ABSTRACT
These studies were conducted to determine subchronic toxicity and genotoxicity of the biocide diiodomethyl-p-tolysulfone (DIMPTS) in rats and dogs. Male and female Sprague-Dawley rats and Beagle dogs were administered DIMPTS for 90-days via the diet at 0, 5, 20, and 80 mg/kg/day to rats and via capsules at 0, 2, 10, and 60 mg/kg/day to dogs. In rats, the only treatment-related finding was squamous metaplasia of the salivary gland duct in the 80 mg/kg/day group. In dogs, female body weights in the high-dose group were significantly lower than controls. Altered clinical pathology parameters were considered secondary to inflammatory changes observed in some of the dogs. Treatment-related alterations were found in the thyroid glands, salivary glands, GI-tract in the mid- and/or high-dose groups. DIMPTS was negative in the four in vitro and one in vivo genotoxicity assays. The toxicological effects noted in the two mammalian species are consistent with the principal toxic effects of iodine, and are proposed to arise from release of iodide from the DIMPTS molecule with toxic sequelae.
Subject(s)
Benzene Derivatives/administration & dosage , Benzene Derivatives/toxicity , Sulfones/administration & dosage , Sulfones/toxicity , Toxicity Tests, Subchronic/methods , Animals , Animals, Laboratory , CHO Cells , Cricetinae , Cricetulus , Dogs , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred ICR , Mutagenicity Tests/methods , Random Allocation , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Salivary Gland Neoplasms/chemically induced , Salivary Gland Neoplasms/pathologyABSTRACT
There are currently available no systematic experimental data on the skin sensitizing properties of acrylates that are of relevance in occupational settings. Limited information from previous guinea-pig tests or from the local lymph node assay (LLNA) is available; however, these data are incomplete and somewhat contradictory. For those reasons, we have examined in the LLNA 4 acrylates: butyl acrylate (BA), ethyl acrylate (EA), methyl acrylate (MA), and ethylhexyl acrylate (EHA). The LLNA data indicated that all 4 compounds have some potential to cause skin sensitization. In addition, the relative potencies of these acrylates were measured by derivation from LLNA dose-response analyses of EC3 values (the effective concentration of chemical required to induce a threefold increase in proliferation of draining lymph node cells compared with control values). On the basis of 1 scheme for the categorization of skin sensitization potency, BA, EA, and MA were each classified as weak sensitizers. Using the same scheme, EHA was considered a moderate sensitizer. However, it must be emphasized that the EC3 value for this chemical of 9.7% is on the borderline between moderate (<10%) and weak (>10%) categories. Thus, the judicious view is that all 4 chemicals possess relatively weak skin sensitizing potential.
