Pain intensity and pain self-management strategies following discharge after surgery: An Australian prospective observational study.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Up to 80% of patients experience acute pain following surgery. This study aimed to improve the current understanding about the strategies individuals use to self-manage pain following discharge after surgery, stratified by pain intensity. METHODS: A prospective observational study conducted at the Royal Hobart Hospital, Australia, between November 2014 and March 2015. Eligible participants were 18 years or older and had undergone surgery requiring an incision. Patients who had undergone surgery related to cancer, childbirth or multitrauma or those with dementia were excluded. Participants were identified through hospital records and mailed a survey within 1 week of discharge. This survey asked about post-discharge pain, management strategies utilized and advice on self-management of pain provided during their inpatient stay. RESULTS: Five hundred surveys were mailed, with 169 (33.8%) being returned. The median age of the respondents was 57 years (range: 18-92 years); 53% were female. The majority (89.3%) of participants recalled receiving information about pain self-management. Analgesic use was reported by 95.4% of participants in the week following discharge. Moderate-severe pain was reported by 80 participants (47.3%); 63.7% and 11.3% of patients reported underuse and overuse of analgesics compared to what was recommended, respectively. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: A high proportion of patients underused analgesics despite experiencing moderate-severe pain. Although the vast majority of participants reported receiving advice regarding pain self-management, this did not appear to translate into optimal pain management after discharge. Different approaches to the provision of advice appear to be required.

Home medicines reviews in Australian war veterans taking warfarin do not influence international normalised ratio control.

BACKGROUND: The clinical outcomes of warfarin are largely dependent on the international normalised ratio (INR) control achieved, and strategies to improve the time in therapeutic range (TTR) should be identified and widely implemented in practice. AIMS: To investigate the influence of pharmacist-led medication reviews on INR control and observe the quality of INR control in Australian veterans who take warfarin. METHODS: We undertook a retrospective cohort study using administrative claims data for Australian veterans and war-widows identified by the Department of Veterans' Affairs who were regularly dispensed warfarin and invited them to contact the research team. Pathology providers were subsequently contacted to provide INR results. RESULTS: INR data were available for 344 of 818 (42.1%) veterans who consented to participate in the study; 64.4% were male and the median age was 83 years. The overall TTR for the veteran cohort during the study period was 64.0%. There was no difference in the TTR in the 6 months following home medicines review (HMR) compared with the control group (63.0% vs 67.0%, P = 0.27), with the TTR in patients with INR data available in the 6 months prior to, and the 6 months following HMR, remaining high (67.9% vs 69.6% P = 0.63). Approximately, one-third of veterans in this study had a percentage TTR below 60%. CONCLUSIONS: INR was well-controlled in this elderly cohort, comparable to that achieved in recent randomised trials involving warfarin. Pharmacist-led medication reviews were not associated with a change in INR control.

A multifaceted pharmacist intervention to improve antihypertensive adherence: a cluster-randomized, controlled trial (HAPPy trial).

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVES: About half of all patients taking antihypertensives discontinue treatment by 12 months. There is potential for substantial health gains at both individual and population levels through improved treatment adherence. The objective was to evaluate a community pharmacist intervention to improve adherence with antihypertensive medicines with a view to improving blood pressure (BP) control. DESIGN: prospective, non-blinded, cluster-randomized, controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS: adults with primary hypertension who obtained antihypertensives in the previous 6 months. Patients with poor refill adherence were preferentially identified with the help of a purpose-built software application. INTERVENTION: package comprising BP monitor; training on BP self-monitoring; motivational interviewing; medication use review; prescription refill reminders. FOLLOW-UP: six months. PRIMARY OUTCOME: change in proportion self-reporting medication adherence. Secondary outcome: BP changes. RESULTS: Participants (n = 395; intervention - 207; control - 188) had a mean age of 66.7 years; 51.1% were males. The proportion of adherent participants increased in both groups but was not significantly different between groups [57·2% to 63·6% (control) vs. 60·0% to 73·5% (intervention), P = 0·23]. The mean reduction in systolic BP was significantly greater in the intervention group (10·0 mmHg vs. 4·6 mmHg; P = 0·05). The proportion of patients who were non-adherent at baseline and adherent at 6 months was 22·6% (95%CI 5·1-40·0%) higher in the intervention group (61·8% vs. 39·2%, P = 0·007). Among participants with baseline BP above target, reduction of systolic BP was significantly greater in the intervention group [by 7·2 mmHg (95%CI 1·6-12·8 mmHg); (P = 0·01)]. Among participants non-adherent at baseline and above target BP, the proportion reporting adherence at 6 months was significantly greater in the intervention group [56·8% vs. 35·9%, P = 0·039). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: This community pharmacist intervention resulted in improved adherence to antihypertensive medication and reduced systolic BP.

Thromboprophylaxis following hip and knee arthroplasty.

AIM: To determine local thromboprophylaxis prescribing practices following arthroplasty. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 300 consecutive hip and knee arthroplasty patients (150 each) over a 2-year period at Tasmania's major public hospital. The provision of thromboprophylaxis, the presence of bleeding/thrombotic risk factors and the prevalence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) and major bleeding occurring within 90 days postoperatively were documented. RESULTS: The mean age of the 300 patients (169 females, 131 males) was 68.7 years (standard deviation 10.4). Only 11.3% of knee arthroplasty and 16.7% of hip arthroplasty inpatients had mechanical thromboprophylaxis documented during their stay. All inpatients received pharmacological thromboprophylaxis, predominantly injectable anticoagulants (98.4%). Only 36.5% continued to receive pharmacological thromboprophylaxis following discharge, predominantly an antiplatelet agent (55.5%). The 90-day incidence of symptomatic VTE was 2.7% (95% confidence interval: 1.0-5.0%); 4.0% (95% confidence interval: 1.0-8.0%) for knees and 1.3% (95% confidence interval: 0-5.0%) for hips. The in-hospital and post-discharge VTE incidence was 0.7% and 2.0% respectively. All readmissions for VTE occurred within 1 month of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: While inpatient thromboprophylaxis was routine, it generally was not continued on discharge, potentially leaving many patients exposed to a higher risk of VTE. Most cases of symptomatic VTE occurred after discharge, with the majority requiring readmission to hospital under medical units.Within the limitations of a retrospective study, these findings suggest a need for further research and discussion regarding what constitutes appropriate thromboprophylaxis (type, agent and duration) following hip or knee arthroplasty.

Warfarin management after discharge from hospital: a qualitative analysis.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Warfarin is recognized as a high-risk medication for adverse events, and the risks are particularly heightened in the period immediately following a patient's discharge from hospital. This qualitative study aimed to explore the experiences of Australian patients and healthcare professionals of warfarin management in the post-discharge period and identify the benefits and deficiencies of existing systems, to inform the development of a model for a new collaborative post-discharge warfarin management service. METHODS: Healthcare professionals, professional organization representatives and patients recently discharged from hospital taking warfarin (consumers) were recruited via purposive, criterion-based sampling within two Australian states. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted between August and October 2008 using standard discussion guides. Data were manually analyzed to identify emergent themes using a phenomenological approach. RESULTS: Forty-seven participants were involved in the telephone interviews. Three major themes emerged: (i) appropriate warfarin education is integral to effective warfarin management, (ii) problems occur in communication along the continuum of care and (iii) home-delivered services are valuable to both patients and healthcare professionals. DISCUSSION: Although high-quality warfarin education and effective communication at the hospital-community interface were identified as important in post-discharge warfarin management, deficiencies were perceived within current systems. The role of home-delivered services in ensuring timely follow-up and promoting continuity of care was recognized. Previous studies exploring anticoagulation management in other settings have identified similar themes. Post-discharge management should therefore focus on providing patients with a solid foundation to minimize future problems. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Addressing the three identified facets of care within a new, collaborative post-discharge warfarin management service may address the perceived deficiencies in existing systems. Improvements may result in the short- and longer-term health outcomes of patients discharged from hospital taking warfarin, including a reduction in their risk of adverse events.

Evaluation of antithrombotic usage for atrial fibrillation in aged care facilities.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Warfarin is an important drug for the prevention of thromboembolic events such as stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, it is commonly implicated in major adverse drug events, which may result in reluctance to prescribe warfarin, especially in the institutionalised elderly population. This study aimed to assess the current trends in the antithrombotic management of AF in aged care facilities (ACFs) in Tasmania, Australia, and to compare this with current recommendations. METHODS: We performed a non-experimental, retrospective cohort study designed to evaluate antithrombotic usage for AF in ACF residents in Tasmania. Residents with AF were identified on a patient-by-patient basis from residential case-note summaries collected from 29 of the 64 ACFs in Tasmania. The CHADS-2 score and the presence or absence of documented contraindications were used to determine the appropriateness of the current antithrombotic therapy prescribed. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Fifteen per cent (262/1737) of the ACF residents were diagnosed with AF. Nine per cent of the residents with AF had a contraindication to antithrombotic therapy (either warfarin or antiplatelet therapy). Eighty-one per cent of residents were eligible for treatment with warfarin according to the CHADS-2 score and did not appear to have a contraindication to warfarin. Of these, only 38% were prescribed warfarin; 16% (40/255) did not receive any antithrombotic treatment, despite being eligible for treatment with warfarin or antiplatelet therapy. Residents who did not receive any antithrombotic treatment or who received antiplatelet treatment were significantly older than those treated with anticoagulants. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that antithrombotic therapy, particularly warfarin, is underused in ACF-dwelling elderly patients who are eligible for treatment.

Improving the outcomes of anticoagulation in rural Australia: an evaluation of pharmacist-assisted monitoring of warfarin therapy.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this project was to assess whether rural pharmacist involvement in the management of patients receiving warfarin has the potential to lead to safer and more effective anticoagulation, and is valued and welcomed by patients and their general practitioners (GPs). METHODS: A convenience sample of rural pharmacists was trained in the use of the CoaguChek S International Normalized Ratio (INR) monitor and then conducted pharmacy-based testing for approximately 3 months. Two types of testing were performed in the pharmacy: (i) comparison testing was defined as pharmacy-based tests taken within 4 h of conventional laboratory testing or (ii) additional testing, which was a pharmacy-based test with no direct comparison laboratory test taken. Pharmacists, GPs and patients completed anonymous satisfaction surveys after the completion of the pharmacy-based testing. RESULTS: Pharmacists from 16 rural pharmacies were trained to use the CoaguChek S monitor. During the trial period, 518 INR tests were performed in the pharmacies on 137 different patients. A total of 120 tests were evaluated against results from laboratory testing. The pharmacy-based INR values were significantly correlated with the laboratory INR values (mean of 2.32+/-0.77 and 2.32+/-0.59 respectively; r=0.88, P<0.0001). A total of 398 additional pharmacy-based tests were conducted in the pharmacy and 8.5% of the additional tests resulted in a subsequent dosage change. The monitoring was well received by pharmacists, GPs and patients. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the trial were very positive. The CoaguChek S monitor in pharmacy-based testing performed accurately compared with conventional laboratory testing. Further research needs to be conducted on the impact of community pharmacy-conducted INR monitoring on patient care and outcomes.

Accuracy, reproducibility and clinical utility of the CoaguChek S portable international normalized ratio monitor in an outpatient anticoagulation clinic.

The accuracy and reproducibility of the CoaguChek S, and its clinical agreement with conventional laboratory international normalized ratio (INR) determination, were evaluated in an outpatient anticoagulation clinic setting. Forty-three patients provided 248 paired INR measurements for analysis. The paired results were highly correlated (r = 0.90). The mean coefficient of variation for the CoaguChek S for a random sample of 21 patients with three repeated tests each, was 4%. Clinical applicability was also measured by discrepant INR values, as defined in the literature by expanded and narrow agreement, and by INR values resulting in a different clinical decision by a blinded haematology registrar. Expanded agreement and narrow agreement between the two INR values occurred 90 and 88% of the time, respectively. The stricter criteria set down by the clinician resulted in 73% of paired results producing the same dosage decision. The CoaguChek S displayed good correlation with laboratory determination of INR and compared relatively well with expanded and narrow clinical agreement criteria.