cortex, and the thalamus, on individual subjects' high-resolution structural scans. Hemispheric lateralisation was quantified by comparing the level of activation between brain hemispheres within each volume of interest. In SII, no significant hemispheric difference in activation was detected. In the insula, activation was significantly greater in the left hemisphere than the right. In both SI and the thalamus, activation in response to painful stimulation was significantly greater in the hemisphere contralateral to the stimulus, which is consistent with these areas being involved in processing the sensory-discriminative aspects of pain.

Dipole source localisation using independent component analysis: single trial localisation of laser evoked pain.

The accuracy of the inverse solution that finds the spatial location of the generating sources from averaged scalp-recorded event related potentials (ERPs) relies on assumptions about the ERP signals and the sources. We provide evidence that using independent component analysis (ICA) as a signal decomposition filter prior to applying the inverse solution reveals sources that cannot be detected by conventional source localisation methods. Five clusters of sources emerged: a single source cluster in caudal cingulate and bilateral sources in secondary somatosensory cortex (SII), inferior parietal cortex, premotor cortex and insular cortex. The locations of the source dipoles were consistent with findings using fMRI and PET but have not all been previously detected in a single electrophysiological study. In addition, the time-course of the activation of these dipoles was estimated. The results suggest that using ICA to localise single trial data is a powerful tool for exploring the spatiotemporal dynamics of rapid and complex brain processes.

Caudal cingulate cortex involvement in pain processing: an inter-individual laser evoked potential source localisation study using realistic head models.

Electrophysiological studies have revealed a source of laser pain evoked potentials (LEPs) in cingulate cortex. However, few studies have used realistically shaped head models in the source analysis, which account for individual differences in anatomy and allow detailed anatomical localisation of sources. The aim of the current study was to accurately localise the cingulate source of LEPs in a group of healthy volunteers, using realistic head models, and to assess the inter-individual variability in anatomical location. LEPs, elicited by painful CO(2) laser stimulation of the right forearm, were recorded from 62 electrodes in five healthy subjects. Dipole source localisation (CURRY 4.0) was performed on the most prominent (P2) peak of each LEP data set, using head models derived from each subject's structural magnetic resonance image (MRI).For all subjects, the P2 LEP peak was best explained by a dipole whose origin was in cingulate cortex (mean residual variance was 3.9+/-2.4 %). For four out of five subjects, it was located at the border of the caudal division of left anterior cingulate cortex (area 24/32') with left posterior cingulate cortex (area 23/31). For the fifth subject the dipole was centred in right posterior cingulate cortex (area 31). This study demonstrates that the location of the cingulate source of LEPs is highly consistent across subjects, when analysed in this way, and supports the involvement of caudal cingulate regions in pain processing.

Selective attention to pain: a psychophysical investigation.

Laboratory research suggests that the processing of painful stimuli can be modulated by selective attention to a particular sensory modality. However, alternative accounts for previous findings remain possible in terms of task-switching and spatial attention effects. In the present study, we examined whether attention can be selectively directed to the pain modality in order to facilitate the processing of the sensory-discriminative aspects of painful laser heat stimuli when these alternatives were ruled out. Participants made speeded spatial discrimination responses to an unpredictable sequence of painful laser heat and visual stimuli presented on the left forearm. On each trial, a symbolic cue predicted the likely modality for the upcoming target on the majority of trials. Participants responded more rapidly when the target was presented in the expected as opposed to the unexpected modality, demonstrating that selective attention can modulate the processing of painful stimuli. These findings are discussed in relation to contemporary theories of crossmodal attention and multisensory information-processing.