ABSTRACT
Activity-Based Probes (ABPs) are small molecules that form stable covalent bonds with active enzymes thereby allowing detection and quantification of their activities in complex proteomes. A number of ABPs that target proteolytic enzymes have been designed based on well-characterized mechanism-based inhibitors. We describe here the evaluation of a novel series of ABPs based on the aza-aspartate inhibitory scaffold. Previous in vitro kinetic studies showed that this scaffold has a high degree of selectivity for the caspases, clan CD cysteine proteases activated during apoptotic cell death. Aza-aspartate ABPs containing either an epoxide or Michael acceptor reactive group were potent labels of executioner caspases in apoptotic cell extracts. However they were also effective labels of the clan CD protease legumain and showed unexpected crossreactivity with the clan CA protease cathepsin B. Interestingly, related aza peptides containing an acyloxymethyl ketone reactive group were relatively weak but highly selective labels of caspases. Thus azapeptide electrophiles are valuable new ABPs for both detection of a broad range of cysteine protease activities and for selective targeting of caspases. This study also highlights the importance of confirming the specificity of covalent protease inhibitors in crude proteomes using reagents such as the ABPs described here.
Subject(s)
Aza Compounds/chemistry , Aza Compounds/chemical synthesis , Caspases/chemistry , Cysteine Endopeptidases/chemistry , Molecular Probes/chemistry , Caspases/metabolism , Cells, Cultured , Cysteine Endopeptidases/metabolism , Electrochemistry , Enzyme Activation , Humans , Indicators and Reagents , Molecular Probe Techniques , Molecular Probes/chemical synthesis , Molecular Structure , Substrate SpecificityABSTRACT
A single-blind, parallel group, general practice study was carried out in 153 patients with mild to moderate depression to compare the efficacy and tolerability of flupenthixol dihydrochloride and dothiepin hydrochloride. Patients were allocated at random to receive single daily doses of either 1 mg flupenthixol in the morning or 75 mg dothiepin in the evening, and this dose could be doubled at the end of 2 weeks in the event of inadequate response. Assessments were made on entry and after 1, 2, 4 and 6 weeks of treatment using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, a 4-point severity scale and an unwanted symptoms checklist. The results showed that both treatments significantly improved the patients' condition over 6 weeks, and there was a significant difference in favour of flupenthixol at end-point. Both drugs were well tolerated, although persistence of anticholinergic side-effects in the dothiepin group resulted in a trend favouring flupenthixol. One patient in the flupenthixol group attempted suicide by overdose but made a complete recovery.
