Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 75(7): 473-481, 2018 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29572316

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The considerations that leaders of multihospital health systems must take into account in developing and implementing initiatives to build and maintain an exceptional pharmacy workforce are described. SUMMARY: Significant changes that require constant individual and organizational learning are occurring throughout healthcare and within the profession of pharmacy. These considerations include understanding why it is important to have a succession plan and determining what types of education and training are important to support that plan. Other considerations include strategies for leveraging learners, dealing with a large geographic footprint, adjusting training opportunities to accommodate the ever-evolving demands on pharmacy staffs in terms of skill mix, and determining ways to either budget for or internally develop content for staff development. All of these methods are critically important to ensuring an optimized workforce. Especially for large health systems operating multiple sites across large distances, the use of technology-enabled solutions to provide effective delivery of programming to multiple sites is critical. Commonly used tools include live webinars, live "telepresence" programs, prerecorded programming that is available through an on-demand repository, and computer-based training modules. A learning management system is helpful to assign and document completion of educational requirements, especially those related to regulatory requirements (e.g., controlled substances management, sterile and nonsterile compounding, competency assessment). CONCLUSION: Creating and sustaining an environment where all pharmacy caregivers feel invested in and connected to ongoing learning is a powerful motivator for performance, engagement, and retention.


Subject(s)
Learning , Multi-Institutional Systems/organization & administration , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Workforce , Clinical Competence , Computer-Assisted Instruction/methods , Humans , Leadership , Staff Development/methods , Technology, Pharmaceutical/organization & administration
3.
J Fluency Disord ; 30(4): 319-35, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16246409

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Medications with dopamine antagonist properties, such as haloperidol, and those with serotonin reuptake inhibitor properties, such as clomipramine, have been shown to improve fluency. To examine the degree to which each of these two pharmacological mechanisms might independently affect fluency, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, paroxetine, and a selective dopamine (D-2) antagonist, pimozide, were evaluated. Both types of medications also affect mood and anxiety, factors that could influence fluency levels. Therefore, we also evaluated the medications' effects on generalized and speech-related anxiety and the relationships between changes in anxiety and changes in fluency in 11 subjects with a history of developmental stuttering. The randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled crossover study that was designed had to be terminated prior to completion due to severe side effects following withdrawal from paroxetine. Even with a reduced sample size (n=6), significant improvement in percent fluent speaking time (p=0.02) was found using a telephone task between baseline and pimozide (n=6), with average duration of dysfluencies significantly shorter (p=0.04) but no significant difference in the estimated number of dysfluencies per minute. This significant improvement was associated with non-significant increases in generalized anxiety, but non-significant decreases in speech-related anxiety. No significant differences were found in fluency between baseline and paroxetine (n=5). These preliminary results suggest that fluency improvement is more likely to be mediated by dopaminergic rather than serotonergic mechanisms. Due to its side effects, however, pimozide may be considered a risk for treatment of stuttering. EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES: As a result of reading this paper the reader will describe and explain: (1) how medications may affect fluency and the rationale for selecting medications for treatment trials; (2) the interrelationship between fluency and anxiety; and (3) factors important in developing clinical trials using medications.


Subject(s)
Anxiety , Dopamine Antagonists/therapeutic use , Paroxetine/therapeutic use , Pimozide/therapeutic use , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Stuttering/drug therapy , Verbal Behavior/drug effects , Adult , Cross-Over Studies , Dopamine Antagonists/pharmacology , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Paroxetine/adverse effects , Paroxetine/pharmacology , Pimozide/pharmacology , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/adverse effects , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/pharmacology , Stuttering/physiopathology , Stuttering/psychology , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...