Five-Year Followup Results of a Prospective, Multicenter Study of Patients with Overactive Bladder Treated with Sacral Neuromodulation.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the therapeutic success rate, changes in quality of life and safety of sacral neuromodulation 5 years after InterStim™ implantation. Included in study were subjects with bothersome symptoms of overactive bladder, including urinary urge incontinence and/or urgency-frequency, in whom at least 1 anticholinergic medication failed and 1 medication had not been tried. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Therapeutic success was defined as a urinary urge incontinence or urgency-frequency response of 50% or greater improvement in average leaks or voids per day, or return to normal voiding, defined as fewer than 8 voids per day. Quality of life was evaluated by ICIQ-OABqol (International Consultation on Incontinence Modular Questionnaire). Safety was evaluated through adverse events. RESULTS: Of the 340 subjects who completed the test stimulation 272 had an implant, of whom 91% were female. Mean age was 57 years. At baseline 202 subjects with urinary urge incontinence had a mean ± SD of 3.1 ± 2.7 leaks per day and 189 with urgency-frequency had a mean of 12.6 ± 4.5 voids per day. The 5-year therapeutic success rate was 67% (95% CI 60-74) using modified completers analysis and 82% (95% CI 76-88) using completers analysis. Subjects with urinary urge incontinence had a mean reduction from baseline of 2.0 ± 2.2 leaks per day and subjects with urgency-frequency had a mean reduction of 5.4 ± 4.3 voids per day (each completers analysis p <0.0001). Subjects showed improvement in all ICIQ-OABqol measures (p <0.0001). The most common device related adverse events were an undesirable change in stimulation in 60 of the 272 subjects (22%), implant site pain in 40 (15%) and therapeutic product ineffectiveness in 36 (13%). CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter study shows that sacral neuromodulation had sustained efficacy and quality of life improvements, and an acceptable safety profile through 5 years in subjects with overactive bladder.

Results of a prospective, multicenter study evaluating quality of life, safety, and efficacy of sacral neuromodulation at twelve months in subjects with symptoms of overactive bladder.

AIMS: This prospective, multicenter post-approval study evaluated the success rate of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) with the InterStim® System at 12-months. Subjects with bothersome symptoms of overactive bladder (OAB) including urinary urge incontinence (UI) or urgency-frequency (UF), who failed at least one anticholinergic medication and had at least one not tried were included. METHODS: Subjects with successful test stimulation received an SNM implant. Therapeutic success (≥50% improvement in average leaks/day or voids/day or a return to normal voiding frequency [<8 voids/day]) and quality of life through 12 months were evaluated for implanted subjects. RESULTS: Of the 340 subjects that went through test stimulation, 272 were implanted with SNM. Of these, 91% were female, mean age was 57, UI subjects had 3.1 ± 2.7 leaks/day, UF subjects had 12.6 ± 4.5 voids/day. The analysis which includes all implanted subjects with diary data at baseline and 12 months showed an OAB therapeutic success rate of 85% at 12 months. UI subjects had a mean reduction of 2.2 ± 2.7 leaks/day; UF subjects had a mean reduction of 5.1 ± 4.1 voids/day (both P < 0.0001). Subjects showed significant improvement from baseline in all measures of ICIQ-OABqol (all P < 0.0001). 80% of subjects reported improved changes in their urinary symptom interference at 12 months. Device-related adverse events occurred in 16% (56/340) of subjects during test stimulation and 30% (82/272) of subjects post-implant. CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter study shows SNM is safe and effective and results in improved outcomes through 12 months in subjects with OAB symptoms, without requiring failure of all medications.

Results of a prospective, randomized, multicenter study evaluating sacral neuromodulation with InterStim therapy compared to standard medical therapy at 6-months in subjects with mild symptoms of overactive bladder.

AIMS: This prospective, randomized, multicenter trial evaluated the 6-month success rate of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) with InterStim® Therapy versus standard medical therapy (SMT) for overactive bladder (OAB). METHODS: Enrolled subjects discontinued OAB medications prior to and during baseline data collection and were randomized 1:1 to SNM or SMT. Subjects had bothersome symptoms of overactive bladder (OAB) including urinary urge incontinence (≥2 leaks/72 hr) and/or urgency-frequency (≥8 voids/day). Subjects failed at least one anticholinergic medication, and had at least one medication not yet attempted. The primary objective was to compare OAB therapeutic success rate at 6 months between SNM and SMT. RESULTS: Overall, 147 subjects were randomized (70 to SNM and 77 to SMT); 93% were female and mean age was 58. The primary intent to treat analysis showed OAB therapeutic success was significantly greater in the SNM group (61%) than the SMT group (42%; P = 0.02). In the as treated analysis, OAB therapeutic success was 76% for SNM and 49% for SMT (P = 0.002). The SNM group showed significant improvements in quality of life versus the SMT group (all P < 0.001) and 86% of SNM subjects reported improved or greatly improved urinary symptom interference score at 6 months, compared to 44% for SMT subjects. The device-related adverse event rate was 30.5% and the medication-related adverse event rate was 27.3%. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates superior objective and subjective success of SNM compared to SMT. SNM is shown to be a safe and effective treatment for OAB patients with mild to moderate symptoms. Neurourol. Urodynam. 34:224-230, 2015. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Prospective comparison of discrimination algorithms to prevent inappropriate ICD therapy: primary results of the Rhythm ID Going Head to Head Trial.

BACKGROUND: Inappropriate therapy for supraventricular arrhythmias remains a significant source of morbidity in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) recipients. OBJECTIVE: The Rhythm ID Goes Head to Head Trial (RIGHT) was designed to compare rhythm discrimination and inappropriate therapies among patients with ICDs from 2 manufacturers. METHODS: Patients with standard ICD indications were randomized to receive a Guidant VITALITY 2 with Rhythm ID or selective Medtronic pulse generators using the Enhanced PR Logic or Wavelet discrimination algorithms. A single- or dual-chamber device was implanted based on clinical indications and programmed in 2 detection zones with detection enhancements enabled for rates between 150 and 200 bpm. Algorithm performance was compared between randomization groups, stratified by single or dual chamber, for the primary end point of first inappropriate therapy (shock or antitachycardia pacing) for supraventricular arrhythmias. RESULTS: There were 1962 patients enrolled and followed for 18.3 ± 9.2 months, with no difference in all-cause mortality between groups. There were 3973 treated episodes where electrograms were available and adjudicated. The primary end point of inappropriate therapy occurred in 246 of 985 VITALITY 2 patients vs 187 of 977 specific Medtronic ICD patients (hazard ratio = 1.34; confidence interval = 1.11-1.62; P = .003). Differences in inappropriate therapy were confined to single-chamber ICDs. Inappropriate shocks were more frequent in VITALITY 2 ICDs (hazard ratio = 1.63; confidence interval = 1.29-2.06; P < .001), with most therapies and performance differences occurring at slower rhythms (rates < 175 bpm). CONCLUSION: Rhythm discrimination performed better in the specific Medtronic than in VITALITY 2 ICDs evaluated, particularly for single-chamber devices. Inappropriate therapies, and differences in performance, may be reduced with the use of rate cutoff above 175 bpm.

Arrhythmia rate distribution and tachyarrhythmia therapy in an ICD population: results from the INTRINSIC RV trial.

BACKGROUND: Appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy for ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) depends, in part, on the programming of tachycardia zones. OBJECTIVE: We assessed events treated with ICD shocks or antitachycardia pacing (ATP) in the Inhibition of Unnecessary RV Pacing with AV Search Hysteresis in ICDs (INTRINSIC RV) trial. METHODS: ATP and shock episodes from 1530 patients with dual-chamber ICDs were analyzed. RESULTS: For episodes in which electrograms were stored and adjudicated, ATP was delivered for 763 episodes (182 patients), shock-only was delivered for 300 episodes (146 patients), and shock following ATP was delivered for 81 episodes (56 patients). ATP was delivered appropriately for 507 episodes (130 patients), with 93% success, and inappropriately for 256 episodes (89 patients). For ATP episodes, appropriate (VT: 170 ± 28 bpm) and inappropriate (not VT: 165 ± 21 bpm) rates did not differ (P = .16). When the initial therapy was shock, onset rates were higher for appropriate therapy than for inappropriate therapy (224 ± 46 bpm vs 187 ± 31 bpm; P <.001). Inappropriate ATP was more likely to be followed by a shock (odds ratio 2.49; 95% confidence interval 1.56-3.97; P <.001). Fifty-eight percent (225 of 381) of shocked episodes had rates <200 bpm. For episodes between 200 and 250 bpm, 20% (23 of 113) were polymorphic VT or VF, 59% were monomorphic VT, 19% were supraventricular, and <1% was artifact. For episodes >250 bpm, 37% were VF, 28% polymorphic VT, 23% monomorphic VT, 7% supraventricular, and 5% artifact. CONCLUSIONS: In a general ICD population, ATP treated VT effectively or obviated the need for shock. Most ventricular arrhythmias <250 bpm were not VF. Proper zone programming may identify and treat VT without shock.

Device diagnostics and long-term clinical outcome in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy.

AIMS: This retrospective analysis sought to develop and validate a model using the measured diagnostic variables in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices to predict mortality. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data used in this analysis came from two CRT studies: Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Registry Evaluating Patient Response with RENEWAL Family Devices (CRT RENEWAL) (n = 436) and Heart Failure-Heart Rate Variability (HF-HRV) (n = 838). Patients from CRT RENEWAL were used to create a model for risk of death using logistic regression and to create a scoring system that could be used to predict mortality. Results of both the logistic regression and the clinical risk score were validated in a cohort of patients from the HF-HRV study. Diagnostics significantly improved over time post-CRT implant (all P < 0.001) and were correlated with a trend of decreased risk of death. The regression model classified CRT RENEWAL patients into low (2.8%), moderate (6.9%), and high (13.8%) risk of death based on tertiles of their model predicted risk. The clinical risk score classified CRT RENEWAL patients into low (2.8%), moderate (10.1%), and high (13.4%) risk of death based on tertiles of their score. When both the regression model and the clinical risk score were applied to the HF-HRV study, each was able to classify patients into appropriate levels of risk. CONCLUSION: Device diagnostics may be used to create models that predict the risk of death.

A randomized trial of the effect of automated ventricular capture on device longevity and threshold measurement in pacemaker patients.

BACKGROUND: An automatic capture (AC) algorithm adjusts ventricular pacing output to capture the ventricle while optimizing output to 0.5 V above threshold. AC maintains this output and confirms capture on a beat-to-beat basis in bipolar and unipolar pacing and sensing. OBJECTIVE: To assess the AC algorithm and its impact on device longevity. METHODS: Patients implanted with a pacemaker were randomized 1:1 to have the AC feature on or off for 12 months. Two threshold tests were conducted at each visit- automatic threshold and manual threshold. Average ventricular voltage output and projected device longevity were compared between AC on and off using nonparametric tests. RESULTS: Nine hundred ten patients were enrolled and underwent device implantation. Average ventricular voltage output was 1.6 V for the AC on arm (n = 444) and 3.1 V for the AC off arm (n = 446) (P < 0.001). Projected device longevity was 10.3 years for AC on and 8.9 years for AC off (P < 0.0001), or a 16% increase in longevity for AC on. The proportion of patients in whom there was a difference between automatic threshold and manual threshold of

Clinical and electrical performance of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene-covered defibrillator leads in comparison to traditional leads.

BACKGROUND: In the event of infection, erosion, or failure, fibrosis of a defibrillation lead can make extraction difficult. In the ENDOTAK RELIANCE G defibrillation lead, coils are covered with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) to prevent tissue ingrowth. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the REFLEx Study was to evaluate if RELIANCE G defibrillation leads with ePTFE-covered coils are as good as comparative defibrillation leads with respect to electrical performance and termination of spontaneous tachyarrhythmias. METHODS: Patients were randomized to type of defibrillation lead--Guidant RELIANCE G lead or a non-ePTFE-covered lead of choice. Electrical performance success was defined as meeting all minimum standards in the respective manufacturer's manual for amplitude, threshold, and impedance. A noninferiority margin of 5% was prespecified. RESULTS: Electrical performance success at 12 months was 93.0% (280/301) for RELIANCE G and 94.5% (291/308) for comparative leads. The performance success rate for RELIANCE G did not differ significantly from study comparative (P = 0.04, noninferiority). For spontaneous episodes, first shock conversion success rate was 90% for RELIANCE G and 95% for study comparative (P = 0.89, noninferiority). Implant conversion testing was successful in 96.7% (524/542) of RELIANCE G patients and 94.3% (512/543) of comparative patients (chi-square P-value = 0.0784). About 55% (609/1115) of patients completed follow-up through month 12. CONCLUSION: Data from the REFLEx study indicate that ePTFE-covered leads are not inferior to comparative leads with respect to electrical performance and implant conversion testing. We cannot conclude that the first shock conversion efficacy of ePTFE covered leads was statistically noninferior to comparative leads.