Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am Surg ; 89(7): 3284-3285, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36852729

ABSTRACT

Congenital lobar emphysema (CLE) is a rare developmental lung disorder characterized by lobar hyperinflation secondary to bronchopulmonary obstruction. Half of patients are symptomatic at birth, with many requiring urgent or emergent surgical resection to treat respiratory distress. Meanwhile, patients achieving late childhood or adolescence without symptoms usually never require surgery. We present a case of a 26 year old otherwise healthy female with known CLE who developed massive hemoptysis and required urgent videoscopic (VATS) resection of her right lung upper lobe. We know of no other report of CLE causing life-threatening bleeding at any age, and herein review pathology and pathophysiology of the condition.


Subject(s)
Hemoptysis , Pulmonary Emphysema , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Female , Child , Adult , Hemoptysis/surgery , Hemoptysis/complications , Pulmonary Emphysema/complications , Pulmonary Emphysema/surgery , Pulmonary Emphysema/pathology , Lung/surgery , Dyspnea
2.
J Pediatr Nurs ; 30(5): 668-76, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26165785

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The STARx Questionnaire was designed with patient and provider input, to measure self-management and transition skills in adolescents and young adults (AYA) with chronic health conditions. With proven reliability and an empirically-based factor structure, the self-report STARx Questionnaire requires further validation to demonstrate its clinical and research utility. In this study we examine the concurrent, predictive, and discriminant validity of the STARx Questionnaire. METHODS: To examine concurrent validity, the STARx Questionnaire was compared to two other published transition readiness tools. Predictive validity was examined using linear regressions between the STARx Total Score and literacy, medication adherence, quality of life, and health services use. Discriminant validity was examined by comparing the performance of three chronic illness conditions on the STARx Total Score and associated subscales. RESULTS: The STARx Questionnaire and its subscales positively correlated with the scores for both transition readiness tools reflecting strong concurrent validity. The STARx Questionnaire also correlated positively with the literacy, self-efficacy, and adherence measures indicating strong predictive validity; however, it did not correlate with either quality of life or health care utilization. The performance of AYA across three different clinical conditions was not significant, indicating the clinical utility of this HCT tool for a variety of chronic health conditions. CONCLUSION: The strong validity of the STARx Questionnaire, in tandem with its strong reliability, indicated adequate psychometric properties for this generic self-report measure. These strong psychometric properties should contribute to the STARx being a viable measure of health care transition for both research and clinical purposes.


Subject(s)
Chronic Disease/therapy , Self Care/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires , Transition to Adult Care/organization & administration , Adolescent , Chronic Disease/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Program Evaluation , Quality of Life , Reproducibility of Results , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...