Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 17 de 17
Filter
1.
Am J Emerg Med ; 38(11): 2400-2404, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33041123

ABSTRACT

Sepsis is a significant public health crisis in the United States, contributing to 50% of inpatient hospital deaths. Given its dramatic health effects and implications in the setting of new CMS care guidelines, ED leaders have renewed focus on appropriate and timely sepsis care, including timely administration of antibiotics in patients at risk for sepsis. Modeling the success of multidisciplinary bedside huddles in improving compliance with appropriate care in other healthcare settings, a Sepsis Huddle was implemented in a large, academic ED, with the goal of driving compliance with standardized sepsis care as described in the CMS SEP-1 measure. A retrospective cohort analysis was performed, with the primary finding that utilization of the Sepsis Huddle resulted in antibiotics being administered on average 41 min sooner than when the Sepsis Huddle was not performed. Given that literature suggests that early administration of appropriate antibiotic therapy is a major driver of mortality reduction in patients with sepsis, this study represents a proof of concept that utilization of a Sepsis Huddle may serve to improve outcomes among ED patients at risk for sepsis.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Checklist , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Sepsis/drug therapy , Time-to-Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Blood Culture , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Early Medical Intervention , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Fluid Therapy , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Lactic Acid/blood , Male , Patient Care Bundles , Retrospective Studies , Sepsis/blood , Sepsis/diagnosis , United States
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32962905

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Increasing numbers of patients with psychiatric illness are boarding in emergency departments (EDs) for longer periods. Many patients are at high risk of harm to self, and maintaining their safety is critical. The objectives of this study are to describe the development and implementation of a comprehensive safety precautions protocol for ED patients at risk for self-harm and to report the observed changes in rates of self-harm. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team developed comprehensive safety precautions, including the creation of safe bathrooms, increasing the number and training of observers, protocols to manage access to belongings and for clothing search or removal, and additional interventions for exceptionally high-risk patients. Events of attempted self-harm were measured for 12 months before and after new safety precautions were enacted. RESULTS: In the 12 months prior to the protocol initiation, among 4,408 at-risk patients, there were 13 episodes of attempted self-harm (2.95 per 1,000 at-risk patients), and 6 that resulted in actual self-harm (1.36 per 1,000 at-risk patients). In the 12 months after the protocol was introduced, among the 4,523 at-risk patients, there were 6 episodes of attempted self-harm (1.33 per 1,000 at-risk patients, p = 0.11) and only 1 that resulted in actual self-harm (0.22 per 1,000 at-risk patients, p = 0.07). There were no deaths. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive safety precautions can be successfully developed and implemented in the ED. These precautions correlated with lower, although not statistically significant, rates of self-harm. Further study of similar interventions with adequately powered samples could be beneficial.

4.
J Patient Saf ; 15(4): e60-e63, 2019 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28650384

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Incident reporting is a recognized tool for healthcare quality improvement. These systems, which aim to capture near-misses and harm events, enable organizations to gather critical information about failure modes and design mitigation strategies. Although many hospitals have employed these systems, little is known about safety themes in emergency medicine incident reporting. Our objective was to systematically analyze and thematically code 1 year of incident reports. METHODS: A mixed-methods analysis was performed on 1 year of safety reporting data from a large, urban tertiary-care emergency department using a modified grounded theory approach. RESULTS: Between January 1 and December 31, 2015, there were 108,436 emergency department visits. During this time, 750 incident reports were filed. Twenty-nine themes were used to code the reports, with 744 codes applied. The most common themes were related to delays (138/750, 18.4%), medication safety (136/750, 18.1%), and failures in communication (110/750, 14.7%). A total of 48.8% (366/750) of reports were submitted by nurses. CONCLUSIONS: The most prominent themes during 1 year of incident reports were related to medication safety, delays, and communication. Relative to hospital-wide reporting patterns, a higher proportion of reports were submitted by physicians. Despite this, overall incident reporting remains low, and more is needed to engage physicians in reporting.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medicine , Emergency Service, Hospital , Hospitals , Patient Safety , Quality of Health Care , Risk Management , Humans , Medical Errors , Quality Improvement , Risk Management/methods , Safety Management/methods
5.
Am J Med Qual ; 34(3): 260-265, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30235933

ABSTRACT

Patient-provider communication has been recognized as a critical area of focus for improved health care quality, with a mounting body of evidence tying patient satisfaction and provider communication to important health care outcomes. Despite this, few programs have been studied in the emergency department (ED) setting. The authors designed a communication curriculum and conducted trainings for all ED clinical staff. Although only 72% of clinicians believed the course would be a valuable use of their time before taking it, 97% reported that it was a valuable use of their time after ( P < .001). Pre-course self-evaluation of knowledge, skill, and ability were high. Despite this, post-course self-efficacy improved statistically significantly. This study suggests that it is possible, in a brief training session, to deliver communication content that participants felt was relevant to their practice, improved their skills and knowledge, changed their attitude, and was perceived to be a valuable use of their time.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital , Inservice Training/methods , Interdisciplinary Communication , Quality Improvement , Curriculum , Educational Measurement , Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Emergency Service, Hospital/standards , Female , Humans , Inservice Training/organization & administration , Male , Patient Satisfaction , Physician-Patient Relations , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Quality of Health Care
6.
Psychiatr Serv ; 69(12): 1230-1237, 2018 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30256183

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study measured the presence, extent, and type of behavioral health factors in a high-cost Medicare population and their association with the probability and intensity of emergency department (ED) use. METHODS: Retrospective claims analysis and a comprehensive electronic medical record-based review were conducted for patients enrolled in a 65-month prospective care management program at an academic tertiary medical center (N=3,620). A two-part model used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate the effect of behavioral health factors on the probability of ED use, complemented by a Poisson model to measure the number of ED visits. Control variables included demographic characteristics, poststudy survival, and hierarchical condition category risk score. RESULTS: After analyses controlled for comorbidities and other relevant variables, patients with two or more behavioral health diagnosis categories or two or more behavioral health medications were about twice as likely as those without such categories or medications to use the ED. Patients with a diagnosis category of psychosis, neuropsychiatric disorders, sleep disorders, or adjustment disorders were significantly more likely than those without these disorders to use the ED. Most primary ED diagnoses were not of behavioral health conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Behavioral health factors had a substantial and significant effect on the likelihood and number of ED visits in a population of high-cost Medicare patients. Attention to behavioral health factors as independent predictors of ED use may be useful in influencing ED use in high-cost populations.


Subject(s)
Electronic Health Records , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Managed Care Programs/statistics & numerical data , Medicaid/statistics & numerical data , Medicare/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/therapy , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Emergency Service, Hospital/economics , Female , Humans , Male , Managed Care Programs/economics , Medicare/economics , Mental Disorders/economics , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , United States
7.
West J Emerg Med ; 19(3): 467-473, 2018 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29760842

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Emergency departments (ED) and hospitals face increasing challenges related to capacity, throughput, and stewardship of limited resources while maintaining high quality. Appropriate utilization of extremity magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations within the emergency setting is not well known. Therefore, this study aimed to determine indications for and appropriateness of MRI of the extremities for musculoskeletal conditions in the ED observation unit (EDOU). METHODS: We conducted this institutional review board-approved, retrospective study in a large, quaternary care academic center and Level I trauma center. An institutional database was queried retrospectively to identify all adult patients undergoing an extremity MRI while in the EDOU during the two-year study period from October 2013 through September 2015. We compared clinical history with the American College of Radiology (ACR) Appropriateness Criteria® for musculoskeletal indications. The primary outcome was appropriateness of musculoskeletal MRI exams of the extremities; examinations with an ACR Criteria score of seven or higher were deemed appropriate. Secondary measures included MRI utilization and imaging findings. RESULTS: During the study period, 22,713 patients were evaluated in the EDOU. Of those patients, 4,409 had at least one MRI performed, and 88 MRIs met inclusion criteria as musculoskeletal extremity examinations (2% of all patients undergoing an MRI exam in the EDOU during the study period). The most common exams were foot (27, 31%); knee (26, 30%); leg/femur (10, 11%); and shoulder (10, 11%). The most common indications were suspected infection (42, 48%) and acute trauma (23, 26%). Fifty-six percent of exams were performed with intravenous contrast; and 83% (73) of all MRIs were deemed appropriate based on ACR Criteria. The most common reason for inappropriate imaging was lack of performance of radiographs prior to MRI. CONCLUSION: The majority of musculoskeletal extremity MRI examinations performed in the EDOU were appropriate based on ACR Appropriateness Criteria. However, the optimal timing and most-appropriate site for performance of many clinically appropriate musculoskeletal extremity MRIs performed in the EDOU remains unclear. Potential deferral to the outpatient setting may be a preferred population health management strategy.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Extremities , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/standards , Physical Examination , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Musculoskeletal Pain/etiology , Radiography , Retrospective Studies
8.
Am J Emerg Med ; 36(3): 359-361, 2018 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28811211

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients who return to the Emergency Department (ED) within 72h of discharge are often used for ED Quality Assurance efforts, however little is known about the yield of this kind of review and the types of errors it identifies. Our objective was to identify the prevalence, types and severity of errors in these cases. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients who presented to an urban, university affiliated ED between 10/1/2012-9/30/2015 who returned within 72 h requiring hospital admission. RESULTS: There were 413,167 ED visits during the study period with 2001 (0.48%) patients who returned within 72h and were admitted to the hospital. An event requiring further investigation was identified in 59 (2.95%) of these patients and 50 (2.49%) of them were deemed to represent a deviation from optimal care. Of these, 48 (96%) represented diagnostic error. When a standard diagnostic process of care framework was applied to these, the majority of cases represented failures in the initial diagnostic pathway (29 cases, 60.4%). When Error Severity Codes were applied, 16 (32%) resulted in minor harm and 34 (68%) resulted in major harm or death. CONCLUSION: Screening of 72h ED returns has low yield in identifying suboptimal care, with less than 3% of cases representing deviations from standard care. Of these, the majority represent cognitive errors in the diagnostic pathway. These reviews may be useful as a tool for Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation of individual clinicians, however likely serve less value in identifying systems issues contributing to unsafe care.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Errors/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Service, Hospital , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Patient Admission/statistics & numerical data , Prevalence , Quality of Health Care , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors
9.
West J Emerg Med ; 18(5): 780-784, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28874928

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Emergency department observation units (EDOUs) are a valuable alternative to inpatient admissions for ED patients needing extended care. However, while the use of advanced imaging is becoming more common in the ED, there are no studies characterizing the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations in the EDOU. METHODS: This institutional review board-approved, retrospective study was performed at a 999-bed quaternary care academic Level I adult and pediatric trauma center, with approximately 114,000 ED visits annually and a 32-bed adult EDOU. We retrospectively reviewed the EDOU patient database for all MRI examinations done from October 1, 2013, to September 30, 2015. We sought to describe the most frequent uses for MRI during EDOU admissions and reviewed EDOU length of stay (LOS) to determine whether the use of MRI was associated with any change in LOS. RESULTS: A total of 22,840 EDOU admissions were recorded during the two-year study period, and 4,437 (19%) of these patients had a least one MRI examination during their stay; 2,730 (62%) of these studies were of the brain, head, or neck, and an additional 1,392 (31%) were of the spine. There was no significant difference between the median LOS of admissions in which an MRI study was performed (17.5 hours) and the median LOS (17.7 hours) of admissions in which an MRI study was not performed [p=0.33]. CONCLUSION: Neuroimaging makes up the clear majority of MRI examinations from our EDOU, and the use of MRI does not appear to prolong EDOU LOS. Future work should focus on the appropriateness of these MRI examinations to determine potential resource and cost savings.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Units/statistics & numerical data , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/statistics & numerical data , Neuroimaging/statistics & numerical data , Databases, Factual , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Massachusetts/epidemiology , Observation , Retrospective Studies , Trauma Centers/statistics & numerical data
10.
J Emerg Med ; 50(4): 560-6, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27016953

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Seventy-two-hour returns to the emergency department (ED) have been used to identify patients who are believed to have been more likely to have suffered medical errors, missed diagnoses, or failure or inadequacy of previous treatment or discharge planning. This approach has been criticized as arbitrary, however, citing the lack of evidence to support its homogenous application to all organ system-based complaints and the unclear implication of returns. OBJECTIVE: Given the significant burden of gastrointestinal (GI)-related illness, our objective was to determine if an audit of 72-hour returns of GI-related diagnoses appropriately captures patients who return with a concerning diagnosis (CD) on their second visit. METHODS: Ten emergency physicians were surveyed and a list of concerning, "not to be missed" diagnoses were generated. The demographic and clinical variables were collected and analyzed on all patients with a GI International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision code presenting to an urban, university-affiliated ED between July 2013 and March 2014. RESULTS: There were 10,012 patient visits during the study period, including 1006 patients (10%) with ≥ 1 return visits. One hundred forty-seven patients (15%) returned within 72 hours, and 859 patients (85%) returned in > 72 hours. Patients that returned within 72 hours were no more likely to have a CD than those that returned at a later time (13.6% vs. 14.4%; p = 0.79). CONCLUSION: An audit of 72-hour returns only captures a small percentage of patients that return with a CD, and these patients are at no greater risk of harboring a CD than those that return at a later date.


Subject(s)
Digestive System Diseases/therapy , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Health Care , Diagnostic Errors , Digestive System Diseases/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Male , Massachusetts , Medical Errors , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Failure
12.
Radiology ; 268(3): 779-89, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23801769

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To quantify interphysician variation in imaging use during emergency department (ED) visits and examine the contribution of factors to this variation at the patient, visit, and physician level. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was HIPAA compliant and approved by the institutional review board of Partners Healthcare System (Boston, Mass), with waiver of informed consent. In this retrospective study of 88 851 consecutive ED visits during 2011 at a large urban teaching hospital, a hierarchical logistic regression model was used to identify multiple predictors for the probability that low- or high-cost imaging would be ordered during a given visit. Physician-specific random effects were estimated to articulate (by odds ratio) and quantify (by intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]) interphysician variation. RESULTS: Patient- and visit-level factors found to be statistically significant predictors of imaging use included measures of ED busyness, prior ED visit, referral source to the ED, and ED arrival mode. Physician-level factors (eg, sex, years since graduation, annual workload, and residency training) did not correlate with imaging use. The remaining amount of interphysician variation was very low (ICC, 0.97% for low-cost imaging; ICC, 1.07% for high-cost imaging). These physician-specific odds ratios of imaging estimates were moderately reliable at 0.78 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77, 0.79) for low-cost imaging and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.74, 0.78) for high-cost imaging. CONCLUSION: After careful and comprehensive case-mix adjustment by using hierarchical logistic regression, only about 1% of the variability in ED imaging utilization was attributable to physicians.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Imaging/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Utilization Review , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Boston/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
13.
Am J Clin Pathol ; 132(3): 326-31, 2009 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19687307

ABSTRACT

Overcrowding and prolonged patient length-of-stay (LOS) in emergency departments (EDs) are growing problems. We evaluated the impact of implementing a rapid whole blood quantitative D-dimer test (Biosite Triage, Biosite Diagnostics, San Diego, CA) in our ED satellite laboratory on 252 patients before vs 211 patients after implementation. All patients also underwent testing with the existing central laboratory method (VIDAS D-dimer, bioMérieux, Durham, NC). D-dimer turnaround time (from blood draw to result) decreased approximately 79% (approximately 2 hours vs 25 minutes). The mean ED LOS declined from 8.46 to 7.14 hours (P = .016). Hospital admissions decreased 13.8%, ED discharges increased 7.3%, and the number of patients admitted for observation increased 6.4% (P = .005). No difference in the utilization of radiologic studies was observed (P = .86). At 3 months' follow-up, none of the after-implementation patients with negative D-dimer results were admitted for subsequent venous thromboembolic disease. The rapid D-dimer test was associated with a shorter ED LOS and fewer hospital admissions.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/analysis , Length of Stay , Venous Thromboembolism/blood , Academic Medical Centers , Blood Chemical Analysis/methods , Hospitals, Urban , Humans , Patient Admission , Point-of-Care Systems , Sensitivity and Specificity , Time Factors , Urban Health Services , Urban Population
14.
Clin Chim Acta ; 400(1-2): 120-2, 2009 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19000907

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) is one method to screen for colorectal cancer and to assess for gastrointestinal bleeding in hospitalized patients. Differences in the analytical sensitivity among various methods may have significant clinical repercussions. METHODS: We evaluated the analytical performance of 5 different FOBT methods (standard guaiac-based method and four immunochemical methods) using patient samples and spiked stool specimens. RESULTS: The analytical sensitivity measured using spiked stool samples varied from <8 to 1500 ug hemoglobin/gram of stool. In some cases the results differed significantly from the manufacturers reported analytical sensitivity. Analysis of 71 stool samples measured by all 5 methods showed a discrepant result in 31 cases (43.7%). The rate of positive samples varied by method from 8.5% to 42.2%. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate significant differences in the analytical performance among FOBT methods. Careful method validation and selection of a method with appropriate sensitivity is essential when choosing an FOBT method for colorectal cancer screening or for the assessment of gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department and hospital inpatients.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care , Clinical Chemistry Tests/methods , Guaiac , Hospitals , Occult Blood , Colonoscopy , Follow-Up Studies , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/diagnosis , Humans , Immunochemistry , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
15.
Am J Clin Pathol ; 129(5): 796-801, 2008 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18426741

ABSTRACT

We evaluated the impact of implementing a point-of-care (POC) rapid urine test panel for drugs of abuse on turnaround time (TAT), emergency department length of stay (LOS), and laboratory test utilization patterns. The mean TAT from sample collection to results reporting decreased by 69.4%, from 108 to 33 minutes, the mean LOS from 11.1 to 8.1 hours (27% P < .0001), and the median LOS from 8.0 to 7.0 hours (13% P = .0017). A method crossover between the POC and central laboratory methods revealed differences in sensitivity and specificity. Overall, there was no clear preference for either method. Differences in performance for individual drug classes were reconciled by providing interpretive comments with POC results. Following implementation, use of urine testing for drugs of abuse increased by 30%, which was offset by fewer requests for extended toxicology testing in the central laboratory and more selective ordering of toxicology tests not on the POC panel (alcohols and analgesics). The implementation of a POC urine test panel for drugs of abuse decreased LOS and TAT and essentially replaced central laboratory testing for drugs of abuse. Differences in sensitivity and specificity between POC and central laboratory results require provision of interpretive comments with results.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Services/methods , Illicit Drugs/urine , Point-of-Care Systems , Urinalysis/methods , Urinalysis/statistics & numerical data , Academic Medical Centers , Humans , Length of Stay , Sensitivity and Specificity , Substance-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Substance-Related Disorders/urine , Time
17.
Arch Pathol Lab Med ; 127(4): 456-60, 2003 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12683874

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Emergency department (ED) overcrowding has reached crisis proportions in the United States. Many hospitals are seeking to identify process reengineering efforts to reduce crowding and ED patient length of stay (LOS). OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of a point-of-care testing (POCT) satellite laboratory in the ED of a large academic medical center. SETTING: The ED of the Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass. DESIGN AND OUTCOME MEASURES: Evaluation of physician satisfaction, turnaround time (TAT), and ED LOS before and after implementation of a POCT laboratory. ED LOS was measured by patient chart audits. TAT was assessed by manual and computer audits. Clinician satisfaction surveys measured satisfaction with test TAT and test accuracy. RESULTS: Blood glucose, urine human chorionic gonadotropin, urine dipstick, creatine kinase-MB, and troponin tests were performed in the ED POCT laboratory. Test TAT declined an average of 87% after the institution of POCT. The ED LOS decreased for patients who received pregnancy testing, urine dipstick, and cardiac markers. Although these differences were not significant for individual tests, when the tests were combined, the decreased LOS was, on average, 41.3 minutes (P =.006). Clinician satisfaction surveys documented equivalent satisfaction with test accuracy between the central laboratory and the POCT laboratory. These surveys also documented dissatisfaction with central laboratory TAT and increased satisfaction with TAT of the POCT program (P <.001). CONCLUSIONS: The POCT satellite laboratory decreased test TAT and decreased ED LOS. There was excellent satisfaction with test accuracy and TAT.


Subject(s)
Academic Medical Centers/trends , Emergency Medical Services/trends , Laboratories, Hospital/trends , Length of Stay/trends , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/trends , Female , Humans , Male , Massachusetts , Middle Aged , Quality Assurance, Health Care/trends , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...