Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Surg ; 185(3): 183-7, 2003 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12620552

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Carotid artery stent placement (CAS) is becoming more popular among various specialties for the treatment of primary and recurrent carotid artery disease. The morbidity associated with this procedure is improving but the intermediate- and long-term follow-up remains unknown. We report our restenosis rates and follow-up associated with CAS. METHODS: Thirty-one interventions on 29 patients from May 1998 to January 2002 were reviewed. All patients have undergone serial follow-up using Doppler ultrasound at 3 and 6 months and every 6 months thereafter. Ten interventions (32%) were performed on patients with recurrent carotid artery disease and 21 (68%) on patients with primary disease. RESULTS: Five periprocedural complications occurred (transient ischemic attack, n = 3; major stroke, n = 1; immediate intrastent restenosis requiring lysis, n = 1) for a total immediate complication rate of 16%. No deaths occurred. Follow-up was achieved in all 29 patients (mean 28 months; range 20 to 46). Twenty-seven patients (29 vessels; 94%) remain asymptomatic with less than 50% stenosis. Two vessels (6%) have been found to have a critical restenosis of greater than 90%. Both patients were symptomatic from their recurrence (transient ischemic attack, n = 1; acute stroke, n = 1). Cumulative major stroke and death rate including all follow-up was 6%. CONCLUSIONS: CAS can be performed with an acceptable stroke/death rate (3%) in a properly selected patient population. In our small series of patients, the restenosis rate at a mean of 28 months after CAS is 6%.


Subject(s)
Carotid Stenosis/therapy , Stents , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Angioplasty, Balloon/adverse effects , Carotid Stenosis/mortality , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Ischemic Attack, Transient/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Recurrence , Stents/adverse effects , Stroke/etiology
2.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 16(1): 43-9, 2002 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11904803

ABSTRACT

In this prospective, nonrandomized study, we compared outcome with percutaneous femoral artery closure to that with open femoral arteriotomy in 95 patients who underwent endovascular AAA repair. Devices were introduced using 22 Fr and/or 16 Fr sheaths. The 8 Fr/10 Fr Perclose devices (Perclose Inc., Redwood City, CA) were used in an off-label "preclose technique." Thirty-three patients had bilateral open femoral arteriotomies, 44 patients had bilateral attempted percutaneous closure, and 18 patients had open femoral arteriotomy on one side and attempted percutaneous closure on the other side. Percutaneous closure was successful in 85% (47/55) of 16 Fr sheaths and 64% (29/45) of 22 Fr sheaths (p < 0.027). Bilateral percutaneous closure was successful in 63% (28/44) of patients. Conversion to open femoral arteriotomy due to bleeding occurred in 24 of 106 percutaneous attempts. There were no dissections, arterial thromboses, or pseudoaneurysms associated with percutaneous arterial closure. Wound complications were seen in 3.6% (3/84) of open arteriotomies and 0.9% (1/106) of all percutaneous attempts and arterial closures (p > 0.05). Gender, previous femoral access, obesity, and iliac occlusive disease were not predictive of percutaneous failure. Procedural success for percutaneous AAA repair is affected by sheath size. Devices delivered through 16 Fr or smaller sheaths will have successful femoral artery closure rates of at least 85%.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty/methods , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Femoral Artery/surgery , Postoperative Hemorrhage/etiology , Suture Techniques/instrumentation , Aged , Angioplasty/adverse effects , Catheters, Indwelling , Equipment and Supplies , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Suture Techniques/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
3.
J Vasc Surg ; 35(1): 120-4, 2002 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11802142

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To describe four patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm and bilateral common iliac artery aneurysms repaired by coil embolization of the ipsilateral internal iliac artery, aortouniiliac endograft extended to the ipsilateral external iliac artery, femorofemoral bypass grafting, and a contralateral external iliac to internal iliac stent graft to preserve pelvic perfusion. METHODS: Four patients with multiple risk factors, abdominal aortic aneurysm (mean diameter, 6.6 cm), and bilateral common iliac artery aneurysms were evaluated with contrast-enhanced computed tomography scanning, arteriography, and intravascular ultrasonography. Aortobiiliac endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair was not feasible because of extension of the common iliac artery aneurysms to the iliac bifurcation bilaterally. RESULTS: The abdominal aortic aneurysms were repaired with an aortouniiliac endograft. The ipsilateral common iliac artery aneurysms were treated by coil embolization of the internal iliac artery and extension of the endograft to the external iliac artery. The contralateral common iliac artery aneurysms were excluded by a custom-made stent graft (n = 2) or a commercial stent graft (n = 2) from the external iliac artery to the internal iliac artery, which preserved pelvic inflow via retrograde perfusion from the femorofemoral bypass. Mean length of stay was 3.5 days. One patient had hip claudication. Follow-up (mean 10 months, range 6 to 17) demonstrated exclusion of the abdominal aortic aneurysm and common iliac artery aneurysms with no endoleak and patent external iliac artery-to-internal iliac artery endografts in all patients. CONCLUSION: Patients with bilateral common iliac artery aneurysms that extend to the iliac bifurcation may be excluded from endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair because of concerns regarding pelvic ischemia after occlusion of both internal iliac arteries. External iliac artery-to-internal iliac artery endografting is a feasible alternative to maintain pelvic perfusion and still allow endograft repair of the abdominal aortic aneurysm in these patients.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Embolization, Therapeutic/methods , Endoscopy/methods , Iliac Aneurysm/surgery , Iliac Artery/surgery , Pelvis/blood supply , Stents , Aged , Angiography , Aorta, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Aorta, Abdominal/surgery , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Femoral Artery/diagnostic imaging , Femoral Artery/surgery , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Iliac Aneurysm/diagnostic imaging , Length of Stay , Male , Pelvis/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Ultrasonography, Interventional
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...