Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 99(5): 548-54, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26715217

ABSTRACT

Currently, patient preference studies are not required to be included in marketing authorization applications to regulatory authorities, and the role and methodology for such studies have not been agreed upon. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) conducted a pilot study to gain experience on how the collection of individual preferences can inform the regulatory review. Using a short online questionnaire, ordinal statements regarding the desirability of different outcomes in the treatment of advanced cancer were elicited from 139 participants (98 regulators, 29 patient or carers, and 12 healthcare professionals). This was followed by face-to-face meetings to gather feedback and validate the individual responses. In this article we summarize the EMA pilot study and discuss the role of patient preference studies within the regulatory review. Based on the results, we conclude that our preference elicitation instrument was easy to implement and sufficiently precise to learn about the distribution of the participants' individual preferences.


Subject(s)
Decision Making , Drug Design , Drug and Narcotic Control/methods , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Patient Preference , Caregivers/psychology , European Union , Humans , Neoplasms/psychology , Pilot Projects , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...