ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Handoffs between the operating room (OR) and post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) require a high volume and quality of information to be transferred. This study aimed to improve perioperative communication with a handoff tool. METHODS: Perioperative staff at a quaternary care center was surveyed regarding perception of handoff quality, and OR to PACU handoffs were observed for structured criteria. A 25-item tool was implemented, and handoffs were similarly observed. Staff was then again surveyed. A multidisciplinary team led this initiative as a collaboration. RESULTS: After implementation, nursing reported improved perception of time spent (2.63-3.68, p = .02) and amount of information discussed (2.85-3.73, p = .05). Anesthesia also reported improved personal communication (3.69-4.43, p = .004), effectiveness of handoffs (3.43-3.82, p = .02), and amount of information discussed (4.26-4.76, p = .05). After implementation, observed patient information discussed during handoffs increased for both surgical and anesthesia team members. The frequency of complete and near-complete handoffs increased (40%-74%, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: A structured handoff tool increased the amount of essential information reported during handoffs between the OR and PACU and increased team members' perception of handoffs.
Subject(s)
Operating Rooms , Patient Handoff , Humans , Patient Handoff/standards , Operating Rooms/organization & administration , Operating Rooms/standards , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Communication , Quality Improvement , Surveys and Questionnaires , Recovery Room/organization & administrationABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To analyze differences in health confidence levels regarding discharge instructions between two groups of same-day surgery patients. DESIGN: Comparative and descriptive design. METHODS: Phone surveys to two groups: those who received follow-up phone calls from a registered nurse (RN) and those who received standard care instructions at discharge only. FINDINGS: In 74 same-day surgery patients (n = 37 per group), all participants expressed high health confidence in implementing discharge instructions. Results revealed no higher health confidence levels in patients who received RN follow-up phone calls, no difference between groups attending postoperative appointments, and no relationships between subject demographics, health confidence level, and postoperative complications between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The use of specialized RNs to conduct postoperative phone calls may not be cost effective. When RNs provide excellent instructions to patients in person, it may lead to sufficient patient health confidence. Personal and nurse-provided education should be considered a standard, and the outcomes of costly follow-up phone calls should be examined.
Subject(s)
Patient Discharge , Telephone , Appointments and Schedules , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To determine if end-tidal carbon dioxide (etCO2) value increased nurses' perceptions of confidence in patients' readiness for postanesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge. DESIGN: Prospective, cross-sectional, comparative, one-group (pre-post) design. METHODS: Nurses completed 2 assessments of confidence in readiness for discharge, before and after etCO2 monitoring. Patient (discharge pain level, body mass index, sleep apnea history, and opioid use) and nurse factors were assessed. Analyses included descriptive and comparative statistics. FINDINGS: Of 133 patients, mean (standard deviation) etCO2 was 36.1 (5.7) mm Hg. Nurses' confidence in readiness for discharge differed before and after etCO2 assessment. Confidence score decreased when etCO2 was low (P = .003) or high (P = .005), compared with normal values. In linear regression, etCO2 remained a factor in nurses' confidence in readiness for discharge (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In a PACU, etCO2 monitoring changed nurses' perceptions of confidence in patients' readiness for discharge.
Subject(s)
Capnography/standards , Carbon Dioxide/analysis , Nurses/psychology , Patient Discharge/standards , Self Efficacy , Adult , Capnography/methods , Capnography/psychology , Carbon Dioxide/blood , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Nurses/statistics & numerical data , Ohio , Patient Discharge/statistics & numerical data , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate differences in the shared decision-making perceptions of clinical nurses between initial implementation of a shared governance model and perceptions 3 years later after the model has matured. BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making empowers nurses to have a voice in their practice and supports engagement and retention. METHODS: A prospective, 2-group comparative design was conducted using the Index of Professional Nursing Governance, a validated, reliable tool. After comparing data univariately, a multivariable linear regression model was used to evaluate the impact of nurse characteristics on shared decision-making responses. RESULTS: Mean overall shared decision-making score (P = .23) and domain scores (P values between .055 and .63) did not increase in 2015 compared with 2012. After adjusting for differences in nurse characteristics between groups, overall score (P = .017) and 3 of 6 domain scores improved: professional control of work, structures for decisions and access to information (all P values between .005 and .031). CONCLUSION: As shared governance became established, shared decision-making scores increased.
