Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 28(8): 2262-2267, 2019 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31178359

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Uncertainty persists over the effects of blood pressure-lowering treatment in acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). We assessed the effects of treatment with candesartan in acute ICH and according to different types of hematoma. METHODS: Post-hoc analysis of the Scandinavian Candesartan Acute Stroke Trial, a randomized- and placebo-controlled, double-masked trial of candesartan in patients with any stroke within the acute phase (<30 hours) and high systolic blood pressure (≥140 mm Hg). We collected baseline computed tomography scans of participants with ICH, and characterized hematoma volume (planimetric approach), location (deep versus lobar or infratentorial), hemisphere side, and presence of intraventricular hemorrhage. The trial's 2 coprimary effect variables were the composite endpoint of vascular death, stroke or myocardial infarction, and functional outcome at 6 months according to the modified Rankin scale. We used Cox, ordinal, and binary logistic regression for analysis and adjusted for key, predefined prognostic variables. RESULTS: Of 274 participants with ICH, computed tomography scans were available in 205 patients (74.8%). There were no significant differences between the candesartan and placebo groups with respect to hematoma volume (median 15.6 mL versus 13.5 mL, P = .96), deep location (77% versus 72%, P = .64), right hemisphere (49% versus 51%, P = .46), and presence of intraventricular hemorrhage (18% versus 11%, P = .22). Candesartan was associated with a significant increase in poor functional outcome in patients with deep hematoma (adjusted common odds ratio 2.27, 95% confidence interval 1.23-4.18, P = .009, P for interaction .015), but there was no differential effect on functional outcome or vascular events in any of the other imaging subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Candesartan was not associated with any beneficial effect when initiated in the acute phase of ICH, a possible adverse effect on functional outcome in patients with deep hematomas cannot be ruled out by this study alone.


Subject(s)
Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/therapeutic use , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Benzimidazoles/therapeutic use , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Cerebral Hemorrhage/drug therapy , Hematoma/drug therapy , Tetrazoles/therapeutic use , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/adverse effects , Antihypertensive Agents/adverse effects , Benzimidazoles/adverse effects , Biphenyl Compounds , Cerebral Hemorrhage/diagnostic imaging , Cerebral Hemorrhage/physiopathology , Double-Blind Method , Female , Hematoma/diagnostic imaging , Hematoma/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Scandinavian and Nordic Countries , Tetrazoles/adverse effects , Time Factors , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...