ABSTRACT
Immunophenotyping by flow cytometry is an integral part of the diagnosis and classification of leukemias/lymphomas. The expression of ROR1 associated with chronic B lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is well described in the literature, both in its diagnosis and in the follow-up of minimal residual disease (MRD) research, however, there are few studies regarding the expression pattern of ROR1 in other subtypes of mature B lymphoid neoplasms. With the aim of evaluating the expression of ROR1 and associating it with the expression of other important markers for the differentiation of mature B lymphoid neoplasms (MBLN), 767 samples of cases that entered our laboratory for immunophenotyping with clinical suspicion of MBLN were studied. ROR1 expression is predominant in CD5+/CD10- neoplasms. Overall, positive ROR1 expression was observed in 461 (60.1%) cases. The CD5+/CD10- group had a significantly higher proportion of ROR1 positive samples (89.9%) and more brightly expressed ROR1 than the other groups. Our results highlight the importance of evaluating ROR1 expression in the diagnosis of MBLN to contribute to the differential diagnosis, and possibly therapy of mainly CLL, and indicate that this marker could be considered as a useful addition to immunophenotypic panels, particularly for more challenging cases.
Subject(s)
Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell , Lymphoma , Humans , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/pathology , Flow Cytometry/methods , Immunophenotyping , Receptor Tyrosine Kinase-like Orphan Receptors/geneticsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Herein, we aimed to follow up on the cellular and humoral immune responses of a group of individuals who initially received the CoronaVac vaccine, followed by a booster with the Pfizer vaccine. METHODS: Blood samples were collected: before and 30 days after the first CoronaVac dose; 30, 90, and 180 days after the second CoronaVac dose, and also 20 days after the booster with the Pfizer vaccine. RESULTS: Whilst the positivity to gamma interferon-type cellular response increased after the first CoronaVac dose, neutralizing and IgG antibody levels only raised 30 days after the second dose, followed by a drop in these responses after 90 and 180 days. The booster with the Pfizer vaccine elicited a robust cellular and humoral response. A higher number of double-negative and senescent T cells, as well as increased pro-inflammatory cytokines levels were found in the participants with lower humoral immune responses. CONCLUSION: CoronaVac elicited an early cellular response, followed by a humoral response, which dropped 90 days after the second dose. The booster with the Pfizer vaccine significantly enhanced these responses. Furthermore, a pro-inflammatory systemic status was found in volunteers who presented senescent T cells, which could putatively impair the immune response to vaccination.
