Single-session, graded esophageal dilation without fluoroscopy in outpatients with lower esophageal (Schatzki's) rings: a prospective, long-term follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: Distal esophageal (Schatzki's) ring is a frequent cause of dysphagia. Bougienage is generally effective but relapses are common. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and long-term efficacy of single-session graded esophageal dilation with Savary dilators, without fluoroscopic guidance, in outpatients who presented with Schatzki's ring. METHODS: The study was performed on 44 consecutive patients with symptomatic Schatzki's ring, detected endoscopically and/or radiologically. Graded esophageal dilation was performed as an outpatient procedure in a single session with Savary dilators, without fluoroscopic guidance. After appropriate assessment with esophageal manometry and 24 h ambulatory pHmetry, patients with documented gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) were treated with omeprazole continuously. All results, including clinical follow up and technical aspects of bougienage, were recorded prospectively. The necessity for re-dilation after documentation of the ring with endoscopy and/or radiology was considered as a relapse of the ring. RESULTS: In four (9%) patients a second session was necessary to ensure complete symptom relief. Two (4.5%) patients developed post-dilation bacteremia and were managed with antibiotics as outpatients. Patients with (n = 14) or without (n = 30) GERD were comparable with respect to sex, age, body mass index, smoke and ethanol consumption, diameter of the esophageal lumen at the level of the ring, resting lower esophageal sphincter pressure, duration of dysphagia, need for taking antacids during the follow-up period, and duration of follow-up. There was no recurrence of the ring in patients with GERD during a mean follow-up period of 43.8 +/- 9.3 months (range 27-62 months); however, in patients without GERD, during a mean follow-up period of 40.6 +/- 12.2 months (range 10-58 months), 32% of patients relapsed after a mean 19.9 +/- 10.6 months (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Single-session graded esophageal dilation with large caliber Savary dilators without fluoroscopic guidance can be safely used for the symptomatic relief in patients with lower esophageal (Schatzki's) rings. GERD should be treated if present in order to prevent a symptomatic recurrence of the ring.

Endoscopic ultrasonography versus other diagnostic modalities in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis.

Until recently, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of and therapy in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis. However, the non-negligible complication rate of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP has led investigators to identify different noninvasive diagnostic modalities. Endoscopic ultrasonography has been proved to be of great sensitivity (up to 97%) in the diagnosis of even tiny stones that can be easily masked by contrast medium during ERCP, without any procedure-related complications and with a negative predictive value reaching 100%, meaning that it can accurately and safely identify patients with choledocholithiasis, thereby avoiding inappropriate instrumental exploration of the common bile duct.

Endoscopic therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review.

The high prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in Western societies has accelerated the need for new modalities of treatment. Currently, medical and surgical therapies are widely accepted among patients and physicians. The minimally invasive treatment revolution, however, has stimulated several new endoscopic techniques for GERD. Up to now, the data is limited and further studies are necessary to compare the advantages and disadvantages of the various endoscopic techniques to medical and laparoscopic management of GERD. This systematic review reports the efficacy and durability of various endoscopic therapies for GERD whilst the potential for widespread use of these techniques is also discussed. Despite the limited number of studies and remarkable differences between various trials, strict criteria were used for the pooled data presented and an effort was made to avoid bias by including only studies that used off-antisecretory medication scoring as baseline and intent to treat.

Eosinophilic esophagitis in adults: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) is an increasingly recognized condition both in children and adults. The aim of the present study was to review the available evidence regarding EE in adults. METHODS: PubMed, MEDLINE and medical textbooks were searched in May-June 2005 for English-language articles published between January 1978 and June 2005 containing relevant terms. The abstracts of two major conferences from 2000 to June 2005 were also reviewed. The presence of more than 15 eosinophils per high power field on esophageal biopsies was required to establish the diagnosis. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies with 325 patients (male/female ratio: 3/1) were found that met the review criteria. Presenting symptoms included dysphagia (93%), food impaction (62%) and heartburn (23.6%). An allergic history and peripheral eosinophilia was noted in 51.6 and 30.8% of patients, respectively. Esophageal manometry presented evidence of a motility disorder in 40% of cases. Endoscopic findings included mucosal fragility/oedema, rings, strictures, whitish pinpoint exudates and small-calibre esophagus in 59.3, 49.2, 39.7, 15.7 and 5.3% of cases, respectively, whereas 8.8% of patients had a normal endoscopy. Bougienage was performed in 64 patients, with limited efficacy and an increased complication rate. The administration of corticosteroids resulted in symptomatic improvement in more than 95% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: An allergic history and peripheral eosinophilia is less common in adults than among children with EE. An esophageal motility disorder should be a novel indication for biopsies in adults with long-lasting dysphagia. A trial with corticosteroids before bougienage may reduce active inflammation and the complication rate.

Somatostatin inhibits gastric acid secretion more effectively than pantoprazole in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Gastric acid inhibition is beneficial in the management of peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB). The aim of this double-blind study was to test whether somatostatin (SST) increases intragastric pH in PUB as compared with pantoprazole (PAN) and placebo (PLA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eligible patients were randomized to receive SST (500 microg/h+250 microg bolus), or PAN (8 mg/h+80 mg bolus) or PLA (normal saline) i.v., for 24 h. All patients underwent gastric pH monitoring during the infusion of the trial drugs. RESULTS: The three groups (SST, n=14; PAN, n=14; PLA, n=15) were comparable for age, gender, aetiology of PUB and laboratory data at admission. Mean (+/-SE) baseline pH levels in the fundus increased during the administration of the trial drugs (SST: 1.94+/-0.18 to 6.13+/-0.37, p<0.0001; PAN: 1.93+/-0.16 to 5.65+/-0.37, p<0.0001; PLA: 1.86+/-0.12 to 2.10+/-0.15, p=0.0917). During the first 12 h of infusion, the mean (+/-SE) percentage time spent above pH 4.0 and 5.4 was higher with SST versus PAN (84.4%+/-4.8 versus 55.1%+/-8.3, p=0.0049 and 74.2%+/-6.5 versus 47.1%+/-8.3, p=0.0163, respectively) and there was a trend favouring the SST group regarding the time spent above pH 6.0 and 6.8 (65.7%+/-6.4 versus 43.3%+/-8.2, p=0.0669 and 49.2%+/-7.7 versus 28.4+/-6.6, p=0.0738, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In PUB, both SST and PAN inhibit gastric acid secretion as compared with placebo. However, during the first 12 h of the infusion, SST was more effective than PAN in maintaining high intragastric pH. These results may provide a rationale for the administration of SST in PUB.

Bowel preparation increases the diagnostic yield of capsule endoscopy: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the value of small-bowel preparation for patients undergoing capsule endoscopy. METHODS: The study design was prospective, randomized, and controlled. Eighty patients referred for capsule endoscopy were randomized into two equal groups. Patients in Group A (mean age 54.40 [15.65] years) ingested 2 L of a polyethylene glycol/electrolyte solution 16 hours before the test, whereas patients in Group B (mean age 59.85 [14.58] years) prepared for the procedure by taking only clear liquids during the prior day. The primary outcome evaluated was the effect of bowel preparation on the quality of capsule images, as assessed with an objective scoring system in which cleansing was graded as "adequate" or "inadequate" by blinded examiners. A secondary outcome was the effect of bowel preparation on diagnostic yield. For this purpose, the results of capsule endoscopy were classified as positive findings, findings of uncertain significance, and no findings. RESULTS: Cleansing of the small intestine was considered "adequate" in 36 patients in Group A (90%) vs. 24 patients of Group B (60%) (p = 0.004). A diagnosis was established in 26 patients in Group A (65%) compared with 12 patients in Group B (30%) (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Bowel preparation before capsule endoscopy improves visualization of the small intestine, which may lead to an improvement in diagnostic yield.